Public

Electron Holography — Public Tier

(3 scenes)

Full-access development tier with all data visible.

Measurements (y), ideal forward operator (H), spec ranges, ground truth (x_true), and true mismatch spec.

Load HDF5 → compare reconstruction vs x_true → check consistency → iterate.

Reconstructed signals (x_hat) and corrected spec as HDF5.

✓

True spec visible — use these exact values for Scenario III oracle reconstruction.

Parameter	Spec Range	True Value	Unit
biprism_voltage	-2.0 – 4.0	1.0	V
fringe_spacing	-0.1 – 0.2	0.05	nm
partial_coherence	-5.0 – 10.0	2.5	%

Method: CPU_baseline — Mismatch parameter: nominal

19.81 dB

SSIM 0.4840

17.13 dB

SSIM 0.0865

19.14 dB

SSIM 0.1862

Per-scene breakdown (4 scenes)

Scene	PSNR I	SSIM I	PSNR II	SSIM II	PSNR III	SSIM III
scene_00	19.40	0.4889	16.86	0.0892	19.02	0.1932
scene_01	20.39	0.4977	17.19	0.0846	19.00	0.1825
scene_02	20.11	0.4612	17.55	0.0813	19.72	0.1792
scene_03	19.34	0.4883	16.90	0.0911	18.84	0.1898

#	Method	Score	PSNR	SSIM	Consistency	Trust	Source
1	PhysHolo + gradient	0.841	36.49	0.976	0.93	✓ Certified	Chen et al., Nat. Commun. 2024
2	DiffHolo + gradient	0.837	37.02	0.978	0.88	✓ Certified	Gao et al., NeurIPS 2024
3	SwinHolo + gradient	0.826	35.37	0.97	0.92	✓ Certified	Wang et al., Ultramicroscopy 2023
4	TransHolo + gradient	0.805	33.44	0.956	0.94	✓ Certified	Li et al., Nat. Commun. 2022
5	DeepHolo + gradient	0.768	30.99	0.931	0.93	✓ Certified	Rivenson et al., Optica 2018
6	DnCNN-Holo + gradient	0.727	28.57	0.892	0.92	✓ Certified	Gao et al., Ultramicroscopy 2019
7	TV-Phase + gradient	0.668	25.5	0.818	0.93	✓ Certified	Beleggia et al., Ultramicroscopy 2004
8	WDD-Holo + gradient	0.610	23.14	0.737	0.92	✓ Certified	Lichte, Ultramicroscopy 1986
9	FFT-Holo + gradient	0.534	20.28	0.612	0.93	✓ Certified	Lehmann & Lichte, Microsc. Microanal. 2002

y H_ideal spec_ranges x_true true_spec

Format: HDF5

Scenes: 3

0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖)

PSNR: 40% SSIM: 40% Consistency: 20%