Dev
MR Elastography (MRE) — Dev Tier
(3 scenes)Blind evaluation tier — no ground truth available.
What you get
Measurements (y), ideal forward operator (H), and spec ranges only.
How to use
Apply your pipeline from the Public tier. Use consistency as self-check.
What to submit
Reconstructed signals and corrected spec. Scored server-side.
Parameter Specifications
🔒
True spec hidden — estimate parameters from spec ranges below.
| Parameter | Spec Range | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| shear_wave_frequency_error | -2.4 – 3.6 | - |
| wave_attenuation_model | -0.15 – 0.15 | - |
| motion_encoding_gradient_error | -1.2 – 1.8 | - |
| boundary_reflection | -4.8 – 7.2 | amplitude |
Dev Tier Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM | Consistency | Trust | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SwinMR++ + gradient | 0.855 | 38.56 | 0.984 | 0.88 | ✓ Certified | Huang et al., IEEE TMI 2025 — multi-scale axial attention + INR head + k-space DC per module + LPIPS+SSIM+k-space joint loss + dynamic feature fusion |
| 2 | ReconFormer++ + gradient | 0.842 | 38.24 | 0.983 | 0.83 | ✓ Certified | Pan et al., IEEE TMI 2025 |
| 3 | PnP-DnCNN-Pro + gradient | 0.827 | 37.5 | 0.98 | 0.8 | ✓ Certified | PnP-DnCNN-Pro IEEE TMI 2025 (DOI:10.1109/TMI.2025.3441240) — multi-scale DnCNN denoiser + adaptive mu/sigma schedule + SIREN INR output head + joint LPIPS+SSIM denoiser training + dynamic PnP regularization scheduling |
| 4 | HUMUS-Net++ + gradient | 0.821 | 35.46 | 0.97 | 0.89 | ✓ Certified | Fabian et al., dHUMUS-Net 2023 — k-space DC per module + dynamic multi-scale weighting + INR head + perceptual-structural loss + axial attention |
| 5 | HUMUS-Net + gradient | 0.800 | 34.74 | 0.966 | 0.83 | ✓ Certified | Fabian et al., NeurIPS 2022 |
| 6 | HybridCascade++ + gradient | 0.797 | 35.13 | 0.969 | 0.79 | ✓ Certified | HybridCascade++ MICCAI 2021 + IEEE TMI 2025 — multi-scale cascade DC + SIREN INR warm-start + SSIM structural anchor + DRUNet polish + freq-blend LF/HF fusion |
| 7 | PromptMR-SFM + gradient | 0.795 | 33.62 | 0.958 | 0.88 | ✓ Certified | PWM 2026 |
| 8 | MRDynamo + gradient | 0.791 | 32.98 | 0.952 | 0.9 | ✓ Certified | Chen et al., NeurIPS 2024 |
| 9 | PromptMR + gradient | 0.785 | 32.87 | 0.951 | 0.88 | ✓ Certified | Bai et al., ECCV 2024 |
| 10 | MRI-FM + gradient | 0.783 | 32.81 | 0.951 | 0.87 | ✓ Certified | Wang et al., Nature MI 2026 |
| 11 | MR-IPT + gradient | 0.781 | 33.45 | 0.956 | 0.82 | ✓ Certified | Sci. Reports 2025 |
| 12 | MoDL-Net++ + gradient | 0.779 | 32.99 | 0.952 | 0.84 | ✓ Certified | MoDL-Net++ IEEE TMI 2025 — multi-scale pyramid fusion + RDN/Swin deep prior + differentiable DC layers + LPIPS+SSIM+L1 joint loss + two-stage training strategy |
| 13 | MRI-DiffusionNet + gradient | 0.772 | 33.06 | 0.953 | 0.8 | ✓ Certified | Song et al., ICCV 2024 |
| 14 | U-Net++ + gradient | 0.769 | 31.55 | 0.938 | 0.89 | ✓ Certified | Chen & Boning, IEEE TMI 2024 (DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2024.3367890) — Residual U-Net + data consistency layers + plug-and-play prior + residual connections + dense skip paths |
| 15 | BrainID-MRI + gradient | 0.768 | 32.48 | 0.948 | 0.82 | ✓ Certified | Liu et al., CVPR 2025 |
| 16 | SwinMR + gradient | 0.767 | 32.28 | 0.946 | 0.83 | ✓ Certified | Huang et al., MICCAI 2022 |
| 17 | ReconFormer + gradient | 0.766 | 31.63 | 0.939 | 0.87 | ✓ Certified | Guo et al., IEEE TMI 2024 |
| 18 | PnP-DnCNN + gradient | 0.757 | 31.29 | 0.935 | 0.85 | ✓ Certified | Ahmad et al., IEEE TCI 2019 (DOI:10.1109/TCI.2019.2944521) |
| 19 | MMR-Mamba + gradient | 0.751 | 30.52 | 0.924 | 0.88 | ✓ Certified | Zhao et al., Med. Image Anal. 2025 |
| 20 | BM3D-MRI + gradient | 0.740 | 30.18 | 0.92 | 0.85 | ✓ Certified | Eksioglu, Comput. Math. Meth. Med. 2016 |
| 21 | E2E-VarNet + gradient | 0.722 | 29.83 | 0.914 | 0.79 | ✓ Certified | Sriram et al., MICCAI 2020 |
| 22 | HybridCascade + gradient | 0.695 | 27.08 | 0.86 | 0.9 | ✓ Certified | Fastmri, arXiv 2020 |
| 23 | DCCNN + gradient | 0.694 | 28.22 | 0.885 | 0.79 | ✓ Certified | Schlemper et al., IEEE TMI 2018 |
| 24 | SENSE + gradient | 0.693 | 26.99 | 0.858 | 0.9 | ✓ Certified | Pruessmann et al., MRM 1999 |
| 25 | GRAPPA + gradient | 0.683 | 26.81 | 0.853 | 0.87 | ✓ Certified | Griswold et al., MRM 2002 |
| 26 | LORAKS + gradient | 0.680 | 27.04 | 0.859 | 0.83 | ✓ Certified | Haldar, IEEE TMI 2014 |
| 27 | k-t SPARSE-SENSE + gradient | 0.680 | 26.82 | 0.854 | 0.85 | ✓ Certified | Lustig et al., MRM 2006 |
| 28 | U-Net + gradient | 0.659 | 26.19 | 0.837 | 0.81 | ✓ Certified | Zbontar et al., arXiv 2018 |
| 29 | MoDL + gradient | 0.658 | 26.26 | 0.839 | 0.8 | ✓ Certified | Aggarwal et al., IEEE TMI 2019 |
| 30 | Deep-ADMM-Net + gradient | 0.655 | 25.47 | 0.817 | 0.87 | ✓ Certified | Yang et al., NeurIPS 2016 |
| 31 | ALOHA + gradient | 0.645 | 25.38 | 0.814 | 0.83 | ✓ Certified | Jin et al., IEEE TMI 2016 |
| 32 | L1-Wavelet + gradient | 0.642 | 25.31 | 0.812 | 0.82 | ✓ Certified | Lustig et al., MRM 2007 |
| 33 | Score-MRI + gradient | 0.623 | 24.06 | 0.771 | 0.87 | ✓ Certified | Chung & Ye, Med. Image Anal. 2022 |
| 34 | ESPIRiT + gradient | 0.604 | 23.64 | 0.755 | 0.83 | ✓ Certified | Uecker et al., MRM 2014 |
| 35 | Zero-Filled IFFT + gradient | 0.559 | 21.44 | 0.666 | 0.89 | ✓ Certified | Pruessmann et al., MRM 1999 |
Visible Data Fields
y
H_ideal
spec_ranges
Dataset
Format: HDF5
Scenes: 3
Scoring Formula
0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖)
PSNR: 40%
SSIM: 40%
Consistency: 20%