X-ray Fluorescence Tomography
X-ray Fluorescence Tomography
Standard reconstruction benchmark — forward model perfectly known, no calibration needed. Score = 0.5 × clip((PSNR−15)/30, 0, 1) + 0.5 × SSIM
| # | Method | Score | PSNR (dB) | SSIM | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🥇 |
DiffusionInstrumentation
DiffusionInstrumentation Zhang et al., 2024
33.26 dB
SSIM 0.955
Checkpoint unavailable
|
0.782 | 33.26 | 0.955 | ✓ Certified | Zhang et al., 2024 |
| 🥈 |
Instrument-CNN
Instrument-CNN Instrument-specific CNN
32.31 dB
SSIM 0.946
Checkpoint unavailable
|
0.762 | 32.31 | 0.946 | ✓ Certified | Instrument-specific CNN |
| 🥉 |
CalibFormer
CalibFormer Transformer calibration, 2024
32.8 dB
SSIM 0.920
Checkpoint unavailable
|
0.757 | 32.8 | 0.920 | ✓ Certified | Transformer calibration, 2024 |
| 4 |
MassSpecFormer
MassSpecFormer Mass spectrometry transformer, 2024
30.98 dB
SSIM 0.931
Checkpoint unavailable
|
0.732 | 30.98 | 0.931 | ✓ Certified | Mass spectrometry transformer, 2024 |
| 5 |
ResNet-Calib
ResNet-Calib ResNet for calibration, 2022
31.3 dB
SSIM 0.892
Checkpoint unavailable
|
0.718 | 31.3 | 0.892 | ✓ Certified | ResNet for calibration, 2022 |
| 6 |
ScoreInstrumentation
ScoreInstrumentation Wei et al., 2025
29.05 dB
SSIM 0.901
Checkpoint unavailable
|
0.685 | 29.05 | 0.901 | ✓ Certified | Wei et al., 2025 |
| 7 | PnP-NLM | 0.627 | 26.92 | 0.856 | ✓ Certified | Non-local means filter |
| 8 | Calibration-Lookup | 0.621 | 26.73 | 0.851 | ✓ Certified | Look-up table calibration |
| 9 | PnP-BM3D | 0.605 | 27.6 | 0.790 | ✓ Certified | Danielyan et al., 2012 |
| 10 | Peak Fitting | 0.594 | 25.81 | 0.827 | ✓ Certified | Gaussian peak fitting |
| 11 | Deconv | 0.482 | 24.1 | 0.660 | ✓ Certified | Analytical baseline |
Dataset: PWM Benchmark (11 algorithms)
Blind Reconstruction Challenge — forward model has unknown mismatch, must calibrate from data. Score = 0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖)
| # | Method | Overall Score | Public PSNR / SSIM |
Dev PSNR / SSIM |
Hidden PSNR / SSIM |
Trust | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🥇 | CalibFormer + gradient | 0.708 |
0.775
31.34 dB / 0.935
|
0.707
27.74 dB / 0.875
|
0.643
25.81 dB / 0.827
|
✓ Certified | Transformer calibration, 2024 |
| 🥈 | Instrument-CNN + gradient | 0.663 |
0.741
29.54 dB / 0.910
|
0.639
25.28 dB / 0.811
|
0.608
23.84 dB / 0.763
|
✓ Certified | Instrument-specific CNN |
| 🥉 | ResNet-Calib + gradient | 0.656 |
0.728
29.08 dB / 0.902
|
0.629
24.42 dB / 0.783
|
0.612
24.27 dB / 0.778
|
✓ Certified | ResNet for calibration, 2022 |
| 4 | MassSpecFormer + gradient | 0.656 |
0.722
28.75 dB / 0.896
|
0.657
25.65 dB / 0.822
|
0.588
23.62 dB / 0.755
|
✓ Certified | Mass spectrometry transformer, 2024 |
| 5 | DiffusionInstrumentation + gradient | 0.656 |
0.781
31.57 dB / 0.938
|
0.622
24.11 dB / 0.772
|
0.564
21.83 dB / 0.683
|
✓ Certified | Zhang et al., 2024 |
| 6 | Calibration-Lookup + gradient | 0.624 |
0.625
23.83 dB / 0.762
|
0.620
23.92 dB / 0.766
|
0.628
24.78 dB / 0.795
|
✓ Certified | Look-up table calibration |
| 7 | Peak Fitting + gradient | 0.606 |
0.619
23.91 dB / 0.765
|
0.620
24.17 dB / 0.775
|
0.578
22.98 dB / 0.730
|
✓ Certified | Gaussian peak fitting |
| 8 | PnP-BM3D + gradient | 0.599 |
0.653
25.17 dB / 0.808
|
0.594
23.46 dB / 0.749
|
0.549
21.32 dB / 0.660
|
✓ Certified | Danielyan et al., 2012 |
| 9 | Deconv + gradient | 0.555 |
0.599
22.57 dB / 0.714
|
0.549
21.73 dB / 0.678
|
0.517
20.9 dB / 0.641
|
✓ Certified | Analytical baseline |
| 10 | ScoreInstrumentation + gradient | 0.521 |
0.688
27.02 dB / 0.859
|
0.461
18.29 dB / 0.514
|
0.415
16.7 dB / 0.435
|
✓ Certified | Wei et al., 2025 |
| 11 | PnP-NLM + gradient | 0.520 |
0.638
24.53 dB / 0.787
|
0.508
19.87 dB / 0.592
|
0.415
16.96 dB / 0.448
|
✓ Certified | Non-local means filter |
Complete score requires all 3 tiers (Public + Dev + Hidden).
Join the competition →Full-access development tier with all data visible.
What you get & how to use
What you get: Measurements (y), ideal forward operator (H), spec ranges, ground truth (x_true), and true mismatch spec.
How to use: Load HDF5 → compare reconstruction vs x_true → check consistency → iterate.
What to submit: Reconstructed signals (x_hat) and corrected spec as HDF5.
Public Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DiffusionInstrumentation + gradient | 0.781 | 31.57 | 0.938 |
| 2 | CalibFormer + gradient | 0.775 | 31.34 | 0.935 |
| 3 | Instrument-CNN + gradient | 0.741 | 29.54 | 0.91 |
| 4 | ResNet-Calib + gradient | 0.728 | 29.08 | 0.902 |
| 5 | MassSpecFormer + gradient | 0.722 | 28.75 | 0.896 |
| 6 | ScoreInstrumentation + gradient | 0.688 | 27.02 | 0.859 |
| 7 | PnP-BM3D + gradient | 0.653 | 25.17 | 0.808 |
| 8 | PnP-NLM + gradient | 0.638 | 24.53 | 0.787 |
| 9 | Calibration-Lookup + gradient | 0.625 | 23.83 | 0.762 |
| 10 | Peak Fitting + gradient | 0.619 | 23.91 | 0.765 |
| 11 | Deconv + gradient | 0.599 | 22.57 | 0.714 |
Spec Ranges (4 parameters)
| Parameter | Min | Max | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| self_absorption_correction | -6.0 | 12.0 | - |
| rotation_axis_offset | -0.6 | 1.2 | px |
| fluorescence_yield_error | -2.0 | 4.0 | - |
| dead_time_at_high_count_rate | -2.0 | 4.0 | - |
Blind evaluation tier — no ground truth available.
What you get & how to use
What you get: Measurements (y), ideal forward operator (H), and spec ranges only.
How to use: Apply your pipeline from the Public tier. Use consistency as self-check.
What to submit: Reconstructed signals and corrected spec. Scored server-side.
Dev Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CalibFormer + gradient | 0.707 | 27.74 | 0.875 |
| 2 | MassSpecFormer + gradient | 0.657 | 25.65 | 0.822 |
| 3 | Instrument-CNN + gradient | 0.639 | 25.28 | 0.811 |
| 4 | ResNet-Calib + gradient | 0.629 | 24.42 | 0.783 |
| 5 | DiffusionInstrumentation + gradient | 0.622 | 24.11 | 0.772 |
| 6 | Calibration-Lookup + gradient | 0.620 | 23.92 | 0.766 |
| 7 | Peak Fitting + gradient | 0.620 | 24.17 | 0.775 |
| 8 | PnP-BM3D + gradient | 0.594 | 23.46 | 0.749 |
| 9 | Deconv + gradient | 0.549 | 21.73 | 0.678 |
| 10 | PnP-NLM + gradient | 0.508 | 19.87 | 0.592 |
| 11 | ScoreInstrumentation + gradient | 0.461 | 18.29 | 0.514 |
Spec Ranges (4 parameters)
| Parameter | Min | Max | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| self_absorption_correction | -7.2 | 10.8 | - |
| rotation_axis_offset | -0.72 | 1.08 | px |
| fluorescence_yield_error | -2.4 | 3.6 | - |
| dead_time_at_high_count_rate | -2.4 | 3.6 | - |
Fully blind server-side evaluation — no data download.
What you get & how to use
What you get: No data downloadable. Algorithm runs server-side on hidden measurements.
How to use: Package algorithm as Docker container / Python script. Submit via link.
What to submit: Containerized algorithm accepting y + H, outputting x_hat + corrected spec.
Hidden Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CalibFormer + gradient | 0.643 | 25.81 | 0.827 |
| 2 | Calibration-Lookup + gradient | 0.628 | 24.78 | 0.795 |
| 3 | ResNet-Calib + gradient | 0.612 | 24.27 | 0.778 |
| 4 | Instrument-CNN + gradient | 0.608 | 23.84 | 0.763 |
| 5 | MassSpecFormer + gradient | 0.588 | 23.62 | 0.755 |
| 6 | Peak Fitting + gradient | 0.578 | 22.98 | 0.73 |
| 7 | DiffusionInstrumentation + gradient | 0.564 | 21.83 | 0.683 |
| 8 | PnP-BM3D + gradient | 0.549 | 21.32 | 0.66 |
| 9 | Deconv + gradient | 0.517 | 20.9 | 0.641 |
| 10 | ScoreInstrumentation + gradient | 0.415 | 16.7 | 0.435 |
| 11 | PnP-NLM + gradient | 0.415 | 16.96 | 0.448 |
Spec Ranges (4 parameters)
| Parameter | Min | Max | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| self_absorption_correction | -4.2 | 13.8 | - |
| rotation_axis_offset | -0.42 | 1.38 | px |
| fluorescence_yield_error | -1.4 | 4.6 | - |
| dead_time_at_high_count_rate | -1.4 | 4.6 | - |
Blind Reconstruction Challenge
ChallengeGiven measurements with unknown mismatch and spec ranges (not exact params), reconstruct the original signal. A method must be evaluated on all three tiers for a complete score. Scored on a composite metric: 0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖).
Measurements y, ideal forward model H, spec ranges
Reconstructed signal x̂
Spec DAG — Forward Model Pipeline
Π → R → D
Mismatch Parameters
| Symbol | Parameter | Description | Nominal | Perturbed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| s_c | self_absorption_correction | Self-absorption correction (-) | 0.0 | 6.0 |
| r_a | rotation_axis_offset | Rotation axis offset (px) | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| f_y | fluorescence_yield_error | Fluorescence yield error (-) | 0.0 | 2.0 |
| d_t | dead_time_at_high_count_rate | Dead time at high count rate (-) | 0.0 | 2.0 |
Credits System
Spec Primitives Reference (11 primitives)
Free-space or medium propagation kernel (Fresnel, Rayleigh-Sommerfeld).
Spatial or spatio-temporal amplitude modulation (coded aperture, SLM pattern).
Geometric projection operator (Radon transform, fan-beam, cone-beam).
Sampling in the Fourier / k-space domain (MRI, ptychography).
Shift-invariant convolution with a point-spread function (PSF).
Summation along a physical dimension (spectral, temporal, angular).
Sensor readout with gain g and noise model η (Gaussian, Poisson, mixed).
Patterned illumination (block, Hadamard, random) applied to the scene.
Spectral dispersion element (prism, grating) with shift α and aperture a.
Sample or gantry rotation (CT, electron tomography).
Spectral filter or monochromator selecting a wavelength band.