Dev

Ghost Imaging — Dev Tier

(3 scenes)

Blind evaluation tier — no ground truth available.

What you get

Measurements (y), ideal forward operator (H), and spec ranges only.

How to use

Apply your pipeline from the Public tier. Use consistency as self-check.

What to submit

Reconstructed signals and corrected spec. Scored server-side.

Parameter Specifications

🔒

True spec hidden — estimate parameters from spec ranges below.

Parameter Spec Range Unit
bucket_detector_efficiency 0.82 – 1.12 -
speckle_correlation_mismatch -2.4 – 3.6 -
background_counts -1.2 – 1.8 -
number_of_measurements -11600.0 – 42400.0 -

Dev Tier Leaderboard

# Method Score PSNR SSIM Consistency Trust Source
1 Ghost-ViT + gradient 0.666 26.43 0.844 0.82 ✓ Certified Zhu et al., 2025
2 Quantum-ViT + gradient 0.648 25.39 0.814 0.84 ✓ Certified Quantum imaging transformer, 2024
3 ScoreQuantum + gradient 0.563 22.2 0.698 0.81 ✓ Certified Wei et al., 2025
4 Bayesian CS + gradient 0.546 21.5 0.668 0.82 ✓ Certified Bayesian compressed sensing
5 DRU-Net + gradient 0.542 21.05 0.648 0.86 ✓ Certified Wang et al., Sci. Rep. 2020
6 CS-TVAL3 + gradient 0.535 21.18 0.654 0.81 ✓ Certified Li et al., 2014
7 Photon Counting + gradient 0.522 20.64 0.629 0.82 ✓ Certified Classical baseline
8 Quantum-CNN + gradient 0.509 20.18 0.607 0.82 ✓ Certified Quantum imaging CNN
9 G(2)-Corr + gradient 0.448 18.13 0.506 0.82 ✓ Certified Pittman et al., PRA 1995
10 DiffusionQuantum + gradient 0.387 15.67 0.386 0.88 ✓ Certified Zhang et al., 2024

Visible Data Fields

y H_ideal spec_ranges

Dataset

Format: HDF5
Scenes: 3

Scoring Formula

0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖)

PSNR: 40% SSIM: 40% Consistency: 20%
Back to Ghost Imaging