Dev
Arterial Spin Labeling (ASL) MRI — Dev Tier
(3 scenes)Blind evaluation tier — no ground truth available.
What you get
Measurements (y), ideal forward operator (H), and spec ranges only.
How to use
Apply your pipeline from the Public tier. Use consistency as self-check.
What to submit
Reconstructed signals and corrected spec. Scored server-side.
Parameter Specifications
🔒
True spec hidden — estimate parameters from spec ranges below.
| Parameter | Spec Range | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| labeling_efficiency | 0.826 – 0.886 | - |
| transit_delay | 1.14 – 2.04 | s |
| t1_blood_error | -2.4 – 3.6 | - |
Dev Tier Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM | Consistency | Trust | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Score-MRI (ASL) + gradient | 0.729 | 29.29 | 0.905 | 0.87 | ✓ Certified | Chung & Ye, Med. Image Anal. 93:102689, 2022 |
| 2 | PromptMR + gradient | 0.724 | 29.22 | 0.904 | 0.85 | ✓ Certified | Xin et al., ECCV 2024 |
| 3 | ReconFormer + gradient | 0.714 | 29.19 | 0.904 | 0.8 | ✓ Certified | Guo et al., IEEE TMI 41(5):1297, 2024 |
| 4 | E2E-VarNet + gradient | 0.703 | 28.01 | 0.881 | 0.85 | ✓ Certified | Sriram et al., MICCAI 2020 |
| 5 | PnP-DnCNN + gradient | 0.656 | 25.51 | 0.818 | 0.87 | ✓ Certified | Ahmad et al., IEEE SPM 2020 |
| 6 | U-Net (ASL) + gradient | 0.648 | 25.03 | 0.803 | 0.88 | ✓ Certified | Tian et al., MRM 89(4):1616, 2023 |
| 7 | Kinetic-CS + gradient | 0.600 | 23.88 | 0.764 | 0.78 | ✓ Certified | Zhao et al., JMRI 60(4):1204, 2024 |
| 8 | Zero-Filled IFFT + gradient | 0.551 | 21.09 | 0.65 | 0.9 | ✓ Certified | Zbontar et al., fastMRI, arXiv 2018 |
| 9 | L1-Wavelet (ESPIRiT) + gradient | 0.468 | 18.32 | 0.516 | 0.89 | ✓ Certified | Lustig et al., MRM 2007; Uecker et al., MRM 2014 |
Visible Data Fields
y
H_ideal
spec_ranges
Dataset
Format: HDF5
Scenes: 3
Scoring Formula
0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖)
PSNR: 40%
SSIM: 40%
Consistency: 20%