Public
Arterial Spin Labeling (ASL) MRI — Public Tier
(3 scenes)Full-access development tier with all data visible.
What you get
Measurements (y), ideal forward operator (H), spec ranges, ground truth (x_true), and true mismatch spec.
How to use
Load HDF5 → compare reconstruction vs x_true → check consistency → iterate.
What to submit
Reconstructed signals (x_hat) and corrected spec as HDF5.
Parameter Specifications
✓
True spec visible — use these exact values for Scenario III oracle reconstruction.
| Parameter | Spec Range | True Value | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| labeling_efficiency | 0.83 – 0.89 | 0.86 | - |
| transit_delay | 1.2 – 2.1 | 1.65 | s |
| t1_blood_error | -2.0 – 4.0 | 1.0 | - |
InverseNet Baseline Scores
Method: CPU_baseline — Mismatch parameter: nominal
Scenario I (Ideal)
17.61 dB
SSIM 0.3262
Scenario II (Mismatch)
13.39 dB
SSIM 0.0553
Scenario III (Oracle)
16.66 dB
SSIM 0.1359
Per-scene breakdown (4 scenes)
| Scene | PSNR I | SSIM I | PSNR II | SSIM II | PSNR III | SSIM III |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| scene_00 | 16.58 | 0.3251 | 12.85 | 0.0515 | 16.16 | 0.1317 |
| scene_01 | 18.88 | 0.3252 | 14.12 | 0.0562 | 17.37 | 0.1299 |
| scene_02 | 18.30 | 0.3298 | 13.74 | 0.0603 | 16.95 | 0.1425 |
| scene_03 | 16.68 | 0.3248 | 12.85 | 0.0534 | 16.15 | 0.1394 |
Public Tier Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM | Consistency | Trust | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PromptMR + gradient | 0.820 | 34.76 | 0.966 | 0.93 | ✓ Certified | Xin et al., ECCV 2024 |
| 2 | Score-MRI (ASL) + gradient | 0.804 | 33.97 | 0.961 | 0.9 | ✓ Certified | Chung & Ye, Med. Image Anal. 93:102689, 2022 |
| 3 | E2E-VarNet + gradient | 0.800 | 33.24 | 0.955 | 0.93 | ✓ Certified | Sriram et al., MICCAI 2020 |
| 4 | ReconFormer + gradient | 0.790 | 33.23 | 0.955 | 0.88 | ✓ Certified | Guo et al., IEEE TMI 41(5):1297, 2024 |
| 5 | U-Net (ASL) + gradient | 0.764 | 30.59 | 0.925 | 0.94 | ✓ Certified | Tian et al., MRM 89(4):1616, 2023 |
| 6 | Kinetic-CS + gradient | 0.755 | 30.67 | 0.926 | 0.89 | ✓ Certified | Zhao et al., JMRI 60(4):1204, 2024 |
| 7 | PnP-DnCNN + gradient | 0.704 | 27.97 | 0.88 | 0.86 | ✓ Certified | Ahmad et al., IEEE SPM 2020 |
| 8 | L1-Wavelet (ESPIRiT) + gradient | 0.668 | 25.75 | 0.825 | 0.9 | ✓ Certified | Lustig et al., MRM 2007; Uecker et al., MRM 2014 |
| 9 | Zero-Filled IFFT + gradient | 0.567 | 21.6 | 0.673 | 0.91 | ✓ Certified | Zbontar et al., fastMRI, arXiv 2018 |
Visible Data Fields
y
H_ideal
spec_ranges
x_true
true_spec
Dataset
Format: HDF5
Scenes: 3
Scoring Formula
0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖)
PSNR: 40%
SSIM: 40%
Consistency: 20%