Public

Gravitational Wave Detection — Public Tier

(5 scenes)

Full-access development tier with all data visible.

What you get

Measurements (y), ideal forward operator (H), spec ranges, ground truth (x_true), and true mismatch spec.

How to use

Load HDF5 → compare reconstruction vs x_true → check consistency → iterate.

What to submit

Reconstructed signals (x_hat) and corrected spec as HDF5.

Parameter Specifications

✓

True spec visible — use these exact values for Scenario III oracle reconstruction.

Parameter Spec Range True Value Unit
calibration_amplitude 0.99 – 1.02 1.005 -
phase_calibration -0.01 – 0.02 0.005 rad
power_spectral_density -0.15 – 0.15 0.0 1/Hz
timing_offset -0.15 – 0.15 0.0 s

InverseNet Baseline Scores

Method: CPU_baseline — Mismatch parameter: nominal

Scenario I (Ideal)

7.77 dB

SSIM 0.3772

Scenario II (Mismatch)

7.61 dB

SSIM 0.1940

Scenario III (Oracle)

15.93 dB

SSIM 0.4222

Per-scene breakdown (4 scenes)
Scene PSNR I SSIM I PSNR II SSIM II PSNR III SSIM III
scene_00 7.57 0.3615 7.48 0.1918 15.88 0.4337
scene_01 7.70 0.3833 7.85 0.1983 15.89 0.4210
scene_02 7.97 0.3846 7.45 0.1929 16.02 0.4175
scene_03 7.84 0.3794 7.67 0.1931 15.94 0.4166

Public Tier Leaderboard

# Method Score PSNR SSIM Consistency Trust Source
1 WaveFormer + gradient 0.736 28.88 0.898 0.94 ✓ Certified GW detection transformer, 2024
2 GW-CNN + gradient 0.686 26.92 0.856 0.87 ✓ Certified George & Huerta, Phys. Rev. D 2018
3 BayesWave + gradient 0.611 23.01 0.731 0.94 ✓ Certified Cornish & Littenberg, CQG 2015
4 Matched Filter + gradient 0.434 17.06 0.453 0.91 ✓ Certified Allen et al., Phys. Rev. D 2012

Visible Data Fields

y H_ideal spec_ranges x_true true_spec

Dataset

Format: HDF5
Scenes: 5

Scoring Formula

0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖)

PSNR: 40% SSIM: 40% Consistency: 20%
Back to Gravitational Wave Detection