Ocean Color Remote Sensing
Ocean Color Remote Sensing
Standard reconstruction benchmark — forward model perfectly known, no calibration needed. Score = 0.5 × clip((PSNR−15)/30, 0, 1) + 0.5 × SSIM
| # | Method | Score | PSNR (dB) | SSIM | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🥇 |
AquaFormer
AquaFormer Ocean color transformer, 2024
32.5 dB
SSIM 0.910
Checkpoint unavailable
|
0.747 | 32.5 | 0.910 | ✓ Certified | Ocean color transformer, 2024 |
| 🥈 |
OC-Net
OC-Net Pahlevan et al., RSE 2022
30.5 dB
SSIM 0.870
Checkpoint unavailable
|
0.693 | 30.5 | 0.870 | ✓ Certified | Pahlevan et al., RSE 2022 |
| 🥉 | MUMM | 0.553 | 26.0 | 0.740 | ✓ Certified | Ruddick et al., RSE 2000 |
| 4 | Gordon AC | 0.430 | 22.5 | 0.610 | ✓ Certified | Gordon & Wang, Appl. Opt. 1994 |
Dataset: PWM Benchmark (4 algorithms)
Blind Reconstruction Challenge — forward model has unknown mismatch, must calibrate from data. Score = 0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖)
| # | Method | Overall Score | Public PSNR / SSIM |
Dev PSNR / SSIM |
Hidden PSNR / SSIM |
Trust | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🥇 | AquaFormer + gradient | 0.712 |
0.751
30.61 dB / 0.926
|
0.713
28.17 dB / 0.884
|
0.673
26.23 dB / 0.838
|
✓ Certified | Ocean color retrieval transformer, 2024 |
| 🥈 | OC-Net + gradient | 0.624 |
0.709
27.8 dB / 0.877
|
0.608
23.38 dB / 0.746
|
0.556
22.44 dB / 0.708
|
✓ Certified | Pahlevan et al., RSE 2022 |
| 🥉 | MUMM + gradient | 0.593 |
0.612
23.37 dB / 0.745
|
0.589
22.71 dB / 0.720
|
0.578
22.81 dB / 0.724
|
✓ Certified | Ruddick et al., RSE 2000 |
| 4 | Gordon AC + gradient | 0.474 |
0.557
21.03 dB / 0.647
|
0.453
18.03 dB / 0.501
|
0.411
16.84 dB / 0.442
|
✓ Certified | Gordon & Wang, Appl. Opt. 1994 |
Complete score requires all 3 tiers (Public + Dev + Hidden).
Join the competition →Full-access development tier with all data visible.
What you get & how to use
What you get: Measurements (y), ideal forward operator (H), spec ranges, ground truth (x_true), and true mismatch spec.
How to use: Load HDF5 → compare reconstruction vs x_true → check consistency → iterate.
What to submit: Reconstructed signals (x_hat) and corrected spec as HDF5.
Public Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AquaFormer + gradient | 0.751 | 30.61 | 0.926 |
| 2 | OC-Net + gradient | 0.709 | 27.8 | 0.877 |
| 3 | MUMM + gradient | 0.612 | 23.37 | 0.745 |
| 4 | Gordon AC + gradient | 0.557 | 21.03 | 0.647 |
Spec Ranges (3 parameters)
| Parameter | Min | Max | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| atmospheric_correction_error | -3.0 | 6.0 | - |
| sun_glint_contamination | -4.0 | 8.0 | - |
| vicarious_calibration_offset | -0.6 | 1.2 | - |
Blind evaluation tier — no ground truth available.
What you get & how to use
What you get: Measurements (y), ideal forward operator (H), and spec ranges only.
How to use: Apply your pipeline from the Public tier. Use consistency as self-check.
What to submit: Reconstructed signals and corrected spec. Scored server-side.
Dev Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AquaFormer + gradient | 0.713 | 28.17 | 0.884 |
| 2 | OC-Net + gradient | 0.608 | 23.38 | 0.746 |
| 3 | MUMM + gradient | 0.589 | 22.71 | 0.72 |
| 4 | Gordon AC + gradient | 0.453 | 18.03 | 0.501 |
Spec Ranges (3 parameters)
| Parameter | Min | Max | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| atmospheric_correction_error | -3.6 | 5.4 | - |
| sun_glint_contamination | -4.8 | 7.2 | - |
| vicarious_calibration_offset | -0.72 | 1.08 | - |
Fully blind server-side evaluation — no data download.
What you get & how to use
What you get: No data downloadable. Algorithm runs server-side on hidden measurements.
How to use: Package algorithm as Docker container / Python script. Submit via link.
What to submit: Containerized algorithm accepting y + H, outputting x_hat + corrected spec.
Hidden Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AquaFormer + gradient | 0.673 | 26.23 | 0.838 |
| 2 | MUMM + gradient | 0.578 | 22.81 | 0.724 |
| 3 | OC-Net + gradient | 0.556 | 22.44 | 0.708 |
| 4 | Gordon AC + gradient | 0.411 | 16.84 | 0.442 |
Spec Ranges (3 parameters)
| Parameter | Min | Max | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| atmospheric_correction_error | -2.1 | 6.9 | - |
| sun_glint_contamination | -2.8 | 9.2 | - |
| vicarious_calibration_offset | -0.42 | 1.38 | - |
Blind Reconstruction Challenge
ChallengeGiven measurements with unknown mismatch and spec ranges (not exact params), reconstruct the original signal. A method must be evaluated on all three tiers for a complete score. Scored on a composite metric: 0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖).
Measurements y, ideal forward model H, spec ranges
Reconstructed signal x̂
Spec DAG — Forward Model Pipeline
M → Σ → D
Mismatch Parameters
| Symbol | Parameter | Description | Nominal | Perturbed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| a_c | atmospheric_correction_error | Atmospheric correction error (-) | 0.0 | 3.0 |
| s_g | sun_glint_contamination | Sun glint contamination (-) | 0.0 | 4.0 |
| v_c | vicarious_calibration_offset | Vicarious calibration offset (-) | 0.0 | 0.6 |
Credits System
Spec Primitives Reference (11 primitives)
Free-space or medium propagation kernel (Fresnel, Rayleigh-Sommerfeld).
Spatial or spatio-temporal amplitude modulation (coded aperture, SLM pattern).
Geometric projection operator (Radon transform, fan-beam, cone-beam).
Sampling in the Fourier / k-space domain (MRI, ptychography).
Shift-invariant convolution with a point-spread function (PSF).
Summation along a physical dimension (spectral, temporal, angular).
Sensor readout with gain g and noise model η (Gaussian, Poisson, mixed).
Patterned illumination (block, Hadamard, random) applied to the scene.
Spectral dispersion element (prism, grating) with shift α and aperture a.
Sample or gantry rotation (CT, electron tomography).
Spectral filter or monochromator selecting a wavelength band.