Dev

Two-Photon — Dev Tier

(5 scenes)

Blind evaluation tier — no ground truth available.

What you get

Measurements (y), ideal forward operator (H), and spec ranges only.

How to use

Apply your pipeline from the Public tier. Use consistency as self-check.

What to submit

Reconstructed signals and corrected spec. Scored server-side.

Parameter Specifications

🔒

True spec hidden — estimate parameters from spec ranges below.

Parameter Spec Range Unit
pulse_width 52.0 – 172.0 fs
gdd -600.0 – 900.0 fs²
scattering -12.0 – 18.0 %

Dev Tier Leaderboard

# Method Score PSNR SSIM Consistency Trust Source
1 DeconvFormer + gradient 0.794 33.38 0.956 0.89 ✓ Certified Chen et al., CVPR 2024
2 Restormer+ + gradient 0.762 31.26 0.934 0.88 ✓ Certified Zamir et al., ICCV 2024
3 Restormer + gradient 0.753 31.46 0.937 0.82 ✓ Certified Zamir et al., CVPR 2022
4 DiffDeconv + gradient 0.726 29.97 0.916 0.8 ✓ Certified Huang et al., NeurIPS 2024
5 U-Net + gradient 0.722 28.54 0.892 0.9 ✓ Certified Ronneberger et al., MICCAI 2015
6 ScoreMicro + gradient 0.719 28.5 0.891 0.89 ✓ Certified Wei et al., ECCV 2025
7 TV-Deconvolution + gradient 0.680 27.02 0.859 0.83 ✓ Certified Rudin et al., Phys. A 1992
8 ResUNet + gradient 0.662 25.79 0.826 0.87 ✓ Certified DeCelle et al., Nat. Methods 2021
9 CARE + gradient 0.660 26.45 0.844 0.79 ✓ Certified Weigert et al., Nat. Methods 2018
10 Wiener Filter + gradient 0.656 25.95 0.831 0.82 ✓ Certified Analytical baseline
11 Richardson-Lucy + gradient 0.631 24.31 0.779 0.88 ✓ Certified Richardson, JOSA 1972 / Lucy, AJ 1974
12 PnP-DnCNN + gradient 0.630 24.77 0.795 0.82 ✓ Certified Zhang et al., IEEE TIP 2017
13 PnP-FISTA + gradient 0.599 23.18 0.738 0.86 ✓ Certified Bai et al., 2020

Visible Data Fields

y H_ideal spec_ranges

Dataset

Format: HDF5
Scenes: 5

Scoring Formula

0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖)

PSNR: 40% SSIM: 40% Consistency: 20%
Back to Two-Photon