Shearography
Shearography
Standard reconstruction benchmark — forward model perfectly known, no calibration needed. Score = 0.5 × clip((PSNR−15)/30, 0, 1) + 0.5 × SSIM
| # | Method | Score | PSNR (dB) | SSIM | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🥇 |
PhaseFormer
PhaseFormer Phase unwrapping transformer, 2024
34.0 dB
SSIM 0.935
Checkpoint unavailable
|
0.784 | 34.0 | 0.935 | ✓ Certified | Phase unwrapping transformer, 2024 |
| 🥈 |
ShearNet
ShearNet Shearography DL, 2022
32.0 dB
SSIM 0.900
Checkpoint unavailable
|
0.733 | 32.0 | 0.900 | ✓ Certified | Shearography DL, 2022 |
| 🥉 | PnP-Phase | 0.617 | 28.0 | 0.800 | ✓ Certified | PnP phase unwrapping |
| 4 | Goldstein MCF | 0.485 | 24.0 | 0.670 | ✓ Certified | Goldstein et al., 1988 |
Dataset: PWM Benchmark (4 algorithms)
Blind Reconstruction Challenge — forward model has unknown mismatch, must calibrate from data. Score = 0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖)
| # | Method | Overall Score | Public PSNR / SSIM |
Dev PSNR / SSIM |
Hidden PSNR / SSIM |
Trust | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🥇 | PhaseFormer + gradient | 0.687 |
0.766
31.11 dB / 0.932
|
0.688
27.67 dB / 0.874
|
0.608
24.2 dB / 0.776
|
✓ Certified | Phase unwrapping transformer, 2024 |
| 🥈 | ShearNet + gradient | 0.665 |
0.764
30.69 dB / 0.927
|
0.631
25.0 dB / 0.802
|
0.601
23.82 dB / 0.762
|
✓ Certified | Shearography DL reconstruction, 2022 |
| 🥉 | PnP-Phase + gradient | 0.583 |
0.665
25.83 dB / 0.827
|
0.563
21.73 dB / 0.678
|
0.522
20.91 dB / 0.642
|
✓ Certified | PnP with phase unwrapping prior |
| 4 | Goldstein MCF + gradient | 0.538 |
0.573
22.09 dB / 0.694
|
0.548
20.99 dB / 0.645
|
0.494
19.47 dB / 0.573
|
✓ Certified | Goldstein et al., Radio Sci. 1988 |
Complete score requires all 3 tiers (Public + Dev + Hidden).
Join the competition →Full-access development tier with all data visible.
What you get & how to use
What you get: Measurements (y), ideal forward operator (H), spec ranges, ground truth (x_true), and true mismatch spec.
How to use: Load HDF5 → compare reconstruction vs x_true → check consistency → iterate.
What to submit: Reconstructed signals (x_hat) and corrected spec as HDF5.
Public Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PhaseFormer + gradient | 0.766 | 31.11 | 0.932 |
| 2 | ShearNet + gradient | 0.764 | 30.69 | 0.927 |
| 3 | PnP-Phase + gradient | 0.665 | 25.83 | 0.827 |
| 4 | Goldstein MCF + gradient | 0.573 | 22.09 | 0.694 |
Spec Ranges (3 parameters)
| Parameter | Min | Max | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| shearing_amount_error | -2.0 | 4.0 | - |
| speckle_decorrelation | -0.06 | 0.12 | - |
| loading_non_uniformity | -4.0 | 8.0 | - |
Blind evaluation tier — no ground truth available.
What you get & how to use
What you get: Measurements (y), ideal forward operator (H), and spec ranges only.
How to use: Apply your pipeline from the Public tier. Use consistency as self-check.
What to submit: Reconstructed signals and corrected spec. Scored server-side.
Dev Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PhaseFormer + gradient | 0.688 | 27.67 | 0.874 |
| 2 | ShearNet + gradient | 0.631 | 25.0 | 0.802 |
| 3 | PnP-Phase + gradient | 0.563 | 21.73 | 0.678 |
| 4 | Goldstein MCF + gradient | 0.548 | 20.99 | 0.645 |
Spec Ranges (3 parameters)
| Parameter | Min | Max | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| shearing_amount_error | -2.4 | 3.6 | - |
| speckle_decorrelation | -0.072 | 0.108 | - |
| loading_non_uniformity | -4.8 | 7.2 | - |
Fully blind server-side evaluation — no data download.
What you get & how to use
What you get: No data downloadable. Algorithm runs server-side on hidden measurements.
How to use: Package algorithm as Docker container / Python script. Submit via link.
What to submit: Containerized algorithm accepting y + H, outputting x_hat + corrected spec.
Hidden Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PhaseFormer + gradient | 0.608 | 24.2 | 0.776 |
| 2 | ShearNet + gradient | 0.601 | 23.82 | 0.762 |
| 3 | PnP-Phase + gradient | 0.522 | 20.91 | 0.642 |
| 4 | Goldstein MCF + gradient | 0.494 | 19.47 | 0.573 |
Spec Ranges (3 parameters)
| Parameter | Min | Max | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| shearing_amount_error | -1.4 | 4.6 | - |
| speckle_decorrelation | -0.042 | 0.138 | - |
| loading_non_uniformity | -2.8 | 9.2 | - |
Blind Reconstruction Challenge
ChallengeGiven measurements with unknown mismatch and spec ranges (not exact params), reconstruct the original signal. A method must be evaluated on all three tiers for a complete score. Scored on a composite metric: 0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖).
Measurements y, ideal forward model H, spec ranges
Reconstructed signal x̂
Spec DAG — Forward Model Pipeline
M → P → D
Mismatch Parameters
| Symbol | Parameter | Description | Nominal | Perturbed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| s_a | shearing_amount_error | Shearing amount error (-) | 0.0 | 2.0 |
| s_d | speckle_decorrelation | Speckle decorrelation (-) | 0.0 | 0.06 |
| l_n | loading_non_uniformity | Loading non-uniformity (-) | 0.0 | 4.0 |
Credits System
Spec Primitives Reference (11 primitives)
Free-space or medium propagation kernel (Fresnel, Rayleigh-Sommerfeld).
Spatial or spatio-temporal amplitude modulation (coded aperture, SLM pattern).
Geometric projection operator (Radon transform, fan-beam, cone-beam).
Sampling in the Fourier / k-space domain (MRI, ptychography).
Shift-invariant convolution with a point-spread function (PSF).
Summation along a physical dimension (spectral, temporal, angular).
Sensor readout with gain g and noise model η (Gaussian, Poisson, mixed).
Patterned illumination (block, Hadamard, random) applied to the scene.
Spectral dispersion element (prism, grating) with shift α and aperture a.
Sample or gantry rotation (CT, electron tomography).
Spectral filter or monochromator selecting a wavelength band.