Public
Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS) Imaging — Public Tier
(5 scenes)Full-access development tier with all data visible.
What you get
Measurements (y), ideal forward operator (H), spec ranges, ground truth (x_true), and true mismatch spec.
How to use
Load HDF5 → compare reconstruction vs x_true → check consistency → iterate.
What to submit
Reconstructed signals (x_hat) and corrected spec as HDF5.
Parameter Specifications
✓
True spec visible — use these exact values for Scenario III oracle reconstruction.
| Parameter | Spec Range | True Value | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| laser_energy_fluctuation | -2.0 – 4.0 | 1.0 | - |
| matrix_effect | -6.0 – 12.0 | 3.0 | - |
| self_absorption_correction | -4.0 – 8.0 | 2.0 | - |
| crater_to_crater_variation | -3.0 – 6.0 | 1.5 | - |
InverseNet Baseline Scores
Method: CPU_baseline — Mismatch parameter: nominal
Scenario I (Ideal)
20.86 dB
SSIM 0.5556
Scenario II (Mismatch)
17.94 dB
SSIM 0.2739
Scenario III (Oracle)
21.09 dB
SSIM 0.4477
Per-scene breakdown (4 scenes)
| Scene | PSNR I | SSIM I | PSNR II | SSIM II | PSNR III | SSIM III |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| scene_00 | 22.20 | 0.5293 | 20.35 | 0.2280 | 21.93 | 0.3469 |
| scene_01 | 22.95 | 0.6386 | 19.17 | 0.3063 | 21.54 | 0.4791 |
| scene_02 | 17.62 | 0.5116 | 14.75 | 0.2820 | 20.16 | 0.5023 |
| scene_03 | 20.65 | 0.5429 | 17.50 | 0.2793 | 20.72 | 0.4626 |
Public Tier Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM | Consistency | Trust | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cascade-UNet + gradient | 0.779 | 31.84 | 0.941 | 0.92 | ✓ Certified | Physics-informed UNet, 2025 |
| 2 | DiffusionSpectra + gradient | 0.766 | 31.35 | 0.935 | 0.89 | ✓ Certified | Zhang et al., 2024 |
| 3 | SpectraFormer + gradient | 0.762 | 31.49 | 0.937 | 0.86 | ✓ Certified | Spectroscopy transformer, 2024 |
| 4 | PINN-Spectra + gradient | 0.758 | 30.35 | 0.922 | 0.93 | ✓ Certified | Physics-informed neural network |
| 5 | CDAE + gradient | 0.757 | 30.27 | 0.921 | 0.93 | ✓ Certified | Zhang et al., Sensors 2024 |
| 6 | ScoreSpectra + gradient | 0.726 | 28.85 | 0.898 | 0.89 | ✓ Certified | Wei et al., 2025 |
| 7 | U-Net-Spectra + gradient | 0.713 | 27.58 | 0.872 | 0.94 | ✓ Certified | Spectral U-Net variant |
| 8 | PnP-DnCNN + gradient | 0.693 | 26.81 | 0.853 | 0.92 | ✓ Certified | Zhang et al., 2017 |
| 9 | SVD + gradient | 0.630 | 24.2 | 0.776 | 0.89 | ✓ Certified | Singular Value Decomposition |
| 10 | SG-ALS + gradient | 0.573 | 22.02 | 0.691 | 0.88 | ✓ Certified | Savitzky-Golay + ALS baseline |
| 11 | Baseline Correction + gradient | 0.570 | 21.76 | 0.68 | 0.9 | ✓ Certified | Polynomial fitting baseline |
Visible Data Fields
y
H_ideal
spec_ranges
x_true
true_spec
Dataset
Format: HDF5
Scenes: 5
Scoring Formula
0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖)
PSNR: 40%
SSIM: 40%
Consistency: 20%