Public

Fluoroscopy — Public Tier

(3 scenes)

Full-access development tier with all data visible.

Measurements (y), ideal forward operator (H), spec ranges, ground truth (x_true), and true mismatch spec.

Load HDF5 → compare reconstruction vs x_true → check consistency → iterate.

Reconstructed signals (x_hat) and corrected spec as HDF5.

✓

True spec visible — use these exact values for Scenario III oracle reconstruction.

Parameter	Spec Range	True Value	Unit
motion_blur	-5.0 – 10.0	2.5	ms
lag	-3.0 – 6.0	1.5	ms
gain_drift	-0.5 – 1.0	0.25	%

Method: CPU_baseline — Mismatch parameter: nominal

14.88 dB

SSIM 0.2885

11.40 dB

SSIM 0.0410

14.64 dB

SSIM 0.1177

Per-scene breakdown (4 scenes)

Scene	PSNR I	SSIM I	PSNR II	SSIM II	PSNR III	SSIM III
scene_00	14.80	0.2898	11.38	0.0400	14.58	0.1169
scene_01	15.05	0.2857	11.41	0.0409	14.66	0.1169
scene_02	14.99	0.2846	11.40	0.0427	14.66	0.1192
scene_03	14.69	0.2938	11.40	0.0405	14.65	0.1180

#	Method	Score	PSNR	SSIM	Consistency	Trust	Source
1	DiffFluoro + gradient	0.847	37.61	0.981	0.89	✓ Certified	Gao et al., MICCAI 2024
2	PhysFluoro + gradient	0.831	36.33	0.975	0.89	✓ Certified	Chen et al., IEEE TMI 2024
3	SwinFluoro + gradient	0.816	34.73	0.966	0.91	✓ Certified	Li et al., Med. Phys. 2023
4	TransFluoro + gradient	0.802	34.27	0.963	0.87	✓ Certified	Wang et al., IEEE TMI 2022
5	REDCNN-Fluoro + gradient	0.771	32.02	0.943	0.87	✓ Certified	Chen et al., IEEE TMI 2017
6	DnCNN-Fluoro + gradient	0.763	30.4	0.923	0.95	✓ Certified	Chen et al., IEEE TMI 2017
7	TV-Fluoro + gradient	0.694	27.13	0.861	0.89	✓ Certified	Sidky & Pan, Phys. Med. Biol. 2008
8	NLM-Fluoro + gradient	0.650	25.14	0.807	0.88	✓ Certified	Buades et al., CVPR 2005
9	BM3D-Fluoro + gradient	0.610	23.4	0.746	0.89	✓ Certified	Dabov et al., IEEE TIP 2007

y H_ideal spec_ranges x_true true_spec

Format: HDF5

Scenes: 3

0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖)

PSNR: 40% SSIM: 40% Consistency: 20%