Weather / Doppler Radar
Weather / Doppler Radar
Standard reconstruction benchmark — forward model perfectly known, no calibration needed. Score = 0.5 × clip((PSNR−15)/30, 0, 1) + 0.5 × SSIM
| # | Method | Score | PSNR (dB) | SSIM | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🥇 |
Earthformer
Earthformer Gao et al., NeurIPS 2022
33.5 dB
SSIM 0.935
Checkpoint unavailable
|
0.776 | 33.5 | 0.935 | ✓ Certified | Gao et al., NeurIPS 2022 |
| 🥈 |
RainNet
RainNet Ayzel et al., GMD 2020
31.8 dB
SSIM 0.900
Checkpoint unavailable
|
0.730 | 31.8 | 0.900 | ✓ Certified | Ayzel et al., GMD 2020 |
| 🥉 | CLEAN-AP | 0.603 | 27.5 | 0.790 | ✓ Certified | Torres & Zrnic, IEEE TGRS 1999 |
| 4 | Pulse-Pair Doppler | 0.485 | 24.0 | 0.670 | ✓ Certified | Zrnic, IEEE TAES 1977 |
Dataset: PWM Benchmark (4 algorithms)
Blind Reconstruction Challenge — forward model has unknown mismatch, must calibrate from data. Score = 0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖)
| # | Method | Overall Score | Public PSNR / SSIM |
Dev PSNR / SSIM |
Hidden PSNR / SSIM |
Trust | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🥇 | Earthformer + gradient | 0.708 |
0.764
31.37 dB / 0.935
|
0.698
28.4 dB / 0.889
|
0.661
26.67 dB / 0.850
|
✓ Certified | Gao et al., NeurIPS 2022 |
| 🥈 | RainNet + gradient | 0.618 |
0.761
30.49 dB / 0.924
|
0.601
23.33 dB / 0.744
|
0.493
19.22 dB / 0.561
|
✓ Certified | Ayzel et al., GMD 2020 |
| 🥉 | CLEAN-AP + gradient | 0.613 |
0.644
24.62 dB / 0.790
|
0.616
23.61 dB / 0.754
|
0.578
22.22 dB / 0.699
|
✓ Certified | Torres & Zrnic, IEEE TGRS 1999 |
| 4 | Pulse-Pair Doppler + gradient | 0.527 |
0.554
21.13 dB / 0.652
|
0.544
21.27 dB / 0.658
|
0.484
19.08 dB / 0.554
|
✓ Certified | Zrnic, IEEE TAES 1977 |
Complete score requires all 3 tiers (Public + Dev + Hidden).
Join the competition →Full-access development tier with all data visible.
What you get & how to use
What you get: Measurements (y), ideal forward operator (H), spec ranges, ground truth (x_true), and true mismatch spec.
How to use: Load HDF5 → compare reconstruction vs x_true → check consistency → iterate.
What to submit: Reconstructed signals (x_hat) and corrected spec as HDF5.
Public Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Earthformer + gradient | 0.764 | 31.37 | 0.935 |
| 2 | RainNet + gradient | 0.761 | 30.49 | 0.924 |
| 3 | CLEAN-AP + gradient | 0.644 | 24.62 | 0.79 |
| 4 | Pulse-Pair Doppler + gradient | 0.554 | 21.13 | 0.652 |
Spec Ranges (4 parameters)
| Parameter | Min | Max | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| calibration_bias | -0.2 | 0.4 | dBZ |
| beam_elevation_error | -0.04 | 0.08 | deg |
| attenuation_correction | 0.98 | 1.04 | - |
| ground_clutter_leakage | -0.01 | 0.02 | - |
Blind evaluation tier — no ground truth available.
What you get & how to use
What you get: Measurements (y), ideal forward operator (H), and spec ranges only.
How to use: Apply your pipeline from the Public tier. Use consistency as self-check.
What to submit: Reconstructed signals and corrected spec. Scored server-side.
Dev Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Earthformer + gradient | 0.698 | 28.4 | 0.889 |
| 2 | CLEAN-AP + gradient | 0.616 | 23.61 | 0.754 |
| 3 | RainNet + gradient | 0.601 | 23.33 | 0.744 |
| 4 | Pulse-Pair Doppler + gradient | 0.544 | 21.27 | 0.658 |
Spec Ranges (4 parameters)
| Parameter | Min | Max | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| calibration_bias | -0.24 | 0.36 | dBZ |
| beam_elevation_error | -0.048 | 0.072 | deg |
| attenuation_correction | 0.976 | 1.036 | - |
| ground_clutter_leakage | -0.012 | 0.018 | - |
Fully blind server-side evaluation — no data download.
What you get & how to use
What you get: No data downloadable. Algorithm runs server-side on hidden measurements.
How to use: Package algorithm as Docker container / Python script. Submit via link.
What to submit: Containerized algorithm accepting y + H, outputting x_hat + corrected spec.
Hidden Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Earthformer + gradient | 0.661 | 26.67 | 0.85 |
| 2 | CLEAN-AP + gradient | 0.578 | 22.22 | 0.699 |
| 3 | RainNet + gradient | 0.493 | 19.22 | 0.561 |
| 4 | Pulse-Pair Doppler + gradient | 0.484 | 19.08 | 0.554 |
Spec Ranges (4 parameters)
| Parameter | Min | Max | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| calibration_bias | -0.14 | 0.46 | dBZ |
| beam_elevation_error | -0.028 | 0.092 | deg |
| attenuation_correction | 0.986 | 1.046 | - |
| ground_clutter_leakage | -0.007 | 0.023 | - |
Blind Reconstruction Challenge
ChallengeGiven measurements with unknown mismatch and spec ranges (not exact params), reconstruct the original signal. A method must be evaluated on all three tiers for a complete score. Scored on a composite metric: 0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖).
Measurements y, ideal forward model H, spec ranges
Reconstructed signal x̂
Spec DAG — Forward Model Pipeline
P → R → D
Mismatch Parameters
| Symbol | Parameter | Description | Nominal | Perturbed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| c_b | calibration_bias | Calibration bias (dBZ) | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| b_e | beam_elevation_error | Beam elevation error (deg) | 0.0 | 0.04 |
| a_c | attenuation_correction | Attenuation correction (-) | 1.0 | 1.02 |
| g_c | ground_clutter_leakage | Ground clutter leakage (-) | 0.0 | 0.01 |
Credits System
Spec Primitives Reference (11 primitives)
Free-space or medium propagation kernel (Fresnel, Rayleigh-Sommerfeld).
Spatial or spatio-temporal amplitude modulation (coded aperture, SLM pattern).
Geometric projection operator (Radon transform, fan-beam, cone-beam).
Sampling in the Fourier / k-space domain (MRI, ptychography).
Shift-invariant convolution with a point-spread function (PSF).
Summation along a physical dimension (spectral, temporal, angular).
Sensor readout with gain g and noise model η (Gaussian, Poisson, mixed).
Patterned illumination (block, Hadamard, random) applied to the scene.
Spectral dispersion element (prism, grating) with shift α and aperture a.
Sample or gantry rotation (CT, electron tomography).
Spectral filter or monochromator selecting a wavelength band.