Public
Focused Ion Beam SEM (FIB-SEM) — Public Tier
(3 scenes)Full-access development tier with all data visible.
What you get
Measurements (y), ideal forward operator (H), spec ranges, ground truth (x_true), and true mismatch spec.
How to use
Load HDF5 → compare reconstruction vs x_true → check consistency → iterate.
What to submit
Reconstructed signals (x_hat) and corrected spec as HDF5.
Parameter Specifications
✓
True spec visible — use these exact values for Scenario III oracle reconstruction.
| Parameter | Spec Range | True Value | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| slice_thickness_variation | -3.0 – 6.0 | 1.5 | - |
| curtaining_artifact | -0.06 – 0.12 | 0.03 | relative |
| charging | -60.0 – 120.0 | 30.0 | V |
| drift_between_slices | -1.0 – 2.0 | 0.5 | nm |
InverseNet Baseline Scores
Method: CPU_baseline — Mismatch parameter: nominal
Scenario I (Ideal)
19.81 dB
SSIM 0.4840
Scenario II (Mismatch)
17.32 dB
SSIM 0.1061
Scenario III (Oracle)
19.62 dB
SSIM 0.2167
Per-scene breakdown (4 scenes)
| Scene | PSNR I | SSIM I | PSNR II | SSIM II | PSNR III | SSIM III |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| scene_00 | 19.40 | 0.4889 | 16.96 | 0.1087 | 19.66 | 0.2303 |
| scene_01 | 20.39 | 0.4977 | 17.60 | 0.1075 | 19.60 | 0.2162 |
| scene_02 | 20.11 | 0.4612 | 17.67 | 0.0963 | 20.09 | 0.2040 |
| scene_03 | 19.34 | 0.4883 | 17.06 | 0.1120 | 19.15 | 0.2163 |
Public Tier Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM | Consistency | Trust | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DiffFIB + gradient | 0.844 | 36.91 | 0.978 | 0.92 | ✓ Certified | Gao et al., NeurIPS 2024 |
| 2 | SwinFIB + gradient | 0.836 | 35.89 | 0.973 | 0.94 | ✓ Certified | Wang et al., Nat. Commun. 2023 |
| 3 | PhysFIB + gradient | 0.829 | 36.17 | 0.974 | 0.89 | ✓ Certified | Chen et al., Nat. Commun. 2024 |
| 4 | TransFIB + gradient | 0.796 | 33.38 | 0.956 | 0.9 | ✓ Certified | Li et al., Nat. Methods 2022 |
| 5 | N2V-FIB + gradient | 0.788 | 32.07 | 0.943 | 0.95 | ✓ Certified | Krull et al., NeurIPS 2019 |
| 6 | DnCNN-FIB + gradient | 0.735 | 29.4 | 0.907 | 0.89 | ✓ Certified | Buchholz et al., Nat. Methods 2019 |
| 7 | TV-FIB + gradient | 0.689 | 26.78 | 0.853 | 0.9 | ✓ Certified | Rudin et al., Physica D 1992 |
| 8 | NLM-FIB + gradient | 0.675 | 25.93 | 0.83 | 0.92 | ✓ Certified | Buades et al., CVPR 2005 |
| 9 | BM3D-FIB + gradient | 0.635 | 24.08 | 0.771 | 0.93 | ✓ Certified | Dabov et al., IEEE TIP 2007 |
Visible Data Fields
y
H_ideal
spec_ranges
x_true
true_spec
Dataset
Format: HDF5
Scenes: 3
Scoring Formula
0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖)
PSNR: 40%
SSIM: 40%
Consistency: 20%