Public
OCT — Public Tier
(3 scenes)Full-access development tier with all data visible.
What you get
Measurements (y), ideal forward operator (H), spec ranges, ground truth (x_true), and true mismatch spec.
How to use
Load HDF5 → compare reconstruction vs x_true → check consistency → iterate.
What to submit
Reconstructed signals (x_hat) and corrected spec as HDF5.
Parameter Specifications
✓
True spec visible — use these exact values for Scenario III oracle reconstruction.
| Parameter | Spec Range | True Value | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| dispersion | -200.0 – 400.0 | 100.0 | fs² |
| reference_delay | -5.0 – 10.0 | 2.5 | μm |
| spectral_roll_off | -1.0 – 2.0 | 0.5 | dB/mm |
InverseNet Baseline Scores
Method: CPU_baseline — Mismatch parameter: nominal
Scenario I (Ideal)
24.44 dB
SSIM 0.8201
Scenario II (Mismatch)
19.91 dB
SSIM 0.6769
Scenario III (Oracle)
18.93 dB
SSIM 0.6208
Per-scene breakdown (4 scenes)
| Scene | PSNR I | SSIM I | PSNR II | SSIM II | PSNR III | SSIM III |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| scene_00 | 25.17 | 0.8356 | 20.54 | 0.6765 | 19.60 | 0.6342 |
| scene_01 | 24.16 | 0.8259 | 20.05 | 0.6783 | 18.86 | 0.6294 |
| scene_02 | 22.70 | 0.7592 | 18.35 | 0.6361 | 17.48 | 0.5424 |
| scene_03 | 25.71 | 0.8597 | 20.69 | 0.7166 | 19.79 | 0.6770 |
Public Tier Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM | Consistency | Trust | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ScoreOCT + gradient | 0.843 | 36.51 | 0.976 | 0.94 | ✓ Certified | Wei et al., ECCV 2025 |
| 2 | DiffusionOCT + gradient | 0.837 | 36.33 | 0.975 | 0.92 | ✓ Certified | Zhang et al., NeurIPS 2024 |
| 3 | RetinalFormer + gradient | 0.824 | 34.92 | 0.967 | 0.94 | ✓ Certified | Chen et al., ICCV 2024 |
| 4 | OCT-ViT + gradient | 0.819 | 34.39 | 0.964 | 0.95 | ✓ Certified | Tian et al., ICCV 2024 |
| 5 | SpeckleFormer + gradient | 0.806 | 34.31 | 0.963 | 0.89 | ✓ Certified | Devalla et al., ECCV 2024 |
| 6 | U-Net-OCT + gradient | 0.792 | 32.8 | 0.951 | 0.92 | ✓ Certified | Ronneberger et al., MICCAI 2015 (OCT variant) |
| 7 | OCTA-Net + gradient | 0.777 | 32.09 | 0.944 | 0.89 | ✓ Certified | Hybrid U-Net+Transformer, 2023 |
| 8 | Speckle-DenoiseNet + gradient | 0.752 | 30.11 | 0.918 | 0.92 | ✓ Certified | Devalla et al., BOE 2019 |
| 9 | NLM-OCT + gradient | 0.730 | 28.44 | 0.89 | 0.95 | ✓ Certified | Buades et al., Multiscale Model. Simul. 2005 |
| 10 | TV-Denoising + gradient | 0.706 | 27.48 | 0.869 | 0.92 | ✓ Certified | Rudin et al., Phys. A 1992 |
| 11 | BM4D + gradient | 0.687 | 26.8 | 0.853 | 0.89 | ✓ Certified | Maggioni et al., IEEE TIP 2013 |
| 12 | Speckle-Lee + gradient | 0.655 | 25.19 | 0.808 | 0.9 | ✓ Certified | Lee, IEEE TGRS 1980 |
| 13 | FFT-OCT + gradient | 0.612 | 23.61 | 0.754 | 0.87 | ✓ Certified | Analytical baseline |
Visible Data Fields
y
H_ideal
spec_ranges
x_true
true_spec
Dataset
Format: HDF5
Scenes: 3
Scoring Formula
0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖)
PSNR: 40%
SSIM: 40%
Consistency: 20%