Public
SAR — Public Tier
(3 scenes)Full-access development tier with all data visible.
What you get
Measurements (y), ideal forward operator (H), spec ranges, ground truth (x_true), and true mismatch spec.
How to use
Load HDF5 → compare reconstruction vs x_true → check consistency → iterate.
What to submit
Reconstructed signals (x_hat) and corrected spec as HDF5.
Parameter Specifications
✓
True spec visible — use these exact values for Scenario III oracle reconstruction.
| Parameter | Spec Range | True Value | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| motion_error | -2.0 – 4.0 | 1.0 | cm |
| phase_error | -0.3 – 0.6 | 0.15 | rad |
| range_cell_migration | -0.5 – 1.0 | 0.25 | cells |
InverseNet Baseline Scores
Method: CPU_baseline — Mismatch parameter: nominal
Scenario I (Ideal)
25.50 dB
SSIM 0.7080
Scenario II (Mismatch)
25.49 dB
SSIM 0.7034
Scenario III (Oracle)
27.77 dB
SSIM 0.7333
Per-scene breakdown (4 scenes)
| Scene | PSNR I | SSIM I | PSNR II | SSIM II | PSNR III | SSIM III |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| scene_00 | 15.50 | 0.2342 | 15.45 | 0.2374 | 15.55 | 0.2305 |
| scene_01 | 29.03 | 0.8684 | 28.59 | 0.8712 | 31.59 | 0.9076 |
| scene_02 | 29.23 | 0.8516 | 28.33 | 0.8571 | 31.37 | 0.8998 |
| scene_03 | 28.23 | 0.8777 | 29.58 | 0.8479 | 32.56 | 0.8955 |
Public Tier Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM | Consistency | Trust | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PanSharpener++ + gradient | 0.803 | 33.58 | 0.958 | 0.92 | ✓ Certified | Zhang et al., ICCV 2024 |
| 2 | DiffusionSAR + gradient | 0.789 | 33.01 | 0.953 | 0.89 | ✓ Certified | Wei et al., NeurIPS 2024 |
| 3 | SARFormer + gradient | 0.762 | 30.88 | 0.929 | 0.91 | ✓ Certified | Li et al., CVPR 2024 |
| 4 | SAR-CAM + gradient | 0.738 | 29.47 | 0.908 | 0.9 | ✓ Certified | Cross-attention SAR, 2024 |
| 5 | ScoreSAR + gradient | 0.732 | 28.9 | 0.898 | 0.92 | ✓ Certified | Johnson et al., ECCV 2025 |
| 6 | SARDenoiserViT + gradient | 0.732 | 28.51 | 0.891 | 0.95 | ✓ Certified | Wang et al., ICCV 2024 |
| 7 | SAR-DRN + gradient | 0.717 | 28.46 | 0.89 | 0.88 | ✓ Certified | Zhang et al., RS 2018 |
| 8 | SAR-ResNet + gradient | 0.708 | 27.36 | 0.867 | 0.94 | ✓ Certified | Chen et al., IEEE TGRS 2022 |
| 9 | Lee Filter + gradient | 0.705 | 27.18 | 0.862 | 0.94 | ✓ Certified | Lee, IEEE TGRS 1980 |
| 10 | SAR-BM3D + gradient | 0.645 | 24.9 | 0.799 | 0.88 | ✓ Certified | Parrilli et al., IEEE TGRS 2012 |
| 11 | Range-Doppler + gradient | 0.617 | 23.74 | 0.759 | 0.88 | ✓ Certified | SAR signal processing baseline |
| 12 | Chirp Scaling + gradient | 0.558 | 21.01 | 0.646 | 0.95 | ✓ Certified | Raney et al., IEEE TGRS 1994 |
| 13 | Matched Filter + gradient | 0.542 | 20.79 | 0.636 | 0.9 | ✓ Certified | Standard SAR focusing |
Visible Data Fields
y
H_ideal
spec_ranges
x_true
true_spec
Dataset
Format: HDF5
Scenes: 3
Scoring Formula
0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖)
PSNR: 40%
SSIM: 40%
Consistency: 20%