Talbot-Lau X-ray Grating Interferometry
Talbot-Lau X-ray Grating Interferometry
Standard reconstruction benchmark — forward model perfectly known, no calibration needed. Score = 0.5 × clip((PSNR−15)/30, 0, 1) + 0.5 × SSIM
| # | Method | Score | PSNR (dB) | SSIM | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🥇 |
GratingFormer
GratingFormer Grating interferometry transformer, 2024
32.0 dB
SSIM 0.943
Checkpoint unavailable
|
0.755 | 32.0 | 0.943 | ✓ Certified | Grating interferometry transformer, 2024 |
| 🥈 |
DPC-Net
DPC-Net Differential phase contrast CNN, 2021
29.09 dB
SSIM 0.902
Checkpoint unavailable
|
0.686 | 29.09 | 0.902 | ✓ Certified | Differential phase contrast CNN, 2021 |
| 🥉 | PCA Retrieval | 0.543 | 24.26 | 0.778 | ✓ Certified | Zanette et al., PMB 2012 |
| 4 | Phase Stepping | 0.519 | 23.57 | 0.753 | ✓ Certified | Weitkamp et al., Opt. Express 2005 |
Dataset: PWM Benchmark (4 algorithms)
Blind Reconstruction Challenge — forward model has unknown mismatch, must calibrate from data. Score = 0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖)
| # | Method | Overall Score | Public PSNR / SSIM |
Dev PSNR / SSIM |
Hidden PSNR / SSIM |
Trust | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🥇 |
GratingFormer + gradient
GratingFormer + gradient Grating interferometry transformer, 2024 Score 0.700
Correct & Reconstruct →
|
0.700 |
0.741
30.04 dB / 0.917
|
0.706
28.63 dB / 0.893
|
0.653
26.28 dB / 0.840
|
✓ Certified | Grating interferometry transformer, 2024 |
| 🥈 | DPC-Net + gradient | 0.549 |
0.716
27.95 dB / 0.880
|
0.508
19.6 dB / 0.579
|
0.424
17.33 dB / 0.467
|
✓ Certified | Differential phase contrast CNN, 2021 |
| 🥉 | PCA Retrieval + gradient | 0.535 |
0.560
21.34 dB / 0.661
|
0.544
20.98 dB / 0.645
|
0.501
20.33 dB / 0.614
|
✓ Certified | Zanette et al., PMB 2012 |
| 4 | Phase Stepping + gradient | 0.524 |
0.557
21.54 dB / 0.670
|
0.513
19.98 dB / 0.598
|
0.503
20.05 dB / 0.601
|
✓ Certified | Weitkamp et al., Opt. Express 2005 |
Complete score requires all 3 tiers (Public + Dev + Hidden).
Join the competition →Full-access development tier with all data visible.
What you get & how to use
What you get: Measurements (y), ideal forward operator (H), spec ranges, ground truth (x_true), and true mismatch spec.
How to use: Load HDF5 → compare reconstruction vs x_true → check consistency → iterate.
What to submit: Reconstructed signals (x_hat) and corrected spec as HDF5.
Public Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GratingFormer + gradient | 0.741 | 30.04 | 0.917 |
| 2 | DPC-Net + gradient | 0.716 | 27.95 | 0.88 |
| 3 | PCA Retrieval + gradient | 0.560 | 21.34 | 0.661 |
| 4 | Phase Stepping + gradient | 0.557 | 21.54 | 0.67 |
Spec Ranges (4 parameters)
| Parameter | Min | Max | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| grating_alignment_(rotation) | -0.1 | 0.2 | deg |
| inter_grating_distance_error | -0.2 | 0.4 | - |
| phase_stepping_error | -1.0 | 2.0 | perstep |
| grating_defect_fraction | -0.6 | 1.2 | - |
Blind evaluation tier — no ground truth available.
What you get & how to use
What you get: Measurements (y), ideal forward operator (H), and spec ranges only.
How to use: Apply your pipeline from the Public tier. Use consistency as self-check.
What to submit: Reconstructed signals and corrected spec. Scored server-side.
Dev Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GratingFormer + gradient | 0.706 | 28.63 | 0.893 |
| 2 | PCA Retrieval + gradient | 0.544 | 20.98 | 0.645 |
| 3 | Phase Stepping + gradient | 0.513 | 19.98 | 0.598 |
| 4 | DPC-Net + gradient | 0.508 | 19.6 | 0.579 |
Spec Ranges (4 parameters)
| Parameter | Min | Max | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| grating_alignment_(rotation) | -0.12 | 0.18 | deg |
| inter_grating_distance_error | -0.24 | 0.36 | - |
| phase_stepping_error | -1.2 | 1.8 | perstep |
| grating_defect_fraction | -0.72 | 1.08 | - |
Fully blind server-side evaluation — no data download.
What you get & how to use
What you get: No data downloadable. Algorithm runs server-side on hidden measurements.
How to use: Package algorithm as Docker container / Python script. Submit via link.
What to submit: Containerized algorithm accepting y + H, outputting x_hat + corrected spec.
Hidden Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GratingFormer + gradient | 0.653 | 26.28 | 0.84 |
| 2 | Phase Stepping + gradient | 0.503 | 20.05 | 0.601 |
| 3 | PCA Retrieval + gradient | 0.501 | 20.33 | 0.614 |
| 4 | DPC-Net + gradient | 0.424 | 17.33 | 0.467 |
Spec Ranges (4 parameters)
| Parameter | Min | Max | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| grating_alignment_(rotation) | -0.07 | 0.23 | deg |
| inter_grating_distance_error | -0.14 | 0.46 | - |
| phase_stepping_error | -0.7 | 2.3 | perstep |
| grating_defect_fraction | -0.42 | 1.38 | - |
Blind Reconstruction Challenge
ChallengeGiven measurements with unknown mismatch and spec ranges (not exact params), reconstruct the original signal. A method must be evaluated on all three tiers for a complete score. Scored on a composite metric: 0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖).
Measurements y, ideal forward model H, spec ranges
Reconstructed signal x̂
Spec DAG — Forward Model Pipeline
M → P → D
Mismatch Parameters
| Symbol | Parameter | Description | Nominal | Perturbed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| g_a | grating_alignment_(rotation) | Grating alignment (rotation) (deg) | 0.0 | 0.1 |
| i_d | inter_grating_distance_error | Inter-grating distance error (-) | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| p_s | phase_stepping_error | Phase stepping error (per step) | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| g_d | grating_defect_fraction | Grating defect fraction (-) | 0.0 | 0.6 |
Credits System
Spec Primitives Reference (11 primitives)
Free-space or medium propagation kernel (Fresnel, Rayleigh-Sommerfeld).
Spatial or spatio-temporal amplitude modulation (coded aperture, SLM pattern).
Geometric projection operator (Radon transform, fan-beam, cone-beam).
Sampling in the Fourier / k-space domain (MRI, ptychography).
Shift-invariant convolution with a point-spread function (PSF).
Summation along a physical dimension (spectral, temporal, angular).
Sensor readout with gain g and noise model η (Gaussian, Poisson, mixed).
Patterned illumination (block, Hadamard, random) applied to the scene.
Spectral dispersion element (prism, grating) with shift α and aperture a.
Sample or gantry rotation (CT, electron tomography).
Spectral filter or monochromator selecting a wavelength band.