Radio Interferometry (VLBI)
Radio Interferometry (VLBI)
Standard reconstruction benchmark — forward model perfectly known, no calibration needed. Score = 0.5 × clip((PSNR−15)/30, 0, 1) + 0.5 × SSIM
| # | Method | Score | PSNR (dB) | SSIM | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🥇 |
PRIMO
PRIMO Medeiros et al., ApJL 2023
31.2 dB
SSIM 0.905
Checkpoint unavailable
|
0.722 | 31.2 | 0.905 | ✓ Certified | Medeiros et al., ApJL 2023 |
| 🥈 |
R2D2
R2D2 Aghabiglou et al., ApJS 2024
29.8 dB
SSIM 0.875
Checkpoint unavailable
|
0.684 | 29.8 | 0.875 | ✓ Certified | Aghabiglou et al., ApJS 2024 |
| 🥉 | AIRI | 0.573 | 26.3 | 0.770 | ✓ Certified | Terris et al., MNRAS 2022 |
| 4 | CLEAN | 0.425 | 22.5 | 0.600 | ✓ Certified | Hogbom, A&AS 1974 |
Dataset: PWM Benchmark (4 algorithms)
Blind Reconstruction Challenge — forward model has unknown mismatch, must calibrate from data. Score = 0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖)
| # | Method | Overall Score | Public PSNR / SSIM |
Dev PSNR / SSIM |
Hidden PSNR / SSIM |
Trust | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🥇 | R2D2 + gradient | 0.603 |
0.702
27.79 dB / 0.876
|
0.580
22.21 dB / 0.699
|
0.528
20.51 dB / 0.623
|
✓ Certified | Aghabiglou et al., ApJS 2024 |
| 🥈 | PRIMO + gradient | 0.569 |
0.752
30.1 dB / 0.918
|
0.519
20.68 dB / 0.631
|
0.436
17.45 dB / 0.473
|
✓ Certified | Medeiros et al., ApJL 2023 |
| 🥉 | AIRI + gradient | 0.560 |
0.632
24.52 dB / 0.787
|
0.564
21.99 dB / 0.690
|
0.483
19.42 dB / 0.571
|
✓ Certified | Terris et al., MNRAS 2022 |
| 4 | CLEAN + gradient | 0.477 |
0.510
19.61 dB / 0.580
|
0.502
19.95 dB / 0.596
|
0.420
17.12 dB / 0.456
|
✓ Certified | Hogbom, A&AS 1974 |
Complete score requires all 3 tiers (Public + Dev + Hidden).
Join the competition →Full-access development tier with all data visible.
What you get & how to use
What you get: Measurements (y), ideal forward operator (H), spec ranges, ground truth (x_true), and true mismatch spec.
How to use: Load HDF5 → compare reconstruction vs x_true → check consistency → iterate.
What to submit: Reconstructed signals (x_hat) and corrected spec as HDF5.
Public Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PRIMO + gradient | 0.752 | 30.1 | 0.918 |
| 2 | R2D2 + gradient | 0.702 | 27.79 | 0.876 |
| 3 | AIRI + gradient | 0.632 | 24.52 | 0.787 |
| 4 | CLEAN + gradient | 0.510 | 19.61 | 0.58 |
Spec Ranges (4 parameters)
| Parameter | Min | Max | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| baseline_error | -0.002 | 0.004 | m |
| phase_calibration | -2.0 | 4.0 | deg |
| amplitude_calibration | 0.98 | 1.04 | - |
| clock_offset | -0.2 | 0.4 | ns |
Blind evaluation tier — no ground truth available.
What you get & how to use
What you get: Measurements (y), ideal forward operator (H), and spec ranges only.
How to use: Apply your pipeline from the Public tier. Use consistency as self-check.
What to submit: Reconstructed signals and corrected spec. Scored server-side.
Dev Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | R2D2 + gradient | 0.580 | 22.21 | 0.699 |
| 2 | AIRI + gradient | 0.564 | 21.99 | 0.69 |
| 3 | PRIMO + gradient | 0.519 | 20.68 | 0.631 |
| 4 | CLEAN + gradient | 0.502 | 19.95 | 0.596 |
Spec Ranges (4 parameters)
| Parameter | Min | Max | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| baseline_error | -0.0024 | 0.0036 | m |
| phase_calibration | -2.4 | 3.6 | deg |
| amplitude_calibration | 0.976 | 1.036 | - |
| clock_offset | -0.24 | 0.36 | ns |
Fully blind server-side evaluation — no data download.
What you get & how to use
What you get: No data downloadable. Algorithm runs server-side on hidden measurements.
How to use: Package algorithm as Docker container / Python script. Submit via link.
What to submit: Containerized algorithm accepting y + H, outputting x_hat + corrected spec.
Hidden Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | R2D2 + gradient | 0.528 | 20.51 | 0.623 |
| 2 | AIRI + gradient | 0.483 | 19.42 | 0.571 |
| 3 | PRIMO + gradient | 0.436 | 17.45 | 0.473 |
| 4 | CLEAN + gradient | 0.420 | 17.12 | 0.456 |
Spec Ranges (4 parameters)
| Parameter | Min | Max | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| baseline_error | -0.0014 | 0.0046 | m |
| phase_calibration | -1.4 | 4.6 | deg |
| amplitude_calibration | 0.986 | 1.046 | - |
| clock_offset | -0.14 | 0.46 | ns |
Blind Reconstruction Challenge
ChallengeGiven measurements with unknown mismatch and spec ranges (not exact params), reconstruct the original signal. A method must be evaluated on all three tiers for a complete score. Scored on a composite metric: 0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖).
Measurements y, ideal forward model H, spec ranges
Reconstructed signal x̂
Spec DAG — Forward Model Pipeline
F → S → D
Mismatch Parameters
| Symbol | Parameter | Description | Nominal | Perturbed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| b_e | baseline_error | Baseline error (m) | 0.0 | 0.002 |
| p_c | phase_calibration | Phase calibration (deg) | 0.0 | 2.0 |
| a_c | amplitude_calibration | Amplitude calibration (-) | 1.0 | 1.02 |
| c_o | clock_offset | Clock offset (ns) | 0.0 | 0.2 |
Credits System
Spec Primitives Reference (11 primitives)
Free-space or medium propagation kernel (Fresnel, Rayleigh-Sommerfeld).
Spatial or spatio-temporal amplitude modulation (coded aperture, SLM pattern).
Geometric projection operator (Radon transform, fan-beam, cone-beam).
Sampling in the Fourier / k-space domain (MRI, ptychography).
Shift-invariant convolution with a point-spread function (PSF).
Summation along a physical dimension (spectral, temporal, angular).
Sensor readout with gain g and noise model η (Gaussian, Poisson, mixed).
Patterned illumination (block, Hadamard, random) applied to the scene.
Spectral dispersion element (prism, grating) with shift α and aperture a.
Sample or gantry rotation (CT, electron tomography).
Spectral filter or monochromator selecting a wavelength band.