Public

Ultrasound — Public Tier

(3 scenes)

Full-access development tier with all data visible.

What you get

Measurements (y), ideal forward operator (H), spec ranges, ground truth (x_true), and true mismatch spec.

How to use

Load HDF5 → compare reconstruction vs x_true → check consistency → iterate.

What to submit

Reconstructed signals (x_hat) and corrected spec as HDF5.

Parameter Specifications

True spec visible — use these exact values for Scenario III oracle reconstruction.

Parameter Spec Range True Value Unit
sos 1520.0 – 1580.0 1550.0 m/s
attenuation 0.4 – 0.7 0.55 dB/cm/MHz
element_sensitivity -5.0 – 10.0 2.5 %
phase_aberration -0.3 – 0.6 0.15 rad

InverseNet Baseline Scores

Method: CPU_baseline — Mismatch parameter: nominal

Scenario I (Ideal)

11.50 dB

SSIM 0.0990

Scenario II (Mismatch)

11.07 dB

SSIM 0.1317

Scenario III (Oracle)

11.54 dB

SSIM 0.1014

Per-scene breakdown (4 scenes)
Scene PSNR I SSIM I PSNR II SSIM II PSNR III SSIM III
scene_00 10.19 0.0676 9.89 0.0865 10.23 0.0692
scene_01 8.62 0.0544 8.54 0.0772 8.66 0.0576
scene_02 9.07 0.0584 9.61 0.0783 9.13 0.0593
scene_03 18.12 0.2158 16.23 0.2851 18.13 0.2197

Public Tier Leaderboard

# Method Score PSNR SSIM Consistency Trust Source
1 DiffUS + gradient 0.817 34.33 0.963 0.94 ✓ Certified Chen et al., NeurIPS 2024
2 ScoreUS + gradient 0.798 33.56 0.957 0.9 ✓ Certified Johnson et al., ECCV 2025
3 Phase-ADMM-Net + gradient 0.794 32.94 0.952 0.92 ✓ Certified Hou et al., IEEE TMI 2022
4 AttentionBeam + gradient 0.787 32.58 0.949 0.91 ✓ Certified Xu et al., ECCV 2024
5 BeamDATA + gradient 0.786 32.32 0.946 0.92 ✓ Certified Smith et al., ICCV 2024
6 BeamFormer + gradient 0.785 32.88 0.951 0.88 ✓ Certified Li et al., ICCV 2024
7 UltrasoundFormer + gradient 0.780 32.05 0.943 0.91 ✓ Certified Park et al., CVPR 2024
8 MU-Net + gradient 0.780 31.77 0.94 0.93 ✓ Certified Hyun et al., IEEE TUFFC 2022
9 ABLE + gradient 0.732 28.97 0.9 0.91 ✓ Certified Luijten et al., IEEE TMI 2020
10 PnP-ADMM + gradient 0.662 25.52 0.818 0.9 ✓ Certified Goudarzi et al., 2020
11 PW-DAS + gradient 0.658 25.11 0.806 0.92 ✓ Certified Plane wave synthesis baseline
12 PnP-TV + gradient 0.630 24.36 0.781 0.87 ✓ Certified TV regularization for ultrasound
13 DAS-CF + gradient 0.620 24.02 0.769 0.86 ✓ Certified Capon filter, IEEE 1969
14 DAS + gradient 0.574 22.0 0.69 0.89 ✓ Certified Analytical baseline

Visible Data Fields

y H_ideal spec_ranges x_true true_spec

Dataset

Format: HDF5
Scenes: 3

Scoring Formula

0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖)

PSNR: 40% SSIM: 40% Consistency: 20%
Back to Ultrasound