Public
Raman Imaging / Microscopy — Public Tier
(5 scenes)Full-access development tier with all data visible.
What you get
Measurements (y), ideal forward operator (H), spec ranges, ground truth (x_true), and true mismatch spec.
How to use
Load HDF5 → compare reconstruction vs x_true → check consistency → iterate.
What to submit
Reconstructed signals (x_hat) and corrected spec as HDF5.
Parameter Specifications
✓
True spec visible — use these exact values for Scenario III oracle reconstruction.
| Parameter | Spec Range | True Value | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| spectral_calibration_shift | -0.4 – 0.8 | 0.2 | cm^-1 |
| fluorescence_background | -2.0 – 4.0 | 1.0 | relative |
| laser_power_fluctuation | -1.0 – 2.0 | 0.5 | - |
| cosmic_ray_artifact | -0.2 – 0.4 | 0.1 | - |
InverseNet Baseline Scores
Method: CPU_baseline — Mismatch parameter: nominal
Scenario I (Ideal)
12.37 dB
SSIM 0.2289
Scenario II (Mismatch)
11.10 dB
SSIM 0.0825
Scenario III (Oracle)
12.54 dB
SSIM 0.0863
Per-scene breakdown (4 scenes)
| Scene | PSNR I | SSIM I | PSNR II | SSIM II | PSNR III | SSIM III |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| scene_00 | 11.90 | 0.1867 | 10.36 | 0.0587 | 10.94 | 0.0808 |
| scene_01 | 13.20 | 0.1668 | 12.09 | 0.0565 | 12.66 | 0.0783 |
| scene_02 | 11.29 | 0.2707 | 9.97 | 0.1188 | 12.91 | 0.0879 |
| scene_03 | 13.08 | 0.2912 | 11.97 | 0.0959 | 13.66 | 0.0985 |
Public Tier Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM | Consistency | Trust | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | U-Net-Spectra + gradient | 0.758 | 30.24 | 0.92 | 0.94 | ✓ Certified | Spectral U-Net variant |
| 2 | PINN-Spectra + gradient | 0.758 | 30.57 | 0.925 | 0.91 | ✓ Certified | Physics-informed neural network |
| 3 | Cascade-UNet + gradient | 0.756 | 30.87 | 0.929 | 0.88 | ✓ Certified | Physics-informed UNet, 2025 |
| 4 | DiffusionSpectra + gradient | 0.747 | 29.52 | 0.909 | 0.94 | ✓ Certified | Zhang et al., 2024 |
| 5 | CDAE + gradient | 0.730 | 29.19 | 0.904 | 0.88 | ✓ Certified | Zhang et al., Sensors 2024 |
| 6 | ScoreSpectra + gradient | 0.720 | 28.64 | 0.894 | 0.88 | ✓ Certified | Wei et al., 2025 |
| 7 | SpectraFormer + gradient | 0.710 | 27.75 | 0.875 | 0.91 | ✓ Certified | Spectroscopy transformer, 2024 |
| 8 | PnP-DnCNN + gradient | 0.659 | 25.44 | 0.816 | 0.89 | ✓ Certified | Zhang et al., 2017 |
| 9 | SVD + gradient | 0.633 | 24.58 | 0.789 | 0.86 | ✓ Certified | Singular Value Decomposition |
| 10 | Baseline Correction + gradient | 0.580 | 22.44 | 0.708 | 0.86 | ✓ Certified | Polynomial fitting baseline |
| 11 | SG-ALS + gradient | 0.565 | 21.61 | 0.673 | 0.9 | ✓ Certified | Savitzky-Golay + ALS baseline |
Visible Data Fields
y
H_ideal
spec_ranges
x_true
true_spec
Dataset
Format: HDF5
Scenes: 5
Scoring Formula
0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖)
PSNR: 40%
SSIM: 40%
Consistency: 20%