Acoustic Emission Testing (AE)
Acoustic Emission Testing (AE)
Standard reconstruction benchmark — forward model perfectly known, no calibration needed. Score = 0.5 × clip((PSNR−15)/30, 0, 1) + 0.5 × SSIM
| # | Method | Score | PSNR (dB) | SSIM | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🥇 |
DiffusionAE
DiffusionAE Song et al., ICLR 2021; SHM application 2024
35.5 dB
SSIM 0.950
Checkpoint unavailable
|
0.817 | 35.5 | 0.950 | ✓ Certified | Song et al., ICLR 2021; SHM application 2024 |
| 🥈 |
SwinIR-AE
SwinIR-AE Liang et al., ICCV 2021; AE-adapted 2024
34.8 dB
SSIM 0.940
Checkpoint unavailable
|
0.800 | 34.8 | 0.940 | ✓ Certified | Liang et al., ICCV 2021; AE-adapted 2024 |
| 🥉 |
PINN-AE
PINN-AE Raissi et al. 2019; AE extension 2024
33.5 dB
SSIM 0.925
Checkpoint unavailable
|
0.771 | 33.5 | 0.925 | ✓ Certified | Raissi et al. 2019; AE extension 2024 |
| 4 |
Domain-Adapted ResNet
Domain-Adapted ResNet Tabian et al., Sensors 2019
32.0 dB
SSIM 0.905
Checkpoint unavailable
|
0.736 | 32.0 | 0.905 | ✓ Certified | Tabian et al., Sensors 2019 |
| 5 |
AE-CNN
AE-CNN Ebrahimkhanlou & Salamone, Struct. Health Monit. 2019
30.0 dB
SSIM 0.870
Checkpoint unavailable
|
0.685 | 30.0 | 0.870 | ✓ Certified | Ebrahimkhanlou & Salamone, Struct. Health Monit. 2019 |
| 6 | PnP-ADMM | 0.608 | 27.5 | 0.800 | ✓ Certified | Venkatakrishnan et al., IEEE GlobalSIP 2013 |
| 7 | Sparse TR (L1) | 0.540 | 25.5 | 0.730 | ✓ Certified | Gao et al., J. Sound Vib. 2016 |
| 8 | TDOA-WLS | 0.432 | 22.0 | 0.630 | ✓ Certified | Kundu, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2014 |
| 9 | Time-Reversal Imaging | 0.382 | 20.5 | 0.580 | ✓ Certified | Fink, IEEE UFFC 1992; Grosse & Ohtsu 2008 |
Dataset: PWM Benchmark (9 algorithms)
Blind Reconstruction Challenge — forward model has unknown mismatch, must calibrate from data. Score = 0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖)
| # | Method | Overall Score | Public PSNR / SSIM |
Dev PSNR / SSIM |
Hidden PSNR / SSIM |
Trust | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🥇 | SwinIR-AE + gradient | 0.708 |
0.803
33.33 dB / 0.955
|
0.706
27.97 dB / 0.880
|
0.615
24.5 dB / 0.786
|
✓ Certified | Liang et al., ICCV 2021; AE-adapted 2024 |
| 🥈 |
DiffusionAE + gradient
DiffusionAE + gradient Song et al., ICLR 2021; SHM application 2024 Score 0.697
Correct & Reconstruct →
|
0.697 |
0.790
32.9 dB / 0.952
|
0.684
27.43 dB / 0.868
|
0.618
23.87 dB / 0.764
|
✓ Certified | Song et al., ICLR 2021; SHM application 2024 |
| 🥉 |
PINN-AE + gradient
PINN-AE + gradient Raissi et al., J. Comput. Phys. 2019; AE extension 2024 Score 0.644
Correct & Reconstruct →
|
0.644 |
0.760
30.72 dB / 0.927
|
0.650
25.39 dB / 0.814
|
0.522
21.15 dB / 0.652
|
✓ Certified | Raissi et al., J. Comput. Phys. 2019; AE extension 2024 |
| 4 | Domain-Adapted ResNet + gradient | 0.618 |
0.736
29.34 dB / 0.906
|
0.588
22.75 dB / 0.721
|
0.531
21.23 dB / 0.656
|
✓ Certified | Tabian et al., Sensors 2019 |
| 5 |
AE-CNN + gradient
AE-CNN + gradient Ebrahimkhanlou & Salamone, Struct. Health Monit. 2019 Score 0.580
Correct & Reconstruct →
|
0.580 |
0.698
27.16 dB / 0.862
|
0.553
21.31 dB / 0.660
|
0.489
19.72 dB / 0.585
|
✓ Certified | Ebrahimkhanlou & Salamone, Struct. Health Monit. 2019 |
| 6 | PnP-ADMM + gradient | 0.570 |
0.678
25.77 dB / 0.825
|
0.527
20.96 dB / 0.644
|
0.505
19.99 dB / 0.598
|
✓ Certified | Venkatakrishnan et al., IEEE GlobalSIP 2013 |
| 7 | Sparse TR (L1) + gradient | 0.495 |
0.597
22.72 dB / 0.720
|
0.491
19.49 dB / 0.574
|
0.398
16.4 dB / 0.421
|
✓ Certified | Gao et al., J. Sound Vib. 2016 |
| 8 | TDOA-WLS + gradient | 0.485 |
0.544
20.65 dB / 0.629
|
0.481
19.38 dB / 0.569
|
0.430
17.4 dB / 0.470
|
✓ Certified | Kundu, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2014 |
| 9 |
Time-Reversal Imaging + gradient
Time-Reversal Imaging + gradient Fink, IEEE UFFC 1992; applied to AE: Grosse & Ohtsu 2008 Score 0.435
Correct & Reconstruct →
|
0.435 |
0.494
18.88 dB / 0.544
|
0.417
17.24 dB / 0.462
|
0.393
16.42 dB / 0.422
|
✓ Certified | Fink, IEEE UFFC 1992; applied to AE: Grosse & Ohtsu 2008 |
Complete score requires all 3 tiers (Public + Dev + Hidden).
Join the competition →Full-access development tier with all data visible.
What you get & how to use
What you get: Measurements (y), ideal forward operator (H), spec ranges, ground truth (x_true), and true mismatch spec.
How to use: Load HDF5 → compare reconstruction vs x_true → check consistency → iterate.
What to submit: Reconstructed signals (x_hat) and corrected spec as HDF5.
Public Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SwinIR-AE + gradient | 0.803 | 33.33 | 0.955 |
| 2 | DiffusionAE + gradient | 0.790 | 32.9 | 0.952 |
| 3 | PINN-AE + gradient | 0.760 | 30.72 | 0.927 |
| 4 | Domain-Adapted ResNet + gradient | 0.736 | 29.34 | 0.906 |
| 5 | AE-CNN + gradient | 0.698 | 27.16 | 0.862 |
| 6 | PnP-ADMM + gradient | 0.678 | 25.77 | 0.825 |
| 7 | Sparse TR (L1) + gradient | 0.597 | 22.72 | 0.72 |
| 8 | TDOA-WLS + gradient | 0.544 | 20.65 | 0.629 |
| 9 | Time-Reversal Imaging + gradient | 0.494 | 18.88 | 0.544 |
Spec Ranges (4 parameters)
| Parameter | Min | Max | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| source_location_error | -1.0 | 2.0 | mm |
| wave_speed_error | 5860.0 | 5980.0 | m/s |
| sensor_coupling_gain | 0.96 | 1.08 | - |
| arrival_time_bias | -0.1 | 0.2 | us |
Blind evaluation tier — no ground truth available.
What you get & how to use
What you get: Measurements (y), ideal forward operator (H), and spec ranges only.
How to use: Apply your pipeline from the Public tier. Use consistency as self-check.
What to submit: Reconstructed signals and corrected spec. Scored server-side.
Dev Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SwinIR-AE + gradient | 0.706 | 27.97 | 0.88 |
| 2 | DiffusionAE + gradient | 0.684 | 27.43 | 0.868 |
| 3 | PINN-AE + gradient | 0.650 | 25.39 | 0.814 |
| 4 | Domain-Adapted ResNet + gradient | 0.588 | 22.75 | 0.721 |
| 5 | AE-CNN + gradient | 0.553 | 21.31 | 0.66 |
| 6 | PnP-ADMM + gradient | 0.527 | 20.96 | 0.644 |
| 7 | Sparse TR (L1) + gradient | 0.491 | 19.49 | 0.574 |
| 8 | TDOA-WLS + gradient | 0.481 | 19.38 | 0.569 |
| 9 | Time-Reversal Imaging + gradient | 0.417 | 17.24 | 0.462 |
Spec Ranges (4 parameters)
| Parameter | Min | Max | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| source_location_error | -1.2 | 1.8 | mm |
| wave_speed_error | 5852.0 | 5972.0 | m/s |
| sensor_coupling_gain | 0.952 | 1.072 | - |
| arrival_time_bias | -0.12 | 0.18 | us |
Fully blind server-side evaluation — no data download.
What you get & how to use
What you get: No data downloadable. Algorithm runs server-side on hidden measurements.
How to use: Package algorithm as Docker container / Python script. Submit via link.
What to submit: Containerized algorithm accepting y + H, outputting x_hat + corrected spec.
Hidden Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DiffusionAE + gradient | 0.618 | 23.87 | 0.764 |
| 2 | SwinIR-AE + gradient | 0.615 | 24.5 | 0.786 |
| 3 | Domain-Adapted ResNet + gradient | 0.531 | 21.23 | 0.656 |
| 4 | PINN-AE + gradient | 0.522 | 21.15 | 0.652 |
| 5 | PnP-ADMM + gradient | 0.505 | 19.99 | 0.598 |
| 6 | AE-CNN + gradient | 0.489 | 19.72 | 0.585 |
| 7 | TDOA-WLS + gradient | 0.430 | 17.4 | 0.47 |
| 8 | Sparse TR (L1) + gradient | 0.398 | 16.4 | 0.421 |
| 9 | Time-Reversal Imaging + gradient | 0.393 | 16.42 | 0.422 |
Spec Ranges (4 parameters)
| Parameter | Min | Max | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| source_location_error | -0.7 | 2.3 | mm |
| wave_speed_error | 5872.0 | 5992.0 | m/s |
| sensor_coupling_gain | 0.972 | 1.092 | - |
| arrival_time_bias | -0.07 | 0.23 | us |
Blind Reconstruction Challenge
ChallengeGiven measurements with unknown mismatch and spec ranges (not exact params), reconstruct the original signal. A method must be evaluated on all three tiers for a complete score. Scored on a composite metric: 0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖).
Measurements y, ideal forward model H, spec ranges
Reconstructed signal x̂
Spec DAG — Forward Model Pipeline
P → S → D
Mismatch Parameters
| Symbol | Parameter | Description | Nominal | Perturbed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| s_l | source_location_error | Source location error (mm) | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| w_s | wave_speed_error | Wave speed error (m/s) | 5900.0 | 5940.0 |
| s_c | sensor_coupling_gain | Sensor coupling gain (-) | 1.0 | 1.04 |
| a_t | arrival_time_bias | Arrival time bias (us) | 0.0 | 0.1 |
Credits System
Spec Primitives Reference (11 primitives)
Free-space or medium propagation kernel (Fresnel, Rayleigh-Sommerfeld).
Spatial or spatio-temporal amplitude modulation (coded aperture, SLM pattern).
Geometric projection operator (Radon transform, fan-beam, cone-beam).
Sampling in the Fourier / k-space domain (MRI, ptychography).
Shift-invariant convolution with a point-spread function (PSF).
Summation along a physical dimension (spectral, temporal, angular).
Sensor readout with gain g and noise model η (Gaussian, Poisson, mixed).
Patterned illumination (block, Hadamard, random) applied to the scene.
Spectral dispersion element (prism, grating) with shift α and aperture a.
Sample or gantry rotation (CT, electron tomography).
Spectral filter or monochromator selecting a wavelength band.