Ground-Penetrating Radar (GPR)
Ground-Penetrating Radar (GPR)
Standard reconstruction benchmark — forward model perfectly known, no calibration needed. Score = 0.5 × clip((PSNR−15)/30, 0, 1) + 0.5 × SSIM
| # | Method | Score | PSNR (dB) | SSIM | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🥇 |
HyperDet
HyperDet GPR detection transformer, 2023
31.5 dB
SSIM 0.905
Checkpoint unavailable
|
0.728 | 31.5 | 0.905 | ✓ Certified | GPR detection transformer, 2023 |
| 🥈 |
GPR-RCNN
GPR-RCNN Pham & Lefevre, JECE 2020
29.8 dB
SSIM 0.870
Checkpoint unavailable
|
0.682 | 29.8 | 0.870 | ✓ Certified | Pham & Lefevre, JECE 2020 |
| 🥉 | RTM | 0.545 | 25.5 | 0.740 | ✓ Certified | Baysal et al., Geophysics 1983 |
| 4 | Kirchhoff Migration | 0.417 | 22.0 | 0.600 | ✓ Certified | Stolt, Geophysics 1978 |
Dataset: PWM Benchmark (4 algorithms)
Blind Reconstruction Challenge — forward model has unknown mismatch, must calibrate from data. Score = 0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖)
| # | Method | Overall Score | Public PSNR / SSIM |
Dev PSNR / SSIM |
Hidden PSNR / SSIM |
Trust | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🥇 | HyperDet + gradient | 0.585 |
0.729
28.95 dB / 0.899
|
0.565
22.09 dB / 0.694
|
0.460
18.15 dB / 0.507
|
✓ Certified | GPR detection transformer, 2023 |
| 🥈 | RTM + gradient | 0.563 |
0.608
23.35 dB / 0.745
|
0.556
22.09 dB / 0.694
|
0.525
21.1 dB / 0.650
|
✓ Certified | Baysal et al., Geophysics 1983 |
| 🥉 | GPR-RCNN + gradient | 0.529 |
0.695
27.01 dB / 0.858
|
0.507
19.92 dB / 0.595
|
0.384
15.85 dB / 0.394
|
✓ Certified | Pham & Lefevre, JECE 2020 |
| 4 | Kirchhoff Migration + gradient | 0.485 |
0.494
19.06 dB / 0.553
|
0.505
19.86 dB / 0.592
|
0.457
18.49 dB / 0.524
|
✓ Certified | Stolt, Geophysics 1978 |
Complete score requires all 3 tiers (Public + Dev + Hidden).
Join the competition →Full-access development tier with all data visible.
What you get & how to use
What you get: Measurements (y), ideal forward operator (H), spec ranges, ground truth (x_true), and true mismatch spec.
How to use: Load HDF5 → compare reconstruction vs x_true → check consistency → iterate.
What to submit: Reconstructed signals (x_hat) and corrected spec as HDF5.
Public Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | HyperDet + gradient | 0.729 | 28.95 | 0.899 |
| 2 | GPR-RCNN + gradient | 0.695 | 27.01 | 0.858 |
| 3 | RTM + gradient | 0.608 | 23.35 | 0.745 |
| 4 | Kirchhoff Migration + gradient | 0.494 | 19.06 | 0.553 |
Spec Ranges (4 parameters)
| Parameter | Min | Max | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| soil_permittivity_error | 7.8 | 11.4 | - |
| antenna_height | -0.01 | 0.02 | m |
| time_zero_offset | -0.1 | 0.2 | ns |
| velocity_model_error | 0.094 | 0.112 | m/ns |
Blind evaluation tier — no ground truth available.
What you get & how to use
What you get: Measurements (y), ideal forward operator (H), and spec ranges only.
How to use: Apply your pipeline from the Public tier. Use consistency as self-check.
What to submit: Reconstructed signals and corrected spec. Scored server-side.
Dev Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | HyperDet + gradient | 0.565 | 22.09 | 0.694 |
| 2 | RTM + gradient | 0.556 | 22.09 | 0.694 |
| 3 | GPR-RCNN + gradient | 0.507 | 19.92 | 0.595 |
| 4 | Kirchhoff Migration + gradient | 0.505 | 19.86 | 0.592 |
Spec Ranges (4 parameters)
| Parameter | Min | Max | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| soil_permittivity_error | 7.56 | 11.16 | - |
| antenna_height | -0.012 | 0.018 | m |
| time_zero_offset | -0.12 | 0.18 | ns |
| velocity_model_error | 0.0928 | 0.1108 | m/ns |
Fully blind server-side evaluation — no data download.
What you get & how to use
What you get: No data downloadable. Algorithm runs server-side on hidden measurements.
How to use: Package algorithm as Docker container / Python script. Submit via link.
What to submit: Containerized algorithm accepting y + H, outputting x_hat + corrected spec.
Hidden Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RTM + gradient | 0.525 | 21.1 | 0.65 |
| 2 | HyperDet + gradient | 0.460 | 18.15 | 0.507 |
| 3 | Kirchhoff Migration + gradient | 0.457 | 18.49 | 0.524 |
| 4 | GPR-RCNN + gradient | 0.384 | 15.85 | 0.394 |
Spec Ranges (4 parameters)
| Parameter | Min | Max | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| soil_permittivity_error | 8.16 | 11.76 | - |
| antenna_height | -0.007 | 0.023 | m |
| time_zero_offset | -0.07 | 0.23 | ns |
| velocity_model_error | 0.0958 | 0.1138 | m/ns |
Blind Reconstruction Challenge
ChallengeGiven measurements with unknown mismatch and spec ranges (not exact params), reconstruct the original signal. A method must be evaluated on all three tiers for a complete score. Scored on a composite metric: 0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖).
Measurements y, ideal forward model H, spec ranges
Reconstructed signal x̂
Spec DAG — Forward Model Pipeline
P → D
Mismatch Parameters
| Symbol | Parameter | Description | Nominal | Perturbed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| s_p | soil_permittivity_error | Soil permittivity error (-) | 9.0 | 10.2 |
| a_h | antenna_height | Antenna height (m) | 0.0 | 0.01 |
| t_z | time_zero_offset | Time zero offset (ns) | 0.0 | 0.1 |
| v_m | velocity_model_error | Velocity model error (m/ns) | 0.1 | 0.106 |
Credits System
Spec Primitives Reference (11 primitives)
Free-space or medium propagation kernel (Fresnel, Rayleigh-Sommerfeld).
Spatial or spatio-temporal amplitude modulation (coded aperture, SLM pattern).
Geometric projection operator (Radon transform, fan-beam, cone-beam).
Sampling in the Fourier / k-space domain (MRI, ptychography).
Shift-invariant convolution with a point-spread function (PSF).
Summation along a physical dimension (spectral, temporal, angular).
Sensor readout with gain g and noise model η (Gaussian, Poisson, mixed).
Patterned illumination (block, Hadamard, random) applied to the scene.
Spectral dispersion element (prism, grating) with shift α and aperture a.
Sample or gantry rotation (CT, electron tomography).
Spectral filter or monochromator selecting a wavelength band.