Polarimetric SAR (PolSAR)
Polarimetric SAR (PolSAR)
Standard reconstruction benchmark — forward model perfectly known, no calibration needed. Score = 0.5 × clip((PSNR−15)/30, 0, 1) + 0.5 × SSIM
| # | Method | Score | PSNR (dB) | SSIM | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🥇 |
DiffusionSAR
DiffusionSAR Wei et al., NeurIPS 2024
35.42 dB
SSIM 0.955
Checkpoint unavailable
|
0.818 | 35.42 | 0.955 | ✓ Certified | Wei et al., NeurIPS 2024 |
| 🥈 |
PanSharpener++
PanSharpener++ Zhang et al., ICCV 2024
34.58 dB
SSIM 0.945
Checkpoint unavailable
|
0.799 | 34.58 | 0.945 | ✓ Certified | Zhang et al., ICCV 2024 |
| 🥉 |
SARFormer
SARFormer Li et al., CVPR 2024
33.85 dB
SSIM 0.932
Checkpoint unavailable
|
0.780 | 33.85 | 0.932 | ✓ Certified | Li et al., CVPR 2024 |
| 4 |
ScoreSAR
ScoreSAR Johnson et al., ECCV 2025
32.44 dB
SSIM 0.947
Checkpoint unavailable
|
0.764 | 32.44 | 0.947 | ✓ Certified | Johnson et al., ECCV 2025 |
| 5 |
SARDenoiserViT
SARDenoiserViT Wang et al., ICCV 2024
32.31 dB
SSIM 0.946
Checkpoint unavailable
|
0.762 | 32.31 | 0.946 | ✓ Certified | Wang et al., ICCV 2024 |
| 6 |
SAR-CAM
SAR-CAM Cross-attention SAR, 2024
32.1 dB
SSIM 0.912
Checkpoint unavailable
|
0.741 | 32.1 | 0.912 | ✓ Certified | Cross-attention SAR, 2024 |
| 7 |
SAR-ResNet
SAR-ResNet Chen et al., IEEE TGRS 2022
30.88 dB
SSIM 0.929
Checkpoint unavailable
|
0.729 | 30.88 | 0.929 | ✓ Certified | Chen et al., IEEE TGRS 2022 |
| 8 |
SAR-DRN
SAR-DRN Zhang et al., RS 2018
30.6 dB
SSIM 0.882
Checkpoint unavailable
|
0.701 | 30.6 | 0.882 | ✓ Certified | Zhang et al., RS 2018 |
| 9 | SAR-BM3D | 0.598 | 27.2 | 0.790 | ✓ Certified | Parrilli et al., IEEE TGRS 2012 |
| 10 | Range-Doppler | 0.595 | 25.87 | 0.828 | ✓ Certified | SAR signal processing baseline |
| 11 | Lee Filter | 0.588 | 25.62 | 0.821 | ✓ Certified | Lee, IEEE TGRS 1980 |
| 12 | Chirp Scaling | 0.562 | 24.82 | 0.796 | ✓ Certified | Raney et al., IEEE TGRS 1994 |
| 13 | Matched Filter | 0.462 | 23.5 | 0.640 | ✓ Certified | Standard SAR focusing |
Dataset: PWM Benchmark (13 algorithms)
Blind Reconstruction Challenge — forward model has unknown mismatch, must calibrate from data. Score = 0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖)
| # | Method | Overall Score | Public PSNR / SSIM |
Dev PSNR / SSIM |
Hidden PSNR / SSIM |
Trust | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🥇 | SARFormer + gradient | 0.746 |
0.792
32.59 dB / 0.949
|
0.742
29.8 dB / 0.914
|
0.703
27.83 dB / 0.877
|
✓ Certified | Li et al., CVPR 2024 |
| 🥈 | DiffusionSAR + gradient | 0.706 |
0.788
32.8 dB / 0.951
|
0.693
27.07 dB / 0.860
|
0.638
25.79 dB / 0.826
|
✓ Certified | Wei et al., NeurIPS 2024 |
| 🥉 | PanSharpener++ + gradient | 0.702 |
0.776
31.9 dB / 0.942
|
0.677
26.59 dB / 0.848
|
0.653
25.47 dB / 0.817
|
✓ Certified | Zhang et al., ICCV 2024 |
| 4 | SARDenoiserViT + gradient | 0.684 |
0.744
29.94 dB / 0.916
|
0.688
27.53 dB / 0.871
|
0.620
24.62 dB / 0.790
|
✓ Certified | Wang et al., ICCV 2024 |
| 5 | ScoreSAR + gradient | 0.682 |
0.773
31.43 dB / 0.936
|
0.643
24.9 dB / 0.799
|
0.630
24.67 dB / 0.792
|
✓ Certified | Johnson et al., ECCV 2025 |
| 6 | SAR-CAM + gradient | 0.657 |
0.736
29.36 dB / 0.907
|
0.656
25.39 dB / 0.814
|
0.578
23.08 dB / 0.734
|
✓ Certified | Cross-attention SAR, 2024 |
| 7 | SAR-DRN + gradient | 0.635 |
0.715
28.37 dB / 0.888
|
0.623
24.73 dB / 0.793
|
0.566
22.82 dB / 0.724
|
✓ Certified | Zhang et al., RS 2018 |
| 8 | Range-Doppler + gradient | 0.605 |
0.621
23.97 dB / 0.767
|
0.606
23.96 dB / 0.767
|
0.588
23.46 dB / 0.749
|
✓ Certified | SAR signal processing baseline |
| 9 | SAR-BM3D + gradient | 0.591 |
0.638
24.36 dB / 0.781
|
0.605
23.49 dB / 0.750
|
0.531
21.3 dB / 0.659
|
✓ Certified | Parrilli et al., IEEE TGRS 2012 |
| 10 | Chirp Scaling + gradient | 0.577 |
0.582
22.21 dB / 0.699
|
0.593
23.17 dB / 0.738
|
0.557
21.51 dB / 0.669
|
✓ Certified | Raney et al., IEEE TGRS 1994 |
| 11 | Lee Filter + gradient | 0.570 |
0.636
24.04 dB / 0.770
|
0.560
22.21 dB / 0.699
|
0.515
20.89 dB / 0.641
|
✓ Certified | Lee, IEEE TGRS 1980 |
| 12 | SAR-ResNet + gradient | 0.569 |
0.746
29.69 dB / 0.912
|
0.541
21.38 dB / 0.663
|
0.420
17.68 dB / 0.484
|
✓ Certified | Chen et al., IEEE TGRS 2022 |
| 13 | Matched Filter + gradient | 0.510 |
0.580
21.86 dB / 0.684
|
0.493
19.72 dB / 0.585
|
0.458
18.67 dB / 0.533
|
✓ Certified | Standard SAR focusing |
Complete score requires all 3 tiers (Public + Dev + Hidden).
Join the competition →Full-access development tier with all data visible.
What you get & how to use
What you get: Measurements (y), ideal forward operator (H), spec ranges, ground truth (x_true), and true mismatch spec.
How to use: Load HDF5 → compare reconstruction vs x_true → check consistency → iterate.
What to submit: Reconstructed signals (x_hat) and corrected spec as HDF5.
Public Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SARFormer + gradient | 0.792 | 32.59 | 0.949 |
| 2 | DiffusionSAR + gradient | 0.788 | 32.8 | 0.951 |
| 3 | PanSharpener++ + gradient | 0.776 | 31.9 | 0.942 |
| 4 | ScoreSAR + gradient | 0.773 | 31.43 | 0.936 |
| 5 | SAR-ResNet + gradient | 0.746 | 29.69 | 0.912 |
| 6 | SARDenoiserViT + gradient | 0.744 | 29.94 | 0.916 |
| 7 | SAR-CAM + gradient | 0.736 | 29.36 | 0.907 |
| 8 | SAR-DRN + gradient | 0.715 | 28.37 | 0.888 |
| 9 | SAR-BM3D + gradient | 0.638 | 24.36 | 0.781 |
| 10 | Lee Filter + gradient | 0.636 | 24.04 | 0.77 |
| 11 | Range-Doppler + gradient | 0.621 | 23.97 | 0.767 |
| 12 | Chirp Scaling + gradient | 0.582 | 22.21 | 0.699 |
| 13 | Matched Filter + gradient | 0.580 | 21.86 | 0.684 |
Spec Ranges (3 parameters)
| Parameter | Min | Max | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| cross_talk_between_polarizations | -10.0 | 5.0 | dB |
| channel_imbalance | -0.2 | 0.4 | dB |
| faraday_rotation | -1.0 | 2.0 | deg |
Blind evaluation tier — no ground truth available.
What you get & how to use
What you get: Measurements (y), ideal forward operator (H), and spec ranges only.
How to use: Apply your pipeline from the Public tier. Use consistency as self-check.
What to submit: Reconstructed signals and corrected spec. Scored server-side.
Dev Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SARFormer + gradient | 0.742 | 29.8 | 0.914 |
| 2 | DiffusionSAR + gradient | 0.693 | 27.07 | 0.86 |
| 3 | SARDenoiserViT + gradient | 0.688 | 27.53 | 0.871 |
| 4 | PanSharpener++ + gradient | 0.677 | 26.59 | 0.848 |
| 5 | SAR-CAM + gradient | 0.656 | 25.39 | 0.814 |
| 6 | ScoreSAR + gradient | 0.643 | 24.9 | 0.799 |
| 7 | SAR-DRN + gradient | 0.623 | 24.73 | 0.793 |
| 8 | Range-Doppler + gradient | 0.606 | 23.96 | 0.767 |
| 9 | SAR-BM3D + gradient | 0.605 | 23.49 | 0.75 |
| 10 | Chirp Scaling + gradient | 0.593 | 23.17 | 0.738 |
| 11 | Lee Filter + gradient | 0.560 | 22.21 | 0.699 |
| 12 | SAR-ResNet + gradient | 0.541 | 21.38 | 0.663 |
| 13 | Matched Filter + gradient | 0.493 | 19.72 | 0.585 |
Spec Ranges (3 parameters)
| Parameter | Min | Max | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| cross_talk_between_polarizations | -9.0 | 6.0 | dB |
| channel_imbalance | -0.24 | 0.36 | dB |
| faraday_rotation | -1.2 | 1.8 | deg |
Fully blind server-side evaluation — no data download.
What you get & how to use
What you get: No data downloadable. Algorithm runs server-side on hidden measurements.
How to use: Package algorithm as Docker container / Python script. Submit via link.
What to submit: Containerized algorithm accepting y + H, outputting x_hat + corrected spec.
Hidden Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SARFormer + gradient | 0.703 | 27.83 | 0.877 |
| 2 | PanSharpener++ + gradient | 0.653 | 25.47 | 0.817 |
| 3 | DiffusionSAR + gradient | 0.638 | 25.79 | 0.826 |
| 4 | ScoreSAR + gradient | 0.630 | 24.67 | 0.792 |
| 5 | SARDenoiserViT + gradient | 0.620 | 24.62 | 0.79 |
| 6 | Range-Doppler + gradient | 0.588 | 23.46 | 0.749 |
| 7 | SAR-CAM + gradient | 0.578 | 23.08 | 0.734 |
| 8 | SAR-DRN + gradient | 0.566 | 22.82 | 0.724 |
| 9 | Chirp Scaling + gradient | 0.557 | 21.51 | 0.669 |
| 10 | SAR-BM3D + gradient | 0.531 | 21.3 | 0.659 |
| 11 | Lee Filter + gradient | 0.515 | 20.89 | 0.641 |
| 12 | Matched Filter + gradient | 0.458 | 18.67 | 0.533 |
| 13 | SAR-ResNet + gradient | 0.420 | 17.68 | 0.484 |
Spec Ranges (3 parameters)
| Parameter | Min | Max | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| cross_talk_between_polarizations | -11.5 | 3.5 | dB |
| channel_imbalance | -0.14 | 0.46 | dB |
| faraday_rotation | -0.7 | 2.3 | deg |
Blind Reconstruction Challenge
ChallengeGiven measurements with unknown mismatch and spec ranges (not exact params), reconstruct the original signal. A method must be evaluated on all three tiers for a complete score. Scored on a composite metric: 0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖).
Measurements y, ideal forward model H, spec ranges
Reconstructed signal x̂
Spec DAG — Forward Model Pipeline
F → M → D
Mismatch Parameters
| Symbol | Parameter | Description | Nominal | Perturbed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| c_b | cross_talk_between_polarizations | Cross-talk between polarizations (dB) | 0.0 | -5.0 |
| c_i | channel_imbalance | Channel imbalance (dB) | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| f_r | faraday_rotation | Faraday rotation (deg) | 0.0 | 1.0 |
Credits System
Spec Primitives Reference (11 primitives)
Free-space or medium propagation kernel (Fresnel, Rayleigh-Sommerfeld).
Spatial or spatio-temporal amplitude modulation (coded aperture, SLM pattern).
Geometric projection operator (Radon transform, fan-beam, cone-beam).
Sampling in the Fourier / k-space domain (MRI, ptychography).
Shift-invariant convolution with a point-spread function (PSF).
Summation along a physical dimension (spectral, temporal, angular).
Sensor readout with gain g and noise model η (Gaussian, Poisson, mixed).
Patterned illumination (block, Hadamard, random) applied to the scene.
Spectral dispersion element (prism, grating) with shift α and aperture a.
Sample or gantry rotation (CT, electron tomography).
Spectral filter or monochromator selecting a wavelength band.