Dev
Intravascular Ultrasound (IVUS) — Dev Tier
(3 scenes)Blind evaluation tier — no ground truth available.
What you get
Measurements (y), ideal forward operator (H), and spec ranges only.
How to use
Apply your pipeline from the Public tier. Use consistency as self-check.
What to submit
Reconstructed signals and corrected spec. Scored server-side.
Parameter Specifications
🔒
True spec hidden — estimate parameters from spec ranges below.
| Parameter | Spec Range | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| catheter_rotation_non_uniformity | -2.4 – 3.6 | - |
| ring_down_artifact | -4.8 – 7.2 | - |
| sound_speed_in_plaque | 1501.6 – 1597.6 | m/s |
Dev Tier Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM | Consistency | Trust | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BeamFormer + gradient | 0.734 | 29.36 | 0.907 | 0.89 | ✓ Certified | Li et al., ICCV 2024 |
| 2 | UltrasoundFormer + gradient | 0.730 | 30.18 | 0.92 | 0.8 | ✓ Certified | Park et al., CVPR 2024 |
| 3 | ScoreUS + gradient | 0.727 | 29.63 | 0.911 | 0.83 | ✓ Certified | Johnson et al., ECCV 2025 |
| 4 | DiffUS + gradient | 0.725 | 29.29 | 0.905 | 0.85 | ✓ Certified | Chen et al., NeurIPS 2024 |
| 5 | AttentionBeam + gradient | 0.709 | 28.27 | 0.886 | 0.86 | ✓ Certified | Xu et al., ECCV 2024 |
| 6 | BeamDATA + gradient | 0.709 | 28.47 | 0.89 | 0.84 | ✓ Certified | Smith et al., ICCV 2024 |
| 7 | Phase-ADMM-Net + gradient | 0.680 | 26.45 | 0.844 | 0.89 | ✓ Certified | Hou et al., IEEE TMI 2022 |
| 8 | PnP-TV + gradient | 0.651 | 25.19 | 0.808 | 0.88 | ✓ Certified | TV regularization for ultrasound |
| 9 | DAS-CF + gradient | 0.610 | 23.94 | 0.766 | 0.82 | ✓ Certified | Capon filter, IEEE 1969 |
| 10 | PnP-ADMM + gradient | 0.602 | 23.78 | 0.761 | 0.8 | ✓ Certified | Goudarzi et al., 2020 |
| 11 | MU-Net + gradient | 0.574 | 22.82 | 0.724 | 0.78 | ✓ Certified | Hyun et al., IEEE TUFFC 2022 |
| 12 | PW-DAS + gradient | 0.568 | 21.77 | 0.68 | 0.89 | ✓ Certified | Plane wave synthesis baseline |
| 13 | ABLE + gradient | 0.547 | 21.02 | 0.647 | 0.89 | ✓ Certified | Luijten et al., IEEE TMI 2020 |
| 14 | DAS + gradient | 0.534 | 21.2 | 0.655 | 0.8 | ✓ Certified | Analytical baseline |
Visible Data Fields
y
H_ideal
spec_ranges
Dataset
Format: HDF5
Scenes: 3
Scoring Formula
0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖)
PSNR: 40%
SSIM: 40%
Consistency: 20%