Dev

Widefield — Dev Tier

(5 scenes)

Blind evaluation tier — no ground truth available.

What you get

Measurements (y), ideal forward operator (H), and spec ranges only.

How to use

Apply your pipeline from the Public tier. Use consistency as self-check.

What to submit

Reconstructed signals and corrected spec. Scored server-side.

Parameter Specifications

🔒

True spec hidden — estimate parameters from spec ranges below.

Parameter Spec Range Unit
psf_sigma -12.0 – 18.0 %
defocus -0.6 – 0.9 μm
background -60.0 – 90.0

Dev Tier Leaderboard

# Method Score PSNR SSIM Consistency Trust Source
1 Restormer + gradient 0.762 31.22 0.934 0.88 ✓ Certified Zamir et al., CVPR 2022
2 Restormer+ + gradient 0.762 31.9 0.942 0.83 ✓ Certified Zamir et al., ICCV 2024
3 DiffDeconv + gradient 0.757 31.85 0.941 0.81 ✓ Certified Huang et al., NeurIPS 2024
4 DeconvFormer + gradient 0.732 30.6 0.926 0.78 ✓ Certified Chen et al., CVPR 2024
5 ScoreMicro + gradient 0.726 29.8 0.914 0.81 ✓ Certified Wei et al., ECCV 2025
6 ResUNet + gradient 0.710 28.09 0.883 0.88 ✓ Certified DeCelle et al., Nat. Methods 2021
7 Wiener Filter + gradient 0.676 26.65 0.849 0.85 ✓ Certified Analytical baseline
8 U-Net + gradient 0.666 26.75 0.852 0.79 ✓ Certified Ronneberger et al., MICCAI 2015
9 TV-Deconvolution + gradient 0.649 25.27 0.811 0.86 ✓ Certified Rudin et al., Phys. A 1992
10 PnP-DnCNN + gradient 0.639 25.25 0.81 0.81 ✓ Certified Zhang et al., IEEE TIP 2017
11 PnP-FISTA + gradient 0.630 24.35 0.781 0.87 ✓ Certified Bai et al., 2020
12 Richardson-Lucy + gradient 0.608 23.94 0.766 0.81 ✓ Certified Richardson, JOSA 1972 / Lucy, AJ 1974
13 CARE + gradient 0.591 23.5 0.75 0.78 ✓ Certified Weigert et al., Nat. Methods 2018

Visible Data Fields

y H_ideal spec_ranges

Dataset

Format: HDF5
Scenes: 5

Scoring Formula

0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖)

PSNR: 40% SSIM: 40% Consistency: 20%
Back to Widefield