Arterial Spin Labeling (ASL) MRI
Arterial Spin Labeling (ASL) MRI
Standard reconstruction benchmark — forward model perfectly known, no calibration needed. Score = 0.5 × clip((PSNR−15)/30, 0, 1) + 0.5 × SSIM
| # | Method | Score | PSNR (dB) | SSIM | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🥇 |
Score-MRI (ASL)
Score-MRI (ASL) Chung & Ye, Med. Image Anal. 93:102689, 2022
36.7 dB
SSIM 0.942
Checkpoint unavailable
|
0.833 | 36.7 | 0.942 | ✓ Certified | Chung & Ye, Med. Image Anal. 93:102689, 2022 |
| 🥈 |
PromptMR
PromptMR Xin et al., ECCV 2024
36.1 dB
SSIM 0.934
Checkpoint unavailable
|
0.819 | 36.1 | 0.934 | ✓ Certified | Xin et al., ECCV 2024 |
| 🥉 |
ReconFormer
ReconFormer Guo et al., IEEE TMI 41(5):1297, 2024
35.4 dB
SSIM 0.922
Checkpoint unavailable
|
0.801 | 35.4 | 0.922 | ✓ Certified | Guo et al., IEEE TMI 41(5):1297, 2024 |
| 4 |
E2E-VarNet
E2E-VarNet Sriram et al., MICCAI 2020
34.6 dB
SSIM 0.908
Checkpoint unavailable
|
0.781 | 34.6 | 0.908 | ✓ Certified | Sriram et al., MICCAI 2020 |
| 5 |
Kinetic-CS
Kinetic-CS Zhao et al., JMRI 60(4):1204, 2024
33.2 dB
SSIM 0.891
Checkpoint unavailable
|
0.749 | 33.2 | 0.891 | ✓ Certified | Zhao et al., JMRI 60(4):1204, 2024 |
| 6 |
U-Net (ASL)
U-Net (ASL) Tian et al., MRM 89(4):1616, 2023
32.1 dB
SSIM 0.876
Checkpoint unavailable
|
0.723 | 32.1 | 0.876 | ✓ Certified | Tian et al., MRM 89(4):1616, 2023 |
| 7 | PnP-DnCNN | 0.668 | 29.8 | 0.843 | ✓ Certified | Ahmad et al., IEEE SPM 2020 |
| 8 |
L1-Wavelet (ESPIRiT)
L1-Wavelet (ESPIRiT) Lustig et al., MRM 2007; Uecker et al., MRM 2014
28.3 dB
SSIM 0.820
Try in SpecLab →
|
0.632 | 28.3 | 0.820 | ✓ Certified | Lustig et al., MRM 2007; Uecker et al., MRM 2014 |
| 9 | Zero-Filled IFFT | 0.448 | 24.5 | 0.580 | ✓ Certified | Zbontar et al., fastMRI, arXiv 2018 |
Dataset: PWM Benchmark (9 algorithms)
Blind Reconstruction Challenge — forward model has unknown mismatch, must calibrate from data. Score = 0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖)
| # | Method | Overall Score | Public PSNR / SSIM |
Dev PSNR / SSIM |
Hidden PSNR / SSIM |
Trust | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🥇 |
Score-MRI (ASL) + gradient
Score-MRI (ASL) + gradient Chung & Ye, Med. Image Anal. 93:102689, 2022 Score 0.749
Correct & Reconstruct →
|
0.749 |
0.804
33.97 dB / 0.961
|
0.729
29.29 dB / 0.905
|
0.713
29.27 dB / 0.905
|
✓ Certified | Chung & Ye, Med. Image Anal. 93:102689, 2022 |
| 🥈 | PromptMR + gradient | 0.733 |
0.820
34.76 dB / 0.966
|
0.724
29.22 dB / 0.904
|
0.654
25.68 dB / 0.823
|
✓ Certified | Xin et al., ECCV 2024 |
| 🥉 | ReconFormer + gradient | 0.721 |
0.790
33.23 dB / 0.955
|
0.714
29.19 dB / 0.904
|
0.660
26.34 dB / 0.841
|
✓ Certified | Guo et al., IEEE TMI 41(5):1297, 2024 |
| 4 | E2E-VarNet + gradient | 0.708 |
0.800
33.24 dB / 0.955
|
0.703
28.01 dB / 0.881
|
0.621
24.3 dB / 0.779
|
✓ Certified | Sriram et al., MICCAI 2020 |
| 5 | U-Net (ASL) + gradient | 0.678 |
0.764
30.59 dB / 0.925
|
0.648
25.03 dB / 0.803
|
0.622
24.45 dB / 0.784
|
✓ Certified | Tian et al., MRM 89(4):1616, 2023 |
| 6 | PnP-DnCNN + gradient | 0.660 |
0.704
27.97 dB / 0.880
|
0.656
25.51 dB / 0.818
|
0.620
24.12 dB / 0.773
|
✓ Certified | Ahmad et al., IEEE SPM 2020 |
| 7 | Kinetic-CS + gradient | 0.627 |
0.755
30.67 dB / 0.926
|
0.600
23.88 dB / 0.764
|
0.526
20.72 dB / 0.633
|
✓ Certified | Zhao et al., JMRI 60(4):1204, 2024 |
| 8 | Zero-Filled IFFT + gradient | 0.534 |
0.567
21.6 dB / 0.673
|
0.551
21.09 dB / 0.650
|
0.485
19.84 dB / 0.591
|
✓ Certified | Zbontar et al., fastMRI, arXiv 2018 |
| 9 |
L1-Wavelet (ESPIRiT) + gradient
L1-Wavelet (ESPIRiT) + gradient Lustig et al., MRM 2007; Uecker et al., MRM 2014 Score 0.504
Correct & Reconstruct →
|
0.504 |
0.668
25.75 dB / 0.825
|
0.468
18.32 dB / 0.516
|
0.376
15.44 dB / 0.375
|
✓ Certified | Lustig et al., MRM 2007; Uecker et al., MRM 2014 |
Complete score requires all 3 tiers (Public + Dev + Hidden).
Join the competition →Full-access development tier with all data visible.
What you get & how to use
What you get: Measurements (y), ideal forward operator (H), spec ranges, ground truth (x_true), and true mismatch spec.
How to use: Load HDF5 → compare reconstruction vs x_true → check consistency → iterate.
What to submit: Reconstructed signals (x_hat) and corrected spec as HDF5.
Public Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PromptMR + gradient | 0.820 | 34.76 | 0.966 |
| 2 | Score-MRI (ASL) + gradient | 0.804 | 33.97 | 0.961 |
| 3 | E2E-VarNet + gradient | 0.800 | 33.24 | 0.955 |
| 4 | ReconFormer + gradient | 0.790 | 33.23 | 0.955 |
| 5 | U-Net (ASL) + gradient | 0.764 | 30.59 | 0.925 |
| 6 | Kinetic-CS + gradient | 0.755 | 30.67 | 0.926 |
| 7 | PnP-DnCNN + gradient | 0.704 | 27.97 | 0.88 |
| 8 | L1-Wavelet (ESPIRiT) + gradient | 0.668 | 25.75 | 0.825 |
| 9 | Zero-Filled IFFT + gradient | 0.567 | 21.6 | 0.673 |
Spec Ranges (3 parameters)
| Parameter | Min | Max | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| labeling_efficiency | 0.83 | 0.89 | - |
| transit_delay | 1.2 | 2.1 | s |
| t1_blood_error | -2.0 | 4.0 | - |
Blind evaluation tier — no ground truth available.
What you get & how to use
What you get: Measurements (y), ideal forward operator (H), and spec ranges only.
How to use: Apply your pipeline from the Public tier. Use consistency as self-check.
What to submit: Reconstructed signals and corrected spec. Scored server-side.
Dev Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Score-MRI (ASL) + gradient | 0.729 | 29.29 | 0.905 |
| 2 | PromptMR + gradient | 0.724 | 29.22 | 0.904 |
| 3 | ReconFormer + gradient | 0.714 | 29.19 | 0.904 |
| 4 | E2E-VarNet + gradient | 0.703 | 28.01 | 0.881 |
| 5 | PnP-DnCNN + gradient | 0.656 | 25.51 | 0.818 |
| 6 | U-Net (ASL) + gradient | 0.648 | 25.03 | 0.803 |
| 7 | Kinetic-CS + gradient | 0.600 | 23.88 | 0.764 |
| 8 | Zero-Filled IFFT + gradient | 0.551 | 21.09 | 0.65 |
| 9 | L1-Wavelet (ESPIRiT) + gradient | 0.468 | 18.32 | 0.516 |
Spec Ranges (3 parameters)
| Parameter | Min | Max | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| labeling_efficiency | 0.826 | 0.886 | - |
| transit_delay | 1.14 | 2.04 | s |
| t1_blood_error | -2.4 | 3.6 | - |
Fully blind server-side evaluation — no data download.
What you get & how to use
What you get: No data downloadable. Algorithm runs server-side on hidden measurements.
How to use: Package algorithm as Docker container / Python script. Submit via link.
What to submit: Containerized algorithm accepting y + H, outputting x_hat + corrected spec.
Hidden Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Score-MRI (ASL) + gradient | 0.713 | 29.27 | 0.905 |
| 2 | ReconFormer + gradient | 0.660 | 26.34 | 0.841 |
| 3 | PromptMR + gradient | 0.654 | 25.68 | 0.823 |
| 4 | U-Net (ASL) + gradient | 0.622 | 24.45 | 0.784 |
| 5 | E2E-VarNet + gradient | 0.621 | 24.3 | 0.779 |
| 6 | PnP-DnCNN + gradient | 0.620 | 24.12 | 0.773 |
| 7 | Kinetic-CS + gradient | 0.526 | 20.72 | 0.633 |
| 8 | Zero-Filled IFFT + gradient | 0.485 | 19.84 | 0.591 |
| 9 | L1-Wavelet (ESPIRiT) + gradient | 0.376 | 15.44 | 0.375 |
Spec Ranges (3 parameters)
| Parameter | Min | Max | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| labeling_efficiency | 0.836 | 0.896 | - |
| transit_delay | 1.29 | 2.19 | s |
| t1_blood_error | -1.4 | 4.6 | - |
Blind Reconstruction Challenge
ChallengeGiven measurements with unknown mismatch and spec ranges (not exact params), reconstruct the original signal. A method must be evaluated on all three tiers for a complete score. Scored on a composite metric: 0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖).
Measurements y, ideal forward model H, spec ranges
Reconstructed signal x̂
Spec DAG — Forward Model Pipeline
M → F → S → D
Mismatch Parameters
| Symbol | Parameter | Description | Nominal | Perturbed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| l_e | labeling_efficiency | Labeling efficiency (-) | 0.85 | 0.87 |
| t_d | transit_delay | Transit delay (s) | 1.5 | 1.8 |
| t_b | t1_blood_error | T1 blood error (-) | 0.0 | 2.0 |
Credits System
Spec Primitives Reference (11 primitives)
Free-space or medium propagation kernel (Fresnel, Rayleigh-Sommerfeld).
Spatial or spatio-temporal amplitude modulation (coded aperture, SLM pattern).
Geometric projection operator (Radon transform, fan-beam, cone-beam).
Sampling in the Fourier / k-space domain (MRI, ptychography).
Shift-invariant convolution with a point-spread function (PSF).
Summation along a physical dimension (spectral, temporal, angular).
Sensor readout with gain g and noise model η (Gaussian, Poisson, mixed).
Patterned illumination (block, Hadamard, random) applied to the scene.
Spectral dispersion element (prism, grating) with shift α and aperture a.
Sample or gantry rotation (CT, electron tomography).
Spectral filter or monochromator selecting a wavelength band.