Dev
Brachytherapy Imaging — Dev Tier
(3 scenes)Blind evaluation tier — no ground truth available.
What you get
Measurements (y), ideal forward operator (H), and spec ranges only.
How to use
Apply your pipeline from the Public tier. Use consistency as self-check.
What to submit
Reconstructed signals and corrected spec. Scored server-side.
Parameter Specifications
🔒
True spec hidden — estimate parameters from spec ranges below.
| Parameter | Spec Range | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| source_position_error | -0.48 – 0.72 | mm |
| attenuation_coefficient | 0.188 – 0.218 | 1/cm |
| detector_gain_drift | 0.988 – 1.018 | - |
| scatter_fraction | 0.126 – 0.186 | - |
Dev Tier Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM | Consistency | Trust | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DiffusionSeed + gradient | 0.777 | 32.87 | 0.951 | 0.84 | ✓ Certified | Gao et al., Med. Phys. 2024 |
| 2 | CTFormer + gradient | 0.765 | 31.59 | 0.938 | 0.87 | ✓ Certified | Wang et al., MICCAI 2023 |
| 3 | DuDoTrans + gradient | 0.758 | 31.95 | 0.942 | 0.81 | ✓ Certified | Wang et al., IEEE TMI 2022 |
| 4 | Learned Primal-Dual + gradient | 0.750 | 31.08 | 0.932 | 0.83 | ✓ Certified | Adler & Oktem, IEEE TMI 2018 |
| 5 | Metal-AR-Net + gradient | 0.712 | 28.55 | 0.892 | 0.85 | ✓ Certified | Zhang & Yu, IEEE TMI 2018 |
| 6 | FBPConvNet + gradient | 0.695 | 27.59 | 0.872 | 0.85 | ✓ Certified | Jin et al., IEEE TIP 2017 |
| 7 | RED-CNN + gradient | 0.687 | 27.8 | 0.877 | 0.79 | ✓ Certified | Chen et al., IEEE TMI 2017 |
| 8 | FDK + gradient | 0.639 | 24.64 | 0.791 | 0.88 | ✓ Certified | Feldkamp et al., J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 1984 |
| 9 | TV-ADMM + gradient | 0.597 | 23.56 | 0.753 | 0.8 | ✓ Certified | Boyd et al., Found. Trends Mach. Learn. 2011 |
Visible Data Fields
y
H_ideal
spec_ranges
Dataset
Format: HDF5
Scenes: 3
Scoring Formula
0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖)
PSNR: 40%
SSIM: 40%
Consistency: 20%