Public
CBCT — Public Tier
(10 scenes)Full-access tier: 10 real CBCT/CT volumes from AAPM, LIDC-IDRI, CBCTLiTS, MMDental, CTooth+, 2DeteCT, HTC, Walnut CT, CQ500, DM4CT.
What you get
Cone-beam projections (y), ideal geometry (H), spec ranges, ground truth volume (x_true), and true mismatch spec.
How to use
Load cbct_challenge_public.h5 → reconstruct 256³ volume from projections → compare with x_true → iterate on mismatch correction.
What to submit
Reconstructed volumes (x_hat) and corrected mismatch spec as HDF5.
Parameter Specifications
✓
True spec visible — use these exact values for Scenario III oracle reconstruction.
| Parameter | Spec Range | True Value | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| source_offset_x | -1.2 – 2.8 | 0.8 | mm |
| source_offset_z | -1.0 – 2.0 | 0.5 | mm |
| detector_tilt | -0.35 – 0.65 | 0.15 | deg |
| detector_shift_u | -1.8 – 4.2 | 1.2 | px |
| beam_hardening | -0.015 – 0.135 | 0.06 | |
| scatter_fraction | -0.01 – 0.09 | 0.04 |
InverseNet Baseline Scores
Method: CPU_baseline — Mismatch parameter: nominal
Scenario I (Ideal)
14.88 dB
SSIM 0.2885
Scenario II (Mismatch)
11.40 dB
SSIM 0.0410
Scenario III (Oracle)
14.64 dB
SSIM 0.1177
Per-scene breakdown (4 scenes)
| Scene | PSNR I | SSIM I | PSNR II | SSIM II | PSNR III | SSIM III |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| scene_00 | 14.80 | 0.2898 | 11.38 | 0.0400 | 14.58 | 0.1169 |
| scene_01 | 15.05 | 0.2857 | 11.41 | 0.0409 | 14.66 | 0.1169 |
| scene_02 | 14.99 | 0.2846 | 11.40 | 0.0427 | 14.66 | 0.1192 |
| scene_03 | 14.69 | 0.2938 | 11.40 | 0.0405 | 14.65 | 0.1180 |
Public Tier Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM | Consistency | Trust | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DiffusionCBCT + gradient | 0.848 | 37.92 | 0.982 | 0.88 | ✓ Certified | Gao et al., Med. Phys. 2024 |
| 2 | CTFormer + gradient | 0.835 | 36.97 | 0.978 | 0.87 | ✓ Certified | Wang et al., MICCAI 2023 |
| 3 | DuDoTrans + gradient | 0.823 | 35.31 | 0.97 | 0.91 | ✓ Certified | Wang et al., IEEE TMI 2022 |
| 4 | Metal-AR-Net + gradient | 0.818 | 34.72 | 0.966 | 0.92 | ✓ Certified | Zhang & Yu, IEEE TMI 2018 |
| 5 | DuDoNet + gradient | 0.811 | 34.53 | 0.965 | 0.9 | ✓ Certified | Lin et al., CVPR 2019 |
| 6 | Learned Primal-Dual + gradient | 0.804 | 34.48 | 0.964 | 0.87 | ✓ Certified | Adler & Oktem, IEEE TMI 2018 |
| 7 | FBPConvNet + gradient | 0.774 | 31.78 | 0.94 | 0.9 | ✓ Certified | Jin et al., IEEE TIP 2017 |
| 8 | TV-ADMM + gradient | 0.749 | 29.63 | 0.911 | 0.94 | ✓ Certified | Boyd et al., Found. Trends 2011 |
| 9 | FDK + gradient | 0.685 | 26.2 | 0.838 | 0.94 | ✓ Certified | Feldkamp et al., J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 1984 |
Visible Data Fields
y
H_ideal
spec_ranges
x_true
true_spec
Dataset
Format: HDF5
Scenes: 10
Scoring Formula
0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖)
PSNR: 40%
SSIM: 40%
Consistency: 20%