Public

Entangled Photon Microscopy — Public Tier

(3 scenes)

Full-access development tier with all data visible.

What you get

Measurements (y), ideal forward operator (H), spec ranges, ground truth (x_true), and true mismatch spec.

How to use

Load HDF5 → compare reconstruction vs x_true → check consistency → iterate.

What to submit

Reconstructed signals (x_hat) and corrected spec as HDF5.

Parameter Specifications

True spec visible — use these exact values for Scenario III oracle reconstruction.

Parameter Spec Range True Value Unit
pair_generation_rate -2.0 – 4.0 1.0 -
coincidence_window -0.8 – 4.6 1.9 ns
accidental_coincidence_rate -4.0 – 8.0 2.0 -
photon_loss_(per_arm) -1.2 – 2.4 0.6 dB

InverseNet Baseline Scores

Method: CPU_baseline — Mismatch parameter: nominal

Scenario I (Ideal)

6.97 dB

SSIM 0.2037

Scenario II (Mismatch)

6.97 dB

SSIM 0.1457

Scenario III (Oracle)

10.09 dB

SSIM 0.2808

Per-scene breakdown (4 scenes)
Scene PSNR I SSIM I PSNR II SSIM II PSNR III SSIM III
scene_00 6.67 0.1907 6.63 0.1348 9.76 0.2662
scene_01 6.94 0.2009 6.94 0.1453 10.04 0.2786
scene_02 7.55 0.2318 7.63 0.1622 10.73 0.3080
scene_03 6.69 0.1916 6.70 0.1404 9.84 0.2704

Public Tier Leaderboard

# Method Score PSNR SSIM Consistency Trust Source
1 DiffGhost + gradient 0.831 36.32 0.975 0.89 ✓ Certified Gao et al., NeurIPS 2024
2 PhysGhost + gradient 0.810 34.46 0.964 0.9 ✓ Certified Chen et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 2024
3 SwinGhost + gradient 0.792 33.52 0.957 0.87 ✓ Certified Wang et al., npj Quantum Inf. 2023
4 TransGhost + gradient 0.765 31.32 0.935 0.89 ✓ Certified Li et al., Opt. Express 2022
5 GAN-Ghost + gradient 0.725 29.02 0.901 0.87 ✓ Certified Wang et al., Phys. Rev. A 2019
6 DnCNN-Ghost + gradient 0.670 26.06 0.834 0.88 ✓ Certified Lyu et al., Optica 2017
7 SVD-Ghost + gradient 0.583 22.11 0.695 0.92 ✓ Certified Gong et al., Sci. Rep. 2010
8 CS-Ghost + gradient 0.509 19.57 0.578 0.91 ✓ Certified Katz et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009
9 Coincidence-Count + gradient 0.436 17.28 0.464 0.89 ✓ Certified Pittman et al., Phys. Rev. A 1995

Visible Data Fields

y H_ideal spec_ranges x_true true_spec

Dataset

Format: HDF5
Scenes: 3

Scoring Formula

0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖)

PSNR: 40% SSIM: 40% Consistency: 20%
Back to Entangled Photon Microscopy