Talbot-Lau X-ray Grating Interferometry

Talbot-Lau X-ray Grating Interferometry

Standard reconstruction benchmark — forward model perfectly known, no calibration needed. Score = 0.5 × clip((PSNR−15)/30, 0, 1) + 0.5 × SSIM

# Method Score PSNR (dB) SSIM Source
🥇 GratingFormer 0.755 32.0 0.943 ✓ Certified Grating interferometry transformer, 2024
🥈 DPC-Net 0.686 29.09 0.902 ✓ Certified Differential phase contrast CNN, 2021
🥉 PCA Retrieval 0.543 24.26 0.778 ✓ Certified Zanette et al., PMB 2012
4 Phase Stepping 0.519 23.57 0.753 ✓ Certified Weitkamp et al., Opt. Express 2005

Dataset: PWM Benchmark (4 algorithms)

Blind Reconstruction Challenge — forward model has unknown mismatch, must calibrate from data. Score = 0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖)

# Method Overall Score Public
PSNR / SSIM
Dev
PSNR / SSIM
Hidden
PSNR / SSIM
Trust Source
🥇 GratingFormer + gradient 0.700
0.741
30.04 dB / 0.917
0.706
28.63 dB / 0.893
0.653
26.28 dB / 0.840
✓ Certified Grating interferometry transformer, 2024
🥈 DPC-Net + gradient 0.549
0.716
27.95 dB / 0.880
0.508
19.6 dB / 0.579
0.424
17.33 dB / 0.467
✓ Certified Differential phase contrast CNN, 2021
🥉 PCA Retrieval + gradient 0.535
0.560
21.34 dB / 0.661
0.544
20.98 dB / 0.645
0.501
20.33 dB / 0.614
✓ Certified Zanette et al., PMB 2012
4 Phase Stepping + gradient 0.524
0.557
21.54 dB / 0.670
0.513
19.98 dB / 0.598
0.503
20.05 dB / 0.601
✓ Certified Weitkamp et al., Opt. Express 2005

Complete score requires all 3 tiers (Public + Dev + Hidden).

Join the competition →
Scoring: 0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖) PSNR 40% · SSIM 40% · Consistency 20%
Public 5 scenes

Full-access development tier with all data visible.

What you get & how to use

What you get: Measurements (y), ideal forward operator (H), spec ranges, ground truth (x_true), and true mismatch spec.

How to use: Load HDF5 → compare reconstruction vs x_true → check consistency → iterate.

What to submit: Reconstructed signals (x_hat) and corrected spec as HDF5.

Public Leaderboard
# Method Score PSNR SSIM
1 GratingFormer + gradient 0.741 30.04 0.917
2 DPC-Net + gradient 0.716 27.95 0.88
3 PCA Retrieval + gradient 0.560 21.34 0.661
4 Phase Stepping + gradient 0.557 21.54 0.67
Spec Ranges (4 parameters)
Parameter Min Max Unit
grating_alignment_(rotation) -0.1 0.2 deg
inter_grating_distance_error -0.2 0.4 -
phase_stepping_error -1.0 2.0 perstep
grating_defect_fraction -0.6 1.2 -
Dev 5 scenes

Blind evaluation tier — no ground truth available.

What you get & how to use

What you get: Measurements (y), ideal forward operator (H), and spec ranges only.

How to use: Apply your pipeline from the Public tier. Use consistency as self-check.

What to submit: Reconstructed signals and corrected spec. Scored server-side.

Dev Leaderboard
# Method Score PSNR SSIM
1 GratingFormer + gradient 0.706 28.63 0.893
2 PCA Retrieval + gradient 0.544 20.98 0.645
3 Phase Stepping + gradient 0.513 19.98 0.598
4 DPC-Net + gradient 0.508 19.6 0.579
Spec Ranges (4 parameters)
Parameter Min Max Unit
grating_alignment_(rotation) -0.12 0.18 deg
inter_grating_distance_error -0.24 0.36 -
phase_stepping_error -1.2 1.8 perstep
grating_defect_fraction -0.72 1.08 -
Hidden 5 scenes

Fully blind server-side evaluation — no data download.

What you get & how to use

What you get: No data downloadable. Algorithm runs server-side on hidden measurements.

How to use: Package algorithm as Docker container / Python script. Submit via link.

What to submit: Containerized algorithm accepting y + H, outputting x_hat + corrected spec.

Hidden Leaderboard
# Method Score PSNR SSIM
1 GratingFormer + gradient 0.653 26.28 0.84
2 Phase Stepping + gradient 0.503 20.05 0.601
3 PCA Retrieval + gradient 0.501 20.33 0.614
4 DPC-Net + gradient 0.424 17.33 0.467
Spec Ranges (4 parameters)
Parameter Min Max Unit
grating_alignment_(rotation) -0.07 0.23 deg
inter_grating_distance_error -0.14 0.46 -
phase_stepping_error -0.7 2.3 perstep
grating_defect_fraction -0.42 1.38 -

Blind Reconstruction Challenge

Challenge

Given measurements with unknown mismatch and spec ranges (not exact params), reconstruct the original signal. A method must be evaluated on all three tiers for a complete score. Scored on a composite metric: 0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖).

Input

Measurements y, ideal forward model H, spec ranges

Output

Reconstructed signal x̂

Spec DAG — Forward Model Pipeline

M → P → D

M Modulation
P Propagation
D Detector

Mismatch Parameters

Symbol Parameter Description Nominal Perturbed
g_a grating_alignment_(rotation) Grating alignment (rotation) (deg) 0.0 0.1
i_d inter_grating_distance_error Inter-grating distance error (-) 0.0 0.2
p_s phase_stepping_error Phase stepping error (per step) 0.0 1.0
g_d grating_defect_fraction Grating defect fraction (-) 0.0 0.6

Credits System

40%
Platform Profit Pool
Revenue allocated to benchmark rewards
30%
Winner Share
Top algorithm receives from pool
$100
Min Withdrawal
Minimum payout threshold
Spec Primitives Reference (11 primitives)
P Propagation

Free-space or medium propagation kernel (Fresnel, Rayleigh-Sommerfeld).

M Mask / Modulation

Spatial or spatio-temporal amplitude modulation (coded aperture, SLM pattern).

Π Projection

Geometric projection operator (Radon transform, fan-beam, cone-beam).

F Fourier Sampling

Sampling in the Fourier / k-space domain (MRI, ptychography).

C Convolution

Shift-invariant convolution with a point-spread function (PSF).

Σ Summation / Integration

Summation along a physical dimension (spectral, temporal, angular).

D Detector

Sensor readout with gain g and noise model η (Gaussian, Poisson, mixed).

S Structured Illumination

Patterned illumination (block, Hadamard, random) applied to the scene.

W Wavelength Dispersion

Spectral dispersion element (prism, grating) with shift α and aperture a.

R Rotation / Motion

Sample or gantry rotation (CT, electron tomography).

Λ Wavelength Selection

Spectral filter or monochromator selecting a wavelength band.