Brachytherapy Imaging
Brachytherapy Imaging
Standard reconstruction benchmark — forward model perfectly known, no calibration needed. Score = 0.5 × clip((PSNR−15)/30, 0, 1) + 0.5 × SSIM
| # | Method | Score | PSNR (dB) | SSIM | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🥇 |
DiffusionSeed
DiffusionSeed Gao et al., Med. Phys. 2024
40.3 dB
SSIM 0.968
Checkpoint unavailable
|
0.906 | 40.3 | 0.968 | ✓ Certified | Gao et al., Med. Phys. 2024 |
| 🥈 |
CTFormer
CTFormer Wang et al., MICCAI 2023
39.1 dB
SSIM 0.957
Checkpoint unavailable
|
0.880 | 39.1 | 0.957 | ✓ Certified | Wang et al., MICCAI 2023 |
| 🥉 |
DuDoTrans
DuDoTrans Wang et al., IEEE TMI 2022
38.2 dB
SSIM 0.948
Checkpoint unavailable
|
0.861 | 38.2 | 0.948 | ✓ Certified | Wang et al., IEEE TMI 2022 |
| 4 |
Learned Primal-Dual
Learned Primal-Dual Adler & Oktem, IEEE TMI 2018
37.0 dB
SSIM 0.935
Checkpoint unavailable
|
0.834 | 37.0 | 0.935 | ✓ Certified | Adler & Oktem, IEEE TMI 2018 |
| 5 |
Metal-AR-Net
Metal-AR-Net Zhang & Yu, IEEE TMI 2018
36.4 dB
SSIM 0.928
Checkpoint unavailable
|
0.821 | 36.4 | 0.928 | ✓ Certified | Zhang & Yu, IEEE TMI 2018 |
| 6 |
RED-CNN
RED-CNN Chen et al., IEEE TMI 2017
35.1 dB
SSIM 0.912
Checkpoint unavailable
|
0.791 | 35.1 | 0.912 | ✓ Certified | Chen et al., IEEE TMI 2017 |
| 7 |
FBPConvNet
FBPConvNet Jin et al., IEEE TIP 2017
34.2 dB
SSIM 0.895
Checkpoint unavailable
|
0.768 | 34.2 | 0.895 | ✓ Certified | Jin et al., IEEE TIP 2017 |
| 8 | TV-ADMM | 0.711 | 31.8 | 0.861 | ✓ Certified | Boyd et al., Found. Trends Mach. Learn. 2011 |
| 9 | FDK | 0.631 | 28.5 | 0.812 | ✓ Certified | Feldkamp et al., J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 1984 |
Dataset: PWM Benchmark (9 algorithms)
Blind Reconstruction Challenge — forward model has unknown mismatch, must calibrate from data. Score = 0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖)
| # | Method | Overall Score | Public PSNR / SSIM |
Dev PSNR / SSIM |
Hidden PSNR / SSIM |
Trust | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🥇 | DiffusionSeed + gradient | 0.785 |
0.849
38.22 dB / 0.983
|
0.777
32.87 dB / 0.951
|
0.729
30.38 dB / 0.922
|
✓ Certified | Gao et al., Med. Phys. 2024 |
| 🥈 | CTFormer + gradient | 0.764 |
0.837
36.99 dB / 0.978
|
0.765
31.59 dB / 0.938
|
0.691
27.62 dB / 0.873
|
✓ Certified | Wang et al., MICCAI 2023 |
| 🥉 | DuDoTrans + gradient | 0.763 |
0.825
35.97 dB / 0.973
|
0.758
31.95 dB / 0.942
|
0.705
28.72 dB / 0.895
|
✓ Certified | Wang et al., IEEE TMI 2022 |
| 4 | Learned Primal-Dual + gradient | 0.762 |
0.830
35.38 dB / 0.970
|
0.750
31.08 dB / 0.932
|
0.707
29.18 dB / 0.903
|
✓ Certified | Adler & Oktem, IEEE TMI 2018 |
| 5 | Metal-AR-Net + gradient | 0.725 |
0.802
33.99 dB / 0.961
|
0.712
28.55 dB / 0.892
|
0.660
25.59 dB / 0.820
|
✓ Certified | Zhang & Yu, IEEE TMI 2018 |
| 6 | RED-CNN + gradient | 0.722 |
0.809
34.05 dB / 0.961
|
0.687
27.8 dB / 0.877
|
0.671
26.21 dB / 0.838
|
✓ Certified | Chen et al., IEEE TMI 2017 |
| 7 | FBPConvNet + gradient | 0.697 |
0.771
31.89 dB / 0.941
|
0.695
27.59 dB / 0.872
|
0.625
24.74 dB / 0.794
|
✓ Certified | Jin et al., IEEE TIP 2017 |
| 8 | FDK + gradient | 0.635 |
0.672
26.03 dB / 0.833
|
0.639
24.64 dB / 0.791
|
0.594
23.87 dB / 0.764
|
✓ Certified | Feldkamp et al., J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 1984 |
| 9 | TV-ADMM + gradient | 0.626 |
0.733
29.3 dB / 0.906
|
0.597
23.56 dB / 0.753
|
0.549
21.6 dB / 0.673
|
✓ Certified | Boyd et al., Found. Trends Mach. Learn. 2011 |
Complete score requires all 3 tiers (Public + Dev + Hidden).
Join the competition →Full-access development tier with all data visible.
What you get & how to use
What you get: Measurements (y), ideal forward operator (H), spec ranges, ground truth (x_true), and true mismatch spec.
How to use: Load HDF5 → compare reconstruction vs x_true → check consistency → iterate.
What to submit: Reconstructed signals (x_hat) and corrected spec as HDF5.
Public Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DiffusionSeed + gradient | 0.849 | 38.22 | 0.983 |
| 2 | CTFormer + gradient | 0.837 | 36.99 | 0.978 |
| 3 | Learned Primal-Dual + gradient | 0.830 | 35.38 | 0.97 |
| 4 | DuDoTrans + gradient | 0.825 | 35.97 | 0.973 |
| 5 | RED-CNN + gradient | 0.809 | 34.05 | 0.961 |
| 6 | Metal-AR-Net + gradient | 0.802 | 33.99 | 0.961 |
| 7 | FBPConvNet + gradient | 0.771 | 31.89 | 0.941 |
| 8 | TV-ADMM + gradient | 0.733 | 29.3 | 0.906 |
| 9 | FDK + gradient | 0.672 | 26.03 | 0.833 |
Spec Ranges (4 parameters)
| Parameter | Min | Max | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| source_position_error | -0.4 | 0.8 | mm |
| attenuation_coefficient | 0.19 | 0.22 | 1/cm |
| detector_gain_drift | 0.99 | 1.02 | - |
| scatter_fraction | 0.13 | 0.19 | - |
Blind evaluation tier — no ground truth available.
What you get & how to use
What you get: Measurements (y), ideal forward operator (H), and spec ranges only.
How to use: Apply your pipeline from the Public tier. Use consistency as self-check.
What to submit: Reconstructed signals and corrected spec. Scored server-side.
Dev Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DiffusionSeed + gradient | 0.777 | 32.87 | 0.951 |
| 2 | CTFormer + gradient | 0.765 | 31.59 | 0.938 |
| 3 | DuDoTrans + gradient | 0.758 | 31.95 | 0.942 |
| 4 | Learned Primal-Dual + gradient | 0.750 | 31.08 | 0.932 |
| 5 | Metal-AR-Net + gradient | 0.712 | 28.55 | 0.892 |
| 6 | FBPConvNet + gradient | 0.695 | 27.59 | 0.872 |
| 7 | RED-CNN + gradient | 0.687 | 27.8 | 0.877 |
| 8 | FDK + gradient | 0.639 | 24.64 | 0.791 |
| 9 | TV-ADMM + gradient | 0.597 | 23.56 | 0.753 |
Spec Ranges (4 parameters)
| Parameter | Min | Max | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| source_position_error | -0.48 | 0.72 | mm |
| attenuation_coefficient | 0.188 | 0.218 | 1/cm |
| detector_gain_drift | 0.988 | 1.018 | - |
| scatter_fraction | 0.126 | 0.186 | - |
Fully blind server-side evaluation — no data download.
What you get & how to use
What you get: No data downloadable. Algorithm runs server-side on hidden measurements.
How to use: Package algorithm as Docker container / Python script. Submit via link.
What to submit: Containerized algorithm accepting y + H, outputting x_hat + corrected spec.
Hidden Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DiffusionSeed + gradient | 0.729 | 30.38 | 0.922 |
| 2 | Learned Primal-Dual + gradient | 0.707 | 29.18 | 0.903 |
| 3 | DuDoTrans + gradient | 0.705 | 28.72 | 0.895 |
| 4 | CTFormer + gradient | 0.691 | 27.62 | 0.873 |
| 5 | RED-CNN + gradient | 0.671 | 26.21 | 0.838 |
| 6 | Metal-AR-Net + gradient | 0.660 | 25.59 | 0.82 |
| 7 | FBPConvNet + gradient | 0.625 | 24.74 | 0.794 |
| 8 | FDK + gradient | 0.594 | 23.87 | 0.764 |
| 9 | TV-ADMM + gradient | 0.549 | 21.6 | 0.673 |
Spec Ranges (4 parameters)
| Parameter | Min | Max | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| source_position_error | -0.28 | 0.92 | mm |
| attenuation_coefficient | 0.193 | 0.223 | 1/cm |
| detector_gain_drift | 0.993 | 1.023 | - |
| scatter_fraction | 0.136 | 0.196 | - |
Blind Reconstruction Challenge
ChallengeGiven measurements with unknown mismatch and spec ranges (not exact params), reconstruct the original signal. A method must be evaluated on all three tiers for a complete score. Scored on a composite metric: 0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖).
Measurements y, ideal forward model H, spec ranges
Reconstructed signal x̂
Spec DAG — Forward Model Pipeline
Π → D
Mismatch Parameters
| Symbol | Parameter | Description | Nominal | Perturbed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| s_p | source_position_error | Source position error (mm) | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| a_c | attenuation_coefficient | Attenuation coefficient (1/cm) | 0.2 | 0.21 |
| d_g | detector_gain_drift | Detector gain drift (-) | 1.0 | 1.01 |
| s_f | scatter_fraction | Scatter fraction (-) | 0.15 | 0.17 |
Credits System
Spec Primitives Reference (11 primitives)
Free-space or medium propagation kernel (Fresnel, Rayleigh-Sommerfeld).
Spatial or spatio-temporal amplitude modulation (coded aperture, SLM pattern).
Geometric projection operator (Radon transform, fan-beam, cone-beam).
Sampling in the Fourier / k-space domain (MRI, ptychography).
Shift-invariant convolution with a point-spread function (PSF).
Summation along a physical dimension (spectral, temporal, angular).
Sensor readout with gain g and noise model η (Gaussian, Poisson, mixed).
Patterned illumination (block, Hadamard, random) applied to the scene.
Spectral dispersion element (prism, grating) with shift α and aperture a.
Sample or gantry rotation (CT, electron tomography).
Spectral filter or monochromator selecting a wavelength band.