Public
Multispectral Satellite Imaging — Public Tier
(3 scenes)Full-access development tier with all data visible.
What you get
Measurements (y), ideal forward operator (H), spec ranges, ground truth (x_true), and true mismatch spec.
How to use
Load HDF5 → compare reconstruction vs x_true → check consistency → iterate.
What to submit
Reconstructed signals (x_hat) and corrected spec as HDF5.
Parameter Specifications
✓
True spec visible — use these exact values for Scenario III oracle reconstruction.
| Parameter | Spec Range | True Value | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| band_registration_error | -0.2 – 0.4 | 0.1 | px |
| atmospheric_transmittance | 0.83 – 0.89 | 0.86 | - |
| radiometric_calibration | 0.99 – 1.02 | 1.005 | - |
| pointing_jitter | -0.1 – 0.2 | 0.05 | px |
InverseNet Baseline Scores
Method: CPU_baseline — Mismatch parameter: nominal
Scenario I (Ideal)
9.15 dB
SSIM 0.0293
Scenario II (Mismatch)
9.19 dB
SSIM 0.0317
Scenario III (Oracle)
12.14 dB
SSIM 0.0697
Per-scene breakdown (4 scenes)
| Scene | PSNR I | SSIM I | PSNR II | SSIM II | PSNR III | SSIM III |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| scene_00 | 9.16 | 0.0297 | 9.22 | 0.0309 | 12.17 | 0.0677 |
| scene_01 | 9.15 | 0.0294 | 9.16 | 0.0324 | 12.11 | 0.0709 |
| scene_02 | 9.12 | 0.0284 | 9.22 | 0.0318 | 12.17 | 0.0694 |
| scene_03 | 9.15 | 0.0298 | 9.16 | 0.0316 | 12.11 | 0.0708 |
Public Tier Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM | Consistency | Trust | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FlowCompute + gradient | 0.846 | 36.73 | 0.977 | 0.94 | ✓ Certified | Huang et al., ECCV 2025 |
| 2 | Restormer + gradient | 0.820 | 34.64 | 0.965 | 0.94 | ✓ Certified | Zamir et al., CVPR 2022 |
| 3 | DiffusionCompute + gradient | 0.820 | 35.05 | 0.968 | 0.91 | ✓ Certified | Zhang et al., NeurIPS 2024 |
| 4 | NAFNet + gradient | 0.816 | 34.27 | 0.963 | 0.94 | ✓ Certified | Chen et al., ICCV 2023 |
| 5 | CompFormer + gradient | 0.811 | 34.85 | 0.967 | 0.88 | ✓ Certified | Liu et al., ICCV 2024 |
| 6 | SwinIR + gradient | 0.809 | 34.06 | 0.961 | 0.92 | ✓ Certified | Liang et al., ICCVW 2021 |
| 7 | Deep Image Prior + gradient | 0.764 | 31.27 | 0.934 | 0.89 | ✓ Certified | Ulyanov et al., CVPR 2018 |
| 8 | PnP-ADMM + gradient | 0.717 | 28.24 | 0.886 | 0.9 | ✓ Certified | Venkatakrishnan et al., 2013 |
| 9 | PnP-RED + gradient | 0.705 | 27.6 | 0.872 | 0.9 | ✓ Certified | Romano et al., IEEE TIP 2017 |
| 10 | Plug-and-Play + gradient | 0.691 | 27.27 | 0.865 | 0.86 | ✓ Certified | Sreehari et al., IEEE TIP 2016 |
| 11 | LSQR + gradient | 0.685 | 26.18 | 0.837 | 0.94 | ✓ Certified | Paige & Saunders, TOMS 1982 |
| 12 | ART + gradient | 0.671 | 26.21 | 0.838 | 0.87 | ✓ Certified | Gordon et al., J. Theor. Biol. 1970 |
| 13 | Tikhonov + gradient | 0.622 | 23.79 | 0.761 | 0.9 | ✓ Certified | Tikhonov, Doklady Akad. Nauk SSSR 1963 |
Visible Data Fields
y
H_ideal
spec_ranges
x_true
true_spec
Dataset
Format: HDF5
Scenes: 3
Scoring Formula
0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖)
PSNR: 40%
SSIM: 40%
Consistency: 20%