Brachytherapy Imaging

Brachytherapy Imaging

Standard reconstruction benchmark — forward model perfectly known, no calibration needed. Score = 0.5 × clip((PSNR−15)/30, 0, 1) + 0.5 × SSIM

# Method Score PSNR (dB) SSIM Source
🥇 DiffusionSeed 0.906 40.3 0.968 ✓ Certified Gao et al., Med. Phys. 2024
🥈 CTFormer 0.880 39.1 0.957 ✓ Certified Wang et al., MICCAI 2023
🥉 DuDoTrans 0.861 38.2 0.948 ✓ Certified Wang et al., IEEE TMI 2022
4 Learned Primal-Dual 0.834 37.0 0.935 ✓ Certified Adler & Oktem, IEEE TMI 2018
5 Metal-AR-Net 0.821 36.4 0.928 ✓ Certified Zhang & Yu, IEEE TMI 2018
6 RED-CNN 0.791 35.1 0.912 ✓ Certified Chen et al., IEEE TMI 2017
7 FBPConvNet 0.768 34.2 0.895 ✓ Certified Jin et al., IEEE TIP 2017
8 TV-ADMM 0.711 31.8 0.861 ✓ Certified Boyd et al., Found. Trends Mach. Learn. 2011
9 FDK 0.631 28.5 0.812 ✓ Certified Feldkamp et al., J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 1984

Dataset: PWM Benchmark (9 algorithms)

Blind Reconstruction Challenge — forward model has unknown mismatch, must calibrate from data. Score = 0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖)

# Method Overall Score Public
PSNR / SSIM
Dev
PSNR / SSIM
Hidden
PSNR / SSIM
Trust Source
🥇 DiffusionSeed + gradient 0.785
0.849
38.22 dB / 0.983
0.777
32.87 dB / 0.951
0.729
30.38 dB / 0.922
✓ Certified Gao et al., Med. Phys. 2024
🥈 CTFormer + gradient 0.764
0.837
36.99 dB / 0.978
0.765
31.59 dB / 0.938
0.691
27.62 dB / 0.873
✓ Certified Wang et al., MICCAI 2023
🥉 DuDoTrans + gradient 0.763
0.825
35.97 dB / 0.973
0.758
31.95 dB / 0.942
0.705
28.72 dB / 0.895
✓ Certified Wang et al., IEEE TMI 2022
4 Learned Primal-Dual + gradient 0.762
0.830
35.38 dB / 0.970
0.750
31.08 dB / 0.932
0.707
29.18 dB / 0.903
✓ Certified Adler & Oktem, IEEE TMI 2018
5 Metal-AR-Net + gradient 0.725
0.802
33.99 dB / 0.961
0.712
28.55 dB / 0.892
0.660
25.59 dB / 0.820
✓ Certified Zhang & Yu, IEEE TMI 2018
6 RED-CNN + gradient 0.722
0.809
34.05 dB / 0.961
0.687
27.8 dB / 0.877
0.671
26.21 dB / 0.838
✓ Certified Chen et al., IEEE TMI 2017
7 FBPConvNet + gradient 0.697
0.771
31.89 dB / 0.941
0.695
27.59 dB / 0.872
0.625
24.74 dB / 0.794
✓ Certified Jin et al., IEEE TIP 2017
8 FDK + gradient 0.635
0.672
26.03 dB / 0.833
0.639
24.64 dB / 0.791
0.594
23.87 dB / 0.764
✓ Certified Feldkamp et al., J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 1984
9 TV-ADMM + gradient 0.626
0.733
29.3 dB / 0.906
0.597
23.56 dB / 0.753
0.549
21.6 dB / 0.673
✓ Certified Boyd et al., Found. Trends Mach. Learn. 2011

Complete score requires all 3 tiers (Public + Dev + Hidden).

Join the competition →
Scoring: 0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖) PSNR 40% · SSIM 40% · Consistency 20%
Public 3 scenes

Full-access development tier with all data visible.

What you get & how to use

What you get: Measurements (y), ideal forward operator (H), spec ranges, ground truth (x_true), and true mismatch spec.

How to use: Load HDF5 → compare reconstruction vs x_true → check consistency → iterate.

What to submit: Reconstructed signals (x_hat) and corrected spec as HDF5.

Public Leaderboard
# Method Score PSNR SSIM
1 DiffusionSeed + gradient 0.849 38.22 0.983
2 CTFormer + gradient 0.837 36.99 0.978
3 Learned Primal-Dual + gradient 0.830 35.38 0.97
4 DuDoTrans + gradient 0.825 35.97 0.973
5 RED-CNN + gradient 0.809 34.05 0.961
6 Metal-AR-Net + gradient 0.802 33.99 0.961
7 FBPConvNet + gradient 0.771 31.89 0.941
8 TV-ADMM + gradient 0.733 29.3 0.906
9 FDK + gradient 0.672 26.03 0.833
Spec Ranges (4 parameters)
Parameter Min Max Unit
source_position_error -0.4 0.8 mm
attenuation_coefficient 0.19 0.22 1/cm
detector_gain_drift 0.99 1.02 -
scatter_fraction 0.13 0.19 -
Dev 3 scenes

Blind evaluation tier — no ground truth available.

What you get & how to use

What you get: Measurements (y), ideal forward operator (H), and spec ranges only.

How to use: Apply your pipeline from the Public tier. Use consistency as self-check.

What to submit: Reconstructed signals and corrected spec. Scored server-side.

Dev Leaderboard
# Method Score PSNR SSIM
1 DiffusionSeed + gradient 0.777 32.87 0.951
2 CTFormer + gradient 0.765 31.59 0.938
3 DuDoTrans + gradient 0.758 31.95 0.942
4 Learned Primal-Dual + gradient 0.750 31.08 0.932
5 Metal-AR-Net + gradient 0.712 28.55 0.892
6 FBPConvNet + gradient 0.695 27.59 0.872
7 RED-CNN + gradient 0.687 27.8 0.877
8 FDK + gradient 0.639 24.64 0.791
9 TV-ADMM + gradient 0.597 23.56 0.753
Spec Ranges (4 parameters)
Parameter Min Max Unit
source_position_error -0.48 0.72 mm
attenuation_coefficient 0.188 0.218 1/cm
detector_gain_drift 0.988 1.018 -
scatter_fraction 0.126 0.186 -
Hidden 3 scenes

Fully blind server-side evaluation — no data download.

What you get & how to use

What you get: No data downloadable. Algorithm runs server-side on hidden measurements.

How to use: Package algorithm as Docker container / Python script. Submit via link.

What to submit: Containerized algorithm accepting y + H, outputting x_hat + corrected spec.

Hidden Leaderboard
# Method Score PSNR SSIM
1 DiffusionSeed + gradient 0.729 30.38 0.922
2 Learned Primal-Dual + gradient 0.707 29.18 0.903
3 DuDoTrans + gradient 0.705 28.72 0.895
4 CTFormer + gradient 0.691 27.62 0.873
5 RED-CNN + gradient 0.671 26.21 0.838
6 Metal-AR-Net + gradient 0.660 25.59 0.82
7 FBPConvNet + gradient 0.625 24.74 0.794
8 FDK + gradient 0.594 23.87 0.764
9 TV-ADMM + gradient 0.549 21.6 0.673
Spec Ranges (4 parameters)
Parameter Min Max Unit
source_position_error -0.28 0.92 mm
attenuation_coefficient 0.193 0.223 1/cm
detector_gain_drift 0.993 1.023 -
scatter_fraction 0.136 0.196 -

Blind Reconstruction Challenge

Challenge

Given measurements with unknown mismatch and spec ranges (not exact params), reconstruct the original signal. A method must be evaluated on all three tiers for a complete score. Scored on a composite metric: 0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖).

Input

Measurements y, ideal forward model H, spec ranges

Output

Reconstructed signal x̂

Spec DAG — Forward Model Pipeline

Π → D

Π Projection
D Detector

Mismatch Parameters

Symbol Parameter Description Nominal Perturbed
s_p source_position_error Source position error (mm) 0.0 0.4
a_c attenuation_coefficient Attenuation coefficient (1/cm) 0.2 0.21
d_g detector_gain_drift Detector gain drift (-) 1.0 1.01
s_f scatter_fraction Scatter fraction (-) 0.15 0.17

Credits System

40%
Platform Profit Pool
Revenue allocated to benchmark rewards
30%
Winner Share
Top algorithm receives from pool
$100
Min Withdrawal
Minimum payout threshold
Spec Primitives Reference (11 primitives)
P Propagation

Free-space or medium propagation kernel (Fresnel, Rayleigh-Sommerfeld).

M Mask / Modulation

Spatial or spatio-temporal amplitude modulation (coded aperture, SLM pattern).

Π Projection

Geometric projection operator (Radon transform, fan-beam, cone-beam).

F Fourier Sampling

Sampling in the Fourier / k-space domain (MRI, ptychography).

C Convolution

Shift-invariant convolution with a point-spread function (PSF).

Σ Summation / Integration

Summation along a physical dimension (spectral, temporal, angular).

D Detector

Sensor readout with gain g and noise model η (Gaussian, Poisson, mixed).

S Structured Illumination

Patterned illumination (block, Hadamard, random) applied to the scene.

W Wavelength Dispersion

Spectral dispersion element (prism, grating) with shift α and aperture a.

R Rotation / Motion

Sample or gantry rotation (CT, electron tomography).

Λ Wavelength Selection

Spectral filter or monochromator selecting a wavelength band.