Machine Vision / AOI
Machine Vision / AOI
Standard reconstruction benchmark — forward model perfectly known, no calibration needed. Score = 0.5 × clip((PSNR−15)/30, 0, 1) + 0.5 × SSIM
| # | Method | Score | PSNR (dB) | SSIM | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🥇 |
UniAD
UniAD You et al., NeurIPS 2022
34.61 dB
SSIM 0.965
Checkpoint unavailable
|
0.809 | 34.61 | 0.965 | ✓ Certified | You et al., NeurIPS 2022 |
| 🥈 |
PatchCore
PatchCore Roth et al., CVPR 2022
31.24 dB
SSIM 0.934
Checkpoint unavailable
|
0.738 | 31.24 | 0.934 | ✓ Certified | Roth et al., CVPR 2022 |
| 🥉 | PnP-ADMM | 0.672 | 29.7 | 0.855 | ✓ Certified | ADMM + denoiser prior |
| 4 | Template Match | 0.646 | 27.59 | 0.872 | ✓ Certified | Brunelli, Template Matching, 2009 |
Dataset: PWM Benchmark (4 algorithms)
Blind Reconstruction Challenge — forward model has unknown mismatch, must calibrate from data. Score = 0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖)
| # | Method | Overall Score | Public PSNR / SSIM |
Dev PSNR / SSIM |
Hidden PSNR / SSIM |
Trust | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🥇 | UniAD + gradient | 0.746 |
0.800
33.21 dB / 0.954
|
0.742
30.05 dB / 0.918
|
0.695
27.7 dB / 0.874
|
✓ Certified | You et al., NeurIPS 2022 |
| 🥈 | PatchCore + gradient | 0.650 |
0.728
29.11 dB / 0.902
|
0.620
23.78 dB / 0.761
|
0.601
23.58 dB / 0.753
|
✓ Certified | Roth et al., CVPR 2022 |
| 🥉 | Template Match + gradient | 0.631 |
0.680
25.88 dB / 0.829
|
0.631
24.82 dB / 0.796
|
0.581
22.66 dB / 0.717
|
✓ Certified | Brunelli, Template Matching, 2009 |
| 4 | PnP-ADMM + gradient | 0.622 |
0.696
27.11 dB / 0.861
|
0.601
23.73 dB / 0.759
|
0.568
22.39 dB / 0.706
|
✓ Certified | Venkatakrishnan et al., 2013 |
Complete score requires all 3 tiers (Public + Dev + Hidden).
Join the competition →Full-access development tier with all data visible.
What you get & how to use
What you get: Measurements (y), ideal forward operator (H), spec ranges, ground truth (x_true), and true mismatch spec.
How to use: Load HDF5 → compare reconstruction vs x_true → check consistency → iterate.
What to submit: Reconstructed signals (x_hat) and corrected spec as HDF5.
Public Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | UniAD + gradient | 0.800 | 33.21 | 0.954 |
| 2 | PatchCore + gradient | 0.728 | 29.11 | 0.902 |
| 3 | PnP-ADMM + gradient | 0.696 | 27.11 | 0.861 |
| 4 | Template Match + gradient | 0.680 | 25.88 | 0.829 |
Spec Ranges (4 parameters)
| Parameter | Min | Max | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| focus_distance_error | -1.0 | 2.0 | mm |
| lens_distortion_k1 | -0.02 | 0.04 | - |
| exposure_time_drift | 9.6 | 10.8 | ms |
| white_balance_gain | 0.98 | 1.04 | - |
Blind evaluation tier — no ground truth available.
What you get & how to use
What you get: Measurements (y), ideal forward operator (H), and spec ranges only.
How to use: Apply your pipeline from the Public tier. Use consistency as self-check.
What to submit: Reconstructed signals and corrected spec. Scored server-side.
Dev Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | UniAD + gradient | 0.742 | 30.05 | 0.918 |
| 2 | Template Match + gradient | 0.631 | 24.82 | 0.796 |
| 3 | PatchCore + gradient | 0.620 | 23.78 | 0.761 |
| 4 | PnP-ADMM + gradient | 0.601 | 23.73 | 0.759 |
Spec Ranges (4 parameters)
| Parameter | Min | Max | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| focus_distance_error | -1.2 | 1.8 | mm |
| lens_distortion_k1 | -0.024 | 0.036 | - |
| exposure_time_drift | 9.52 | 10.72 | ms |
| white_balance_gain | 0.976 | 1.036 | - |
Fully blind server-side evaluation — no data download.
What you get & how to use
What you get: No data downloadable. Algorithm runs server-side on hidden measurements.
How to use: Package algorithm as Docker container / Python script. Submit via link.
What to submit: Containerized algorithm accepting y + H, outputting x_hat + corrected spec.
Hidden Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | UniAD + gradient | 0.695 | 27.7 | 0.874 |
| 2 | PatchCore + gradient | 0.601 | 23.58 | 0.753 |
| 3 | Template Match + gradient | 0.581 | 22.66 | 0.717 |
| 4 | PnP-ADMM + gradient | 0.568 | 22.39 | 0.706 |
Spec Ranges (4 parameters)
| Parameter | Min | Max | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| focus_distance_error | -0.7 | 2.3 | mm |
| lens_distortion_k1 | -0.014 | 0.046 | - |
| exposure_time_drift | 9.72 | 10.92 | ms |
| white_balance_gain | 0.986 | 1.046 | - |
Blind Reconstruction Challenge
ChallengeGiven measurements with unknown mismatch and spec ranges (not exact params), reconstruct the original signal. A method must be evaluated on all three tiers for a complete score. Scored on a composite metric: 0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖).
Measurements y, ideal forward model H, spec ranges
Reconstructed signal x̂
Spec DAG — Forward Model Pipeline
C → D
Mismatch Parameters
| Symbol | Parameter | Description | Nominal | Perturbed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| f_d | focus_distance_error | Focus distance error (mm) | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| l_d | lens_distortion_k1 | Lens distortion k1 (-) | 0.0 | 0.02 |
| e_t | exposure_time_drift | Exposure time drift (ms) | 10.0 | 10.4 |
| w_b | white_balance_gain | White balance gain (-) | 1.0 | 1.02 |
Credits System
Spec Primitives Reference (11 primitives)
Free-space or medium propagation kernel (Fresnel, Rayleigh-Sommerfeld).
Spatial or spatio-temporal amplitude modulation (coded aperture, SLM pattern).
Geometric projection operator (Radon transform, fan-beam, cone-beam).
Sampling in the Fourier / k-space domain (MRI, ptychography).
Shift-invariant convolution with a point-spread function (PSF).
Summation along a physical dimension (spectral, temporal, angular).
Sensor readout with gain g and noise model η (Gaussian, Poisson, mixed).
Patterned illumination (block, Hadamard, random) applied to the scene.
Spectral dispersion element (prism, grating) with shift α and aperture a.
Sample or gantry rotation (CT, electron tomography).
Spectral filter or monochromator selecting a wavelength band.