X-ray NDT (Radiography)
X-ray NDT (Radiography)
Standard reconstruction benchmark — forward model perfectly known, no calibration needed. Score = 0.5 × clip((PSNR−15)/30, 0, 1) + 0.5 × SSIM
| # | Method | Score | PSNR (dB) | SSIM | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🥇 |
FBPConvNet
FBPConvNet Jin et al., IEEE TIP 2017
35.81 dB
SSIM 0.939
Checkpoint unavailable
|
0.816 | 35.81 | 0.939 | ✓ Certified | Jin et al., IEEE TIP 2017 |
| 🥈 |
DR-GAN
DR-GAN Zhang et al., NDT&E Int. 2021
34.07 dB
SSIM 0.961
Checkpoint unavailable
|
0.798 | 34.07 | 0.961 | ✓ Certified | Zhang et al., NDT&E Int. 2021 |
| 🥉 | PnP-ADMM | 0.740 | 32.64 | 0.891 | ✓ Certified | Venkatakrishnan et al., 2013 |
| 4 | FBP | 0.601 | 27.38 | 0.790 | ✓ Certified | Kak & Slaney, 1988 |
Dataset: PWM Benchmark (4 algorithms)
Blind Reconstruction Challenge — forward model has unknown mismatch, must calibrate from data. Score = 0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖)
| # | Method | Overall Score | Public PSNR / SSIM |
Dev PSNR / SSIM |
Hidden PSNR / SSIM |
Trust | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🥇 | PnP-ADMM + gradient | 0.708 |
0.751
30.51 dB / 0.924
|
0.712
28.64 dB / 0.894
|
0.660
26.54 dB / 0.847
|
✓ Certified | Venkatakrishnan et al., 2013 |
| 🥈 | FBPConvNet + gradient | 0.704 |
0.797
34.03 dB / 0.961
|
0.684
26.74 dB / 0.852
|
0.632
25.24 dB / 0.810
|
✓ Certified | Jin et al., IEEE TIP 2017 |
| 🥉 | DR-GAN + gradient | 0.666 |
0.771
31.71 dB / 0.939
|
0.638
25.41 dB / 0.815
|
0.590
23.4 dB / 0.746
|
✓ Certified | Zhang et al., NDT&E Int. 2021 |
| 4 | FBP + gradient | 0.648 |
0.655
25.45 dB / 0.816
|
0.658
25.96 dB / 0.831
|
0.630
25.16 dB / 0.807
|
✓ Certified | Kak & Slaney, IEEE Press 1988 |
Complete score requires all 3 tiers (Public + Dev + Hidden).
Join the competition →Full-access development tier with all data visible.
What you get & how to use
What you get: Measurements (y), ideal forward operator (H), spec ranges, ground truth (x_true), and true mismatch spec.
How to use: Load HDF5 → compare reconstruction vs x_true → check consistency → iterate.
What to submit: Reconstructed signals (x_hat) and corrected spec as HDF5.
Public Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FBPConvNet + gradient | 0.797 | 34.03 | 0.961 |
| 2 | DR-GAN + gradient | 0.771 | 31.71 | 0.939 |
| 3 | PnP-ADMM + gradient | 0.751 | 30.51 | 0.924 |
| 4 | FBP + gradient | 0.655 | 25.45 | 0.816 |
Spec Ranges (4 parameters)
| Parameter | Min | Max | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| source_position_error | -0.2 | 0.4 | mm |
| beam_hardening | -0.02 | 0.04 | - |
| detector_gain_drift | 0.99 | 1.02 | - |
| geometric_magnification | 1.96 | 2.08 | - |
Blind evaluation tier — no ground truth available.
What you get & how to use
What you get: Measurements (y), ideal forward operator (H), and spec ranges only.
How to use: Apply your pipeline from the Public tier. Use consistency as self-check.
What to submit: Reconstructed signals and corrected spec. Scored server-side.
Dev Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PnP-ADMM + gradient | 0.712 | 28.64 | 0.894 |
| 2 | FBPConvNet + gradient | 0.684 | 26.74 | 0.852 |
| 3 | FBP + gradient | 0.658 | 25.96 | 0.831 |
| 4 | DR-GAN + gradient | 0.638 | 25.41 | 0.815 |
Spec Ranges (4 parameters)
| Parameter | Min | Max | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| source_position_error | -0.24 | 0.36 | mm |
| beam_hardening | -0.024 | 0.036 | - |
| detector_gain_drift | 0.988 | 1.018 | - |
| geometric_magnification | 1.952 | 2.072 | - |
Fully blind server-side evaluation — no data download.
What you get & how to use
What you get: No data downloadable. Algorithm runs server-side on hidden measurements.
How to use: Package algorithm as Docker container / Python script. Submit via link.
What to submit: Containerized algorithm accepting y + H, outputting x_hat + corrected spec.
Hidden Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PnP-ADMM + gradient | 0.660 | 26.54 | 0.847 |
| 2 | FBPConvNet + gradient | 0.632 | 25.24 | 0.81 |
| 3 | FBP + gradient | 0.630 | 25.16 | 0.807 |
| 4 | DR-GAN + gradient | 0.590 | 23.4 | 0.746 |
Spec Ranges (4 parameters)
| Parameter | Min | Max | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| source_position_error | -0.14 | 0.46 | mm |
| beam_hardening | -0.014 | 0.046 | - |
| detector_gain_drift | 0.993 | 1.023 | - |
| geometric_magnification | 1.972 | 2.092 | - |
Blind Reconstruction Challenge
ChallengeGiven measurements with unknown mismatch and spec ranges (not exact params), reconstruct the original signal. A method must be evaluated on all three tiers for a complete score. Scored on a composite metric: 0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖).
Measurements y, ideal forward model H, spec ranges
Reconstructed signal x̂
Spec DAG — Forward Model Pipeline
Π → D
Mismatch Parameters
| Symbol | Parameter | Description | Nominal | Perturbed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| s_p | source_position_error | Source position error (mm) | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| b_h | beam_hardening | Beam hardening (-) | 0.0 | 0.02 |
| d_g | detector_gain_drift | Detector gain drift (-) | 1.0 | 1.01 |
| g_m | geometric_magnification | Geometric magnification (-) | 2.0 | 2.04 |
Credits System
Spec Primitives Reference (11 primitives)
Free-space or medium propagation kernel (Fresnel, Rayleigh-Sommerfeld).
Spatial or spatio-temporal amplitude modulation (coded aperture, SLM pattern).
Geometric projection operator (Radon transform, fan-beam, cone-beam).
Sampling in the Fourier / k-space domain (MRI, ptychography).
Shift-invariant convolution with a point-spread function (PSF).
Summation along a physical dimension (spectral, temporal, angular).
Sensor readout with gain g and noise model η (Gaussian, Poisson, mixed).
Patterned illumination (block, Hadamard, random) applied to the scene.
Spectral dispersion element (prism, grating) with shift α and aperture a.
Sample or gantry rotation (CT, electron tomography).
Spectral filter or monochromator selecting a wavelength band.