Hidden
EELS — Hidden Tier
(3 scenes)Fully blind server-side evaluation — no data download.
What you get
No data downloadable. Algorithm runs server-side on hidden measurements.
How to use
Package algorithm as Docker container / Python script. Submit via link.
What to submit
Containerized algorithm accepting y + H, outputting x_hat + corrected spec.
Parameter Specifications
🔒
True spec hidden — blind evaluation, only ranges available.
| Parameter | Spec Range | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| energy_dispersion | -0.0014 – 0.0046 | eV/channel |
| zero_loss_shift | -0.21 – 0.69 | eV |
| aberration | -1.4 – 4.6 | % |
Hidden Tier Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM | Consistency | Trust | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SwinEELS + gradient | 0.745 | 31.06 | 0.932 | 0.81 | ✓ Certified | Wang et al., npj Comput. Mater. 2023 |
| 2 | PhysEELS + gradient | 0.722 | 28.85 | 0.898 | 0.87 | ✓ Certified | Chen et al., Microsc. Microanal. 2024 |
| 3 | TransEELS + gradient | 0.694 | 28.56 | 0.892 | 0.76 | ✓ Certified | Li et al., Ultramicroscopy 2022 |
| 4 | DiffEELS + gradient | 0.654 | 26.34 | 0.841 | 0.77 | ✓ Certified | Gao et al., NeurIPS 2024 |
| 5 | N2V-EELS + gradient | 0.563 | 22.1 | 0.694 | 0.82 | ✓ Certified | Krull et al., NeurIPS 2019 |
| 6 | PowerLaw-EELS + gradient | 0.474 | 18.73 | 0.536 | 0.86 | ✓ Certified | Egerton, EELS in the EM, Springer 2011 |
| 7 | DnCNN-EELS + gradient | 0.448 | 18.4 | 0.52 | 0.78 | ✓ Certified | Kovarik et al., npj Comput. Mater. 2016 |
| 8 | MLS-EELS + gradient | 0.372 | 16.0 | 0.401 | 0.76 | ✓ Certified | Verbeeck & Van Aert, Ultramicroscopy 2004 |
| 9 | ICA-EELS + gradient | 0.310 | 13.77 | 0.3 | 0.76 | ✓ Certified | Bosman et al., Ultramicroscopy 2006 |
Dataset
Scenes: 3
Scoring Formula
0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖)
PSNR: 40%
SSIM: 40%
Consistency: 20%