Hidden
CT — Hidden Tier
(20 scenes)Fully blind: 20 real LoDoPaB-CT slices (validation split, patients 64–127) with adversarial modifications (metal inserts, lesions, calcifications).
What you get
No data download. Algorithm runs server-side on hidden measurements.
How to use
Package algorithm as Docker container / Python script accepting y + H, outputting x_hat + corrected spec.
What to submit
Containerized algorithm. Scored server-side against adversarial phantoms.
Parameter Specifications
🔒
True spec hidden — blind evaluation, only ranges available.
| Parameter | Spec Range | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| center_offset_px | -1.0 – 9.0 | px |
| angle_error_deg | -2.0 – 14.0 | deg |
| beam_hardening_beta | 0.07 – 0.37 | |
| detector_tilt_deg | -0.5 – 5.5 | deg |
Hidden Tier Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM | Consistency | Trust | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CT-FM + gradient | 0.795 | 33.58 | 0.958 | 0.88 | ✓ Certified | Wang et al., Nature MI 2026 |
| 2 | Score-CT + gradient | 0.791 | 33.62 | 0.958 | 0.86 | ✓ Certified | Gao et al., IEEE TMI 2024 |
| 3 | TransCT + gradient | 0.782 | 33.47 | 0.957 | 0.82 | ✓ Certified | Xia et al., MICCAI 2021 |
| 4 | CTformer + gradient | 0.771 | 33.11 | 0.954 | 0.79 | ✓ Certified | Wang et al., MICCAI 2023 |
| 5 | CT-MAE + gradient | 0.765 | 32.26 | 0.945 | 0.82 | ✓ Certified | Chen et al., MICCAI 2024 |
| 6 | PINER-CT + gradient | 0.757 | 32.17 | 0.944 | 0.79 | ✓ Certified | Sun et al., CVPR 2025 |
| 7 | DiffusionMBIR + gradient | 0.731 | 29.52 | 0.909 | 0.86 | ✓ Certified | Song et al., arXiv 2024 |
| 8 | iCT-Net + gradient | 0.723 | 29.5 | 0.909 | 0.82 | ✓ Certified | Li et al., IEEE TMI 2019 |
| 9 | DuDoRNet + gradient | 0.718 | 29.92 | 0.916 | 0.76 | ✓ Certified | Zhou et al., CVPR 2020 |
| 10 | Eformer + gradient | 0.711 | 29.42 | 0.908 | 0.77 | ✓ Certified | Wang et al., AAAI 2022 |
| 11 | LEARN + gradient | 0.711 | 28.35 | 0.888 | 0.86 | ✓ Certified | Chen et al., IEEE TPAMI 2018 |
| 12 | PnP-ADMM + gradient | 0.706 | 28.55 | 0.892 | 0.82 | ✓ Certified | Venkatakrishnan et al., GlobalSIP 2013 |
| 13 | BM3D-CT + gradient | 0.660 | 25.85 | 0.828 | 0.85 | ✓ Certified | Dabov et al., IEEE TIP 2007; Chen 2014 |
| 14 | SART + gradient | 0.652 | 25.88 | 0.829 | 0.81 | ✓ Certified | Andersen & Kak, Ultrason. Imaging 1984 |
| 15 | CGLS + gradient | 0.643 | 25.35 | 0.813 | 0.82 | ✓ Certified | Bjorck, SIAM 1996 |
| 16 | DLCT + gradient | 0.598 | 23.95 | 0.767 | 0.76 | ✓ Certified | Xu et al., IEEE TMI 2012 |
| 17 | RED-CNN + gradient | 0.597 | 23.18 | 0.738 | 0.85 | ✓ Certified | Chen et al., IEEE TMI 2017 |
| 18 | WGAN-CT + gradient | 0.593 | 23.42 | 0.747 | 0.8 | ✓ Certified | Wolterink et al., IEEE TMI 2017 |
| 19 | CT-U-Net + gradient | 0.575 | 23.02 | 0.732 | 0.76 | ✓ Certified | Han et al., Phys. Med. Biol. 2016 |
| 20 | OSEM + gradient | 0.573 | 23.02 | 0.732 | 0.75 | ✓ Certified | Hudson & Larkin, IEEE TMI 1994 |
| 21 | FBPConvNet + gradient | 0.563 | 22.1 | 0.694 | 0.82 | ✓ Certified | Jin et al., IEEE TMI 2017 |
| 22 | FBP + gradient | 0.489 | 19.92 | 0.595 | 0.76 | ✓ Certified | Kak & Slaney, IEEE Press 1988 |
| 23 | TV-ADMM + gradient | 0.473 | 19.37 | 0.568 | 0.76 | ✓ Certified | Sidky & Pan, Phys. Med. Biol. 2008 |
| 24 | ART-TV + gradient | 0.453 | 18.02 | 0.501 | 0.86 | ✓ Certified | Li et al., Med. Phys. 2004 |
Dataset
Scenes: 20
Scoring Formula
0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖)
PSNR: 40%
SSIM: 40%
Consistency: 20%