Public
Magnetic Particle Imaging (MPI) — Public Tier
(5 scenes)Full-access development tier with all data visible.
What you get
Measurements (y), ideal forward operator (H), spec ranges, ground truth (x_true), and true mismatch spec.
How to use
Load HDF5 → compare reconstruction vs x_true → check consistency → iterate.
What to submit
Reconstructed signals (x_hat) and corrected spec as HDF5.
Parameter Specifications
✓
True spec visible — use these exact values for Scenario III oracle reconstruction.
| Parameter | Spec Range | True Value | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| drive_field_amplitude | 24.4 – 26.2 | 25.3 | mT |
| selection_field_gradient | 2.4 – 2.7 | 2.55 | T/m |
| particle_relaxation_time | 1.8 – 2.4 | 2.1 | us |
| receive_coil_sensitivity | 0.97 – 1.06 | 1.015 | - |
InverseNet Baseline Scores
Method: CPU_baseline — Mismatch parameter: nominal
Scenario I (Ideal)
7.77 dB
SSIM 0.3772
Scenario II (Mismatch)
7.61 dB
SSIM 0.1940
Scenario III (Oracle)
15.93 dB
SSIM 0.4222
Per-scene breakdown (4 scenes)
| Scene | PSNR I | SSIM I | PSNR II | SSIM II | PSNR III | SSIM III |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| scene_00 | 7.57 | 0.3615 | 7.48 | 0.1918 | 15.88 | 0.4337 |
| scene_01 | 7.70 | 0.3833 | 7.85 | 0.1983 | 15.89 | 0.4210 |
| scene_02 | 7.97 | 0.3846 | 7.45 | 0.1929 | 16.02 | 0.4175 |
| scene_03 | 7.84 | 0.3794 | 7.67 | 0.1931 | 15.94 | 0.4166 |
Public Tier Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM | Consistency | Trust | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SwinIR + gradient | 0.793 | 32.39 | 0.947 | 0.95 | ✓ Certified | Liang et al., ICCVW 2021 |
| 2 | ResUNet + gradient | 0.771 | 30.94 | 0.93 | 0.95 | ✓ Certified | Residual U-Net baseline |
| 3 | ExpFormer + gradient | 0.766 | 30.55 | 0.925 | 0.95 | ✓ Certified | Experimental science transformer, 2024 |
| 4 | ScoreExperimental + gradient | 0.765 | 31.57 | 0.938 | 0.87 | ✓ Certified | Wei et al., 2025 |
| 5 | Domain-Adapted-CNN + gradient | 0.737 | 29.25 | 0.905 | 0.91 | ✓ Certified | Domain adaptation CNN |
| 6 | DiffusionExperimental + gradient | 0.715 | 28.38 | 0.889 | 0.88 | ✓ Certified | Zhang et al., 2024 |
| 7 | PnP-ADMM + gradient | 0.694 | 27.02 | 0.859 | 0.9 | ✓ Certified | ADMM + denoiser prior |
| 8 | PnP-RED + gradient | 0.686 | 27.04 | 0.859 | 0.86 | ✓ Certified | Romano et al., IEEE TIP 2017 |
| 9 | Wiener Filter + gradient | 0.675 | 25.64 | 0.822 | 0.95 | ✓ Certified | Wiener filtering baseline |
| 10 | Matched Filter + gradient | 0.620 | 23.52 | 0.751 | 0.92 | ✓ Certified | Optimal linear filter |
| 11 | Tikhonov + gradient | 0.602 | 23.14 | 0.737 | 0.88 | ✓ Certified | Tikhonov, Doklady 1963 |
Visible Data Fields
y
H_ideal
spec_ranges
x_true
true_spec
Dataset
Format: HDF5
Scenes: 5
Scoring Formula
0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖)
PSNR: 40%
SSIM: 40%
Consistency: 20%