Public

Quantum Illumination — Public Tier

(3 scenes)

Full-access development tier with all data visible.

What you get

Measurements (y), ideal forward operator (H), spec ranges, ground truth (x_true), and true mismatch spec.

How to use

Load HDF5 → compare reconstruction vs x_true → check consistency → iterate.

What to submit

Reconstructed signals (x_hat) and corrected spec as HDF5.

Parameter Specifications

True spec visible — use these exact values for Scenario III oracle reconstruction.

Parameter Spec Range True Value Unit
entanglement_quality_(concurrence) 0.8 – 1.1 0.95 -
background_thermal_noise -20.0 – 40.0 10.0 -
detector_dark_count_rate -200.0 – 400.0 100.0 Hz
channel_loss -6.0 – 12.0 3.0 dB

InverseNet Baseline Scores

Method: CPU_baseline — Mismatch parameter: nominal

Scenario I (Ideal)

6.97 dB

SSIM 0.2037

Scenario II (Mismatch)

6.97 dB

SSIM 0.1457

Scenario III (Oracle)

10.09 dB

SSIM 0.2808

Per-scene breakdown (4 scenes)
Scene PSNR I SSIM I PSNR II SSIM II PSNR III SSIM III
scene_00 6.67 0.1907 6.63 0.1348 9.76 0.2662
scene_01 6.94 0.2009 6.94 0.1453 10.04 0.2786
scene_02 7.55 0.2318 7.63 0.1622 10.73 0.3080
scene_03 6.69 0.1916 6.70 0.1404 9.84 0.2704

Public Tier Leaderboard

# Method Score PSNR SSIM Consistency Trust Source
1 QuantumFormer + gradient 0.674 26.25 0.839 0.88 ✓ Certified Quantum detection transformer, 2024
2 QI-Net + gradient 0.623 23.83 0.762 0.9 ✓ Certified Quantum illumination DL, 2023
3 FF-SFG + gradient 0.494 19.01 0.55 0.92 ✓ Certified Zhuang et al., PRL 2017
4 OPA Receiver + gradient 0.428 16.74 0.437 0.93 ✓ Certified Guha & Erkmen, PRA 2009

Visible Data Fields

y H_ideal spec_ranges x_true true_spec

Dataset

Format: HDF5
Scenes: 3

Scoring Formula

0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖)

PSNR: 40% SSIM: 40% Consistency: 20%
Back to Quantum Illumination