Dev
PET — Dev Tier
(3 scenes)Blind evaluation tier — no ground truth available.
What you get
Measurements (y), ideal forward operator (H), and spec ranges only.
How to use
Apply your pipeline from the Public tier. Use consistency as self-check.
What to submit
Reconstructed signals and corrected spec. Scored server-side.
Parameter Specifications
🔒
True spec hidden — estimate parameters from spec ranges below.
| Parameter | Spec Range | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| attenuation | -6.0 – 9.0 | % |
| scatter_frac | 0.24 – 0.39 | |
| timing_res | 140.0 – 290.0 | ps |
| normalization | -2.4 – 3.6 | % |
Dev Tier Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM | Consistency | Trust | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PET-ViT + gradient | 0.778 | 33.2 | 0.954 | 0.82 | ✓ Certified | Smith et al., ICCV 2024 |
| 2 | U-Net-PET + gradient | 0.735 | 30.38 | 0.922 | 0.81 | ✓ Certified | Ronneberger et al. variant, MICCAI 2020 |
| 3 | PETFormer + gradient | 0.706 | 28.1 | 0.883 | 0.86 | ✓ Certified | Li et al., ECCV 2024 |
| 4 | TransEM + gradient | 0.679 | 27.19 | 0.863 | 0.81 | ✓ Certified | Xie et al., 2023 |
| 5 | DeepPET + gradient | 0.677 | 26.67 | 0.85 | 0.85 | ✓ Certified | Haggstrom et al., MIA 2019 |
| 6 | OS-EM + gradient | 0.666 | 26.03 | 0.833 | 0.86 | ✓ Certified | Hudson & Larkin, IEEE TMI 1994 |
| 7 | ML-EM + gradient | 0.651 | 25.56 | 0.819 | 0.84 | ✓ Certified | Shepp & Vardi, IEEE TPAMI 1982 |
| 8 | FBP-PET + gradient | 0.637 | 25.02 | 0.803 | 0.83 | ✓ Certified | Analytical baseline |
| 9 | MAPEM-RDP + gradient | 0.557 | 21.52 | 0.669 | 0.87 | ✓ Certified | Nuyts et al., IEEE TMI 2002 |
| 10 | OSEM + gradient | 0.556 | 21.33 | 0.661 | 0.89 | ✓ Certified | Hudson & Larkin, IEEE TMI 1994 |
Visible Data Fields
y
H_ideal
spec_ranges
Dataset
Format: HDF5
Scenes: 3
Scoring Formula
0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖)
PSNR: 40%
SSIM: 40%
Consistency: 20%