Public

Proton Radiography — Public Tier

(3 scenes)

Full-access development tier with all data visible.

What you get

Measurements (y), ideal forward operator (H), spec ranges, ground truth (x_true), and true mismatch spec.

How to use

Load HDF5 → compare reconstruction vs x_true → check consistency → iterate.

What to submit

Reconstructed signals (x_hat) and corrected spec as HDF5.

Parameter Specifications

True spec visible — use these exact values for Scenario III oracle reconstruction.

Parameter Spec Range True Value Unit
energy_loss -2.0 – 4.0 1.0 %
scattering -5.0 – 10.0 2.5 %
range_straggling -3.0 – 6.0 1.5 %

InverseNet Baseline Scores

Method: CPU_baseline — Mismatch parameter: nominal

Scenario I (Ideal)

17.61 dB

SSIM 0.3262

Scenario II (Mismatch)

13.04 dB

SSIM 0.0468

Scenario III (Oracle)

16.34 dB

SSIM 0.1224

Per-scene breakdown (4 scenes)
Scene PSNR I SSIM I PSNR II SSIM II PSNR III SSIM III
scene_00 16.58 0.3251 12.51 0.0447 15.93 0.1214
scene_01 18.88 0.3252 13.74 0.0480 17.02 0.1162
scene_02 18.30 0.3298 13.37 0.0496 16.55 0.1259
scene_03 16.68 0.3248 12.53 0.0450 15.85 0.1262

Public Tier Leaderboard

# Method Score PSNR SSIM Consistency Trust Source
1 pCT-Former + gradient 0.751 30.15 0.919 0.91 ✓ Certified Proton CT transformer, 2024
2 ProtonNet + gradient 0.718 28.28 0.887 0.9 ✓ Certified Proton CT DL reconstruction, 2022
3 DROP-TVS + gradient 0.674 25.85 0.828 0.92 ✓ Certified Penfold et al., Med. Phys. 2010
4 FBP-MLP + gradient 0.547 20.95 0.643 0.9 ✓ Certified Schulte et al., Med. Phys. 2008

Visible Data Fields

y H_ideal spec_ranges x_true true_spec

Dataset

Format: HDF5
Scenes: 3

Scoring Formula

0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖)

PSNR: 40% SSIM: 40% Consistency: 20%
Back to Proton Radiography