Public
X-ray Angiography — Public Tier
(3 scenes)Full-access development tier with all data visible.
What you get
Measurements (y), ideal forward operator (H), spec ranges, ground truth (x_true), and true mismatch spec.
How to use
Load HDF5 → compare reconstruction vs x_true → check consistency → iterate.
What to submit
Reconstructed signals (x_hat) and corrected spec as HDF5.
Parameter Specifications
✓
True spec visible — use these exact values for Scenario III oracle reconstruction.
| Parameter | Spec Range | True Value | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| contrast_timing | -0.5 – 1.0 | 0.25 | s |
| motion | -2.0 – 4.0 | 1.0 | mm |
| scatter | -0.05 – 0.1 | 0.025 |
InverseNet Baseline Scores
Method: CPU_baseline — Mismatch parameter: nominal
Scenario I (Ideal)
14.88 dB
SSIM 0.2885
Scenario II (Mismatch)
11.40 dB
SSIM 0.0410
Scenario III (Oracle)
14.64 dB
SSIM 0.1177
Per-scene breakdown (4 scenes)
| Scene | PSNR I | SSIM I | PSNR II | SSIM II | PSNR III | SSIM III |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| scene_00 | 14.80 | 0.2898 | 11.38 | 0.0400 | 14.58 | 0.1169 |
| scene_01 | 15.05 | 0.2857 | 11.41 | 0.0409 | 14.66 | 0.1169 |
| scene_02 | 14.99 | 0.2846 | 11.40 | 0.0427 | 14.66 | 0.1192 |
| scene_03 | 14.69 | 0.2938 | 11.40 | 0.0405 | 14.65 | 0.1180 |
Public Tier Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM | Consistency | Trust | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DiffusionAngio + gradient | 0.830 | 35.7 | 0.972 | 0.92 | ✓ Certified | Shen et al., Med. Image Anal. 94:103102, 2024 |
| 2 | NeRF-Angio + gradient | 0.818 | 34.78 | 0.966 | 0.92 | ✓ Certified | Wang et al., IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 43:1401, 2024 |
| 3 | VesselNet + gradient | 0.809 | 33.92 | 0.96 | 0.93 | ✓ Certified | Zhang et al., Radiology AI 6:e230298, 2024 |
| 4 | AngioFormer + gradient | 0.799 | 33.43 | 0.956 | 0.91 | ✓ Certified | Geometry-aware transformer for few-view 3DRA, 2024 |
| 5 | FBPConvNet + gradient | 0.787 | 32.27 | 0.946 | 0.93 | ✓ Certified | Jin et al., IEEE TIP 26:4509, 2017 |
| 6 | Learned Primal-Dual + gradient | 0.778 | 32.48 | 0.948 | 0.87 | ✓ Certified | Adler & Oktem, IEEE TMI 37:1322, 2018 |
| 7 | PnP-ADMM + gradient | 0.742 | 30.07 | 0.918 | 0.87 | ✓ Certified | Venkatakrishnan et al., IEEE GlobalSIP 2013 |
| 8 | TV-CS + gradient | 0.716 | 28.65 | 0.894 | 0.86 | ✓ Certified | Rudin et al., Physica D 60:259, 1992; Sidky et al., PMB 2008 |
| 9 | FDK + gradient | 0.646 | 25.05 | 0.804 | 0.87 | ✓ Certified | Feldkamp et al., JOSA A 1(6):612, 1984 |
Visible Data Fields
y
H_ideal
spec_ranges
x_true
true_spec
Dataset
Format: HDF5
Scenes: 3
Scoring Formula
0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖)
PSNR: 40%
SSIM: 40%
Consistency: 20%