Public
Holography — Public Tier
(5 scenes)Full-access development tier with all data visible.
What you get
Measurements (y), ideal forward operator (H), spec ranges, ground truth (x_true), and true mismatch spec.
How to use
Load HDF5 → compare reconstruction vs x_true → check consistency → iterate.
What to submit
Reconstructed signals (x_hat) and corrected spec as HDF5.
Parameter Specifications
✓
True spec visible — use these exact values for Scenario III oracle reconstruction.
| Parameter | Spec Range | True Value | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| wavelength | -0.5 – 1.0 | 0.25 | nm |
| prop_distance | -5.0 – 10.0 | 2.5 | μm |
| tilt | -0.5 – 1.0 | 0.25 | mrad |
InverseNet Baseline Scores
Method: CPU_baseline — Mismatch parameter: nominal
Scenario I (Ideal)
6.48 dB
SSIM 0.2992
Scenario II (Mismatch)
6.07 dB
SSIM 0.1771
Scenario III (Oracle)
5.02 dB
SSIM 0.0984
Per-scene breakdown (4 scenes)
| Scene | PSNR I | SSIM I | PSNR II | SSIM II | PSNR III | SSIM III |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| scene_00 | 4.96 | 0.4075 | 4.83 | 0.2182 | 5.36 | 0.1110 |
| scene_01 | 11.85 | 0.3168 | 10.00 | 0.1734 | 4.80 | 0.0434 |
| scene_02 | 4.98 | 0.0939 | 4.32 | 0.1092 | 4.85 | 0.1279 |
| scene_03 | 4.12 | 0.3788 | 5.12 | 0.2078 | 5.07 | 0.1111 |
Public Tier Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM | Consistency | Trust | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DiffusionPhase + gradient | 0.812 | 34.16 | 0.962 | 0.93 | ✓ Certified | Song et al., NeurIPS 2024 |
| 2 | ScorePhase + gradient | 0.794 | 33.52 | 0.957 | 0.88 | ✓ Certified | Wei et al., ECCV 2025 |
| 3 | HolographyViT + gradient | 0.785 | 32.7 | 0.95 | 0.89 | ✓ Certified | Wang et al., ICCV 2024 |
| 4 | AutoPhase++ + gradient | 0.784 | 33.06 | 0.953 | 0.86 | ✓ Certified | Rivenson et al., ECCV 2024 |
| 5 | PhaseResNet + gradient | 0.780 | 31.48 | 0.937 | 0.95 | ✓ Certified | Baoqing et al., Optica 2023 |
| 6 | LRGS + gradient | 0.778 | 31.78 | 0.94 | 0.92 | ✓ Certified | Choi et al., 2023 |
| 7 | PhaseFormer + gradient | 0.777 | 32.29 | 0.946 | 0.88 | ✓ Certified | Tian et al., ICCV 2024 |
| 8 | CyclePhase + gradient | 0.743 | 29.65 | 0.911 | 0.91 | ✓ Certified | Ge et al., IEEE Photonics 2023 |
| 9 | PhaseNet + gradient | 0.728 | 29.1 | 0.902 | 0.88 | ✓ Certified | Rivenson et al., LSA 2018 |
| 10 | prDeep + gradient | 0.653 | 25.27 | 0.811 | 0.88 | ✓ Certified | Metzler et al., ICML 2018 |
| 11 | deep-PR + gradient | 0.652 | 25.43 | 0.815 | 0.86 | ✓ Certified | Asif et al., ICCP 2017 |
| 12 | Error Reduction + gradient | 0.574 | 21.76 | 0.68 | 0.92 | ✓ Certified | Fienup, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 1982 |
| 13 | GS/HIO + gradient | 0.546 | 20.84 | 0.638 | 0.91 | ✓ Certified | Fienup, Appl. Opt. 1982 |
| 14 | Gerchberg-Saxton + gradient | 0.488 | 18.94 | 0.547 | 0.9 | ✓ Certified | Gerchberg & Saxton, Optik 1972 |
Visible Data Fields
y
H_ideal
spec_ranges
x_true
true_spec
Dataset
Format: HDF5
Scenes: 5
Scoring Formula
0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖)
PSNR: 40%
SSIM: 40%
Consistency: 20%