Event Camera / Dynamic Vision Sensor (DVS)
Event Camera / Dynamic Vision Sensor (DVS)
Standard reconstruction benchmark — forward model perfectly known, no calibration needed. Score = 0.5 × clip((PSNR−15)/30, 0, 1) + 0.5 × SSIM
| # | Method | Score | PSNR (dB) | SSIM | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🥇 |
DiffEvent
DiffEvent Gao et al. 2024
39.4 dB
SSIM 0.955
Checkpoint unavailable
|
0.884 | 39.4 | 0.955 | ✓ Certified | Gao et al. 2024 |
| 🥈 |
PhysEvent
PhysEvent Chen et al. 2024
38.0 dB
SSIM 0.944
Checkpoint unavailable
|
0.855 | 38.0 | 0.944 | ✓ Certified | Chen et al. 2024 |
| 🥉 |
SwinEvent
SwinEvent Zhang et al. 2023
36.9 dB
SSIM 0.933
Checkpoint unavailable
|
0.832 | 36.9 | 0.933 | ✓ Certified | Zhang et al. 2023 |
| 4 |
TransEvent
TransEvent Weng et al. 2022
35.2 dB
SSIM 0.914
Checkpoint unavailable
|
0.794 | 35.2 | 0.914 | ✓ Certified | Weng et al. 2022 |
| 5 |
SPADE-E2VID
SPADE-E2VID Cadena et al. 2021
32.8 dB
SSIM 0.878
Checkpoint unavailable
|
0.736 | 32.8 | 0.878 | ✓ Certified | Cadena et al. 2021 |
| 6 | FireNet | 0.678 | 30.4 | 0.843 | ✓ Certified | Scheerlinck et al. 2020 |
| 7 | E2VID | 0.614 | 27.9 | 0.798 | ✓ Certified | Rebecq et al. 2020 |
| 8 | Complementary | 0.537 | 24.8 | 0.748 | ✓ Certified | Scheerlinck et al. 2018 |
| 9 | Event-Integration | 0.469 | 22.1 | 0.702 | ✓ Certified | Mead & Mahowald 1989 |
Dataset: PWM Benchmark (9 algorithms)
Blind Reconstruction Challenge — forward model has unknown mismatch, must calibrate from data. Score = 0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖)
| # | Method | Overall Score | Public PSNR / SSIM |
Dev PSNR / SSIM |
Hidden PSNR / SSIM |
Trust | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🥇 | DiffEvent + gradient | 0.790 |
0.838
36.4 dB / 0.975
|
0.776
33.47 dB / 0.957
|
0.755
32.11 dB / 0.944
|
✓ Certified | Gao et al., NeurIPS 2024 |
| 🥈 | PhysEvent + gradient | 0.755 |
0.823
35.93 dB / 0.973
|
0.735
29.37 dB / 0.907
|
0.706
28.43 dB / 0.890
|
✓ Certified | Chen et al., ECCV 2024 |
| 🥉 | SwinEvent + gradient | 0.745 |
0.808
34.11 dB / 0.962
|
0.761
31.6 dB / 0.938
|
0.666
26.13 dB / 0.836
|
✓ Certified | Zhang et al., CVPR 2023 |
| 4 | TransEvent + gradient | 0.721 |
0.785
32.73 dB / 0.950
|
0.714
29.0 dB / 0.900
|
0.664
26.35 dB / 0.842
|
✓ Certified | Weng et al., ECCV 2022 |
| 5 | SPADE-E2VID + gradient | 0.609 |
0.749
30.14 dB / 0.919
|
0.581
22.78 dB / 0.722
|
0.497
19.36 dB / 0.568
|
✓ Certified | Cadena et al., IEEE TIP 2021 |
| 6 | Complementary + gradient | 0.582 |
0.614
23.06 dB / 0.733
|
0.596
23.23 dB / 0.740
|
0.537
21.02 dB / 0.647
|
✓ Certified | Scheerlinck et al., RA-L 2018 |
| 7 | FireNet + gradient | 0.569 |
0.709
27.94 dB / 0.880
|
0.517
20.25 dB / 0.611
|
0.480
19.28 dB / 0.564
|
✓ Certified | Scheerlinck et al., WACV 2020 |
| 8 | E2VID + gradient | 0.522 |
0.664
25.78 dB / 0.826
|
0.481
18.97 dB / 0.548
|
0.422
17.66 dB / 0.483
|
✓ Certified | Rebecq et al., IEEE TPAMI 2020 |
| 9 | Event-Integration + gradient | 0.497 |
0.502
19.4 dB / 0.570
|
0.517
20.26 dB / 0.611
|
0.471
19.1 dB / 0.555
|
✓ Certified | Mead & Mahowald, Analog VLSI 1989 |
Complete score requires all 3 tiers (Public + Dev + Hidden).
Join the competition →Full-access development tier with all data visible.
What you get & how to use
What you get: Measurements (y), ideal forward operator (H), spec ranges, ground truth (x_true), and true mismatch spec.
How to use: Load HDF5 → compare reconstruction vs x_true → check consistency → iterate.
What to submit: Reconstructed signals (x_hat) and corrected spec as HDF5.
Public Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DiffEvent + gradient | 0.838 | 36.4 | 0.975 |
| 2 | PhysEvent + gradient | 0.823 | 35.93 | 0.973 |
| 3 | SwinEvent + gradient | 0.808 | 34.11 | 0.962 |
| 4 | TransEvent + gradient | 0.785 | 32.73 | 0.95 |
| 5 | SPADE-E2VID + gradient | 0.749 | 30.14 | 0.919 |
| 6 | FireNet + gradient | 0.709 | 27.94 | 0.88 |
| 7 | E2VID + gradient | 0.664 | 25.78 | 0.826 |
| 8 | Complementary + gradient | 0.614 | 23.06 | 0.733 |
| 9 | Event-Integration + gradient | 0.502 | 19.4 | 0.57 |
Spec Ranges (4 parameters)
| Parameter | Min | Max | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| contrast_threshold | 0.26 | 0.38 | logintensity |
| refractory_period | -0.8 | 4.6 | us |
| noise_event_rate | -0.2 | 0.4 | ofrealevents |
| hot_pixel_fraction | -0.1 | 0.2 | - |
Blind evaluation tier — no ground truth available.
What you get & how to use
What you get: Measurements (y), ideal forward operator (H), and spec ranges only.
How to use: Apply your pipeline from the Public tier. Use consistency as self-check.
What to submit: Reconstructed signals and corrected spec. Scored server-side.
Dev Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DiffEvent + gradient | 0.776 | 33.47 | 0.957 |
| 2 | SwinEvent + gradient | 0.761 | 31.6 | 0.938 |
| 3 | PhysEvent + gradient | 0.735 | 29.37 | 0.907 |
| 4 | TransEvent + gradient | 0.714 | 29.0 | 0.9 |
| 5 | Complementary + gradient | 0.596 | 23.23 | 0.74 |
| 6 | SPADE-E2VID + gradient | 0.581 | 22.78 | 0.722 |
| 7 | FireNet + gradient | 0.517 | 20.25 | 0.611 |
| 8 | Event-Integration + gradient | 0.517 | 20.26 | 0.611 |
| 9 | E2VID + gradient | 0.481 | 18.97 | 0.548 |
Spec Ranges (4 parameters)
| Parameter | Min | Max | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| contrast_threshold | 0.252 | 0.372 | logintensity |
| refractory_period | -1.16 | 4.24 | us |
| noise_event_rate | -0.24 | 0.36 | ofrealevents |
| hot_pixel_fraction | -0.12 | 0.18 | - |
Fully blind server-side evaluation — no data download.
What you get & how to use
What you get: No data downloadable. Algorithm runs server-side on hidden measurements.
How to use: Package algorithm as Docker container / Python script. Submit via link.
What to submit: Containerized algorithm accepting y + H, outputting x_hat + corrected spec.
Hidden Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DiffEvent + gradient | 0.755 | 32.11 | 0.944 |
| 2 | PhysEvent + gradient | 0.706 | 28.43 | 0.89 |
| 3 | SwinEvent + gradient | 0.666 | 26.13 | 0.836 |
| 4 | TransEvent + gradient | 0.664 | 26.35 | 0.842 |
| 5 | Complementary + gradient | 0.537 | 21.02 | 0.647 |
| 6 | SPADE-E2VID + gradient | 0.497 | 19.36 | 0.568 |
| 7 | FireNet + gradient | 0.480 | 19.28 | 0.564 |
| 8 | Event-Integration + gradient | 0.471 | 19.1 | 0.555 |
| 9 | E2VID + gradient | 0.422 | 17.66 | 0.483 |
Spec Ranges (4 parameters)
| Parameter | Min | Max | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| contrast_threshold | 0.272 | 0.392 | logintensity |
| refractory_period | -0.26 | 5.14 | us |
| noise_event_rate | -0.14 | 0.46 | ofrealevents |
| hot_pixel_fraction | -0.07 | 0.23 | - |
Blind Reconstruction Challenge
ChallengeGiven measurements with unknown mismatch and spec ranges (not exact params), reconstruct the original signal. A method must be evaluated on all three tiers for a complete score. Scored on a composite metric: 0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖).
Measurements y, ideal forward model H, spec ranges
Reconstructed signal x̂
Spec DAG — Forward Model Pipeline
M → D
Mismatch Parameters
| Symbol | Parameter | Description | Nominal | Perturbed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| c_t | contrast_threshold | Contrast threshold (log intensity) | 0.3 | 0.34 |
| r_p | refractory_period | Refractory period (us) | 1.0 | 2.8 |
| n_e | noise_event_rate | Noise event rate (of real events) | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| h_p | hot_pixel_fraction | Hot pixel fraction (-) | 0.0 | 0.1 |
Credits System
Spec Primitives Reference (11 primitives)
Free-space or medium propagation kernel (Fresnel, Rayleigh-Sommerfeld).
Spatial or spatio-temporal amplitude modulation (coded aperture, SLM pattern).
Geometric projection operator (Radon transform, fan-beam, cone-beam).
Sampling in the Fourier / k-space domain (MRI, ptychography).
Shift-invariant convolution with a point-spread function (PSF).
Summation along a physical dimension (spectral, temporal, angular).
Sensor readout with gain g and noise model η (Gaussian, Poisson, mixed).
Patterned illumination (block, Hadamard, random) applied to the scene.
Spectral dispersion element (prism, grating) with shift α and aperture a.
Sample or gantry rotation (CT, electron tomography).
Spectral filter or monochromator selecting a wavelength band.