Hidden
Entangled Photon Microscopy — Hidden Tier
(3 scenes)Fully blind server-side evaluation — no data download.
What you get
No data downloadable. Algorithm runs server-side on hidden measurements.
How to use
Package algorithm as Docker container / Python script. Submit via link.
What to submit
Containerized algorithm accepting y + H, outputting x_hat + corrected spec.
Parameter Specifications
🔒
True spec hidden — blind evaluation, only ranges available.
| Parameter | Spec Range | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| pair_generation_rate | -1.4 – 4.6 | - |
| coincidence_window | -0.26 – 5.14 | ns |
| accidental_coincidence_rate | -2.8 – 9.2 | - |
| photon_loss_(per_arm) | -0.84 – 2.76 | dB |
Hidden Tier Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM | Consistency | Trust | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SwinGhost + gradient | 0.728 | 29.96 | 0.916 | 0.81 | ✓ Certified | Wang et al., npj Quantum Inf. 2023 |
| 2 | TransGhost + gradient | 0.669 | 26.88 | 0.855 | 0.79 | ✓ Certified | Li et al., Opt. Express 2022 |
| 3 | DiffGhost + gradient | 0.650 | 25.95 | 0.831 | 0.79 | ✓ Certified | Gao et al., NeurIPS 2024 |
| 4 | PhysGhost + gradient | 0.596 | 23.96 | 0.767 | 0.75 | ✓ Certified | Chen et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 2024 |
| 5 | GAN-Ghost + gradient | 0.548 | 22.17 | 0.697 | 0.74 | ✓ Certified | Wang et al., Phys. Rev. A 2019 |
| 6 | DnCNN-Ghost + gradient | 0.525 | 20.9 | 0.641 | 0.8 | ✓ Certified | Lyu et al., Optica 2017 |
| 7 | Coincidence-Count + gradient | 0.407 | 16.95 | 0.448 | 0.79 | ✓ Certified | Pittman et al., Phys. Rev. A 1995 |
| 8 | SVD-Ghost + gradient | 0.341 | 14.26 | 0.321 | 0.85 | ✓ Certified | Gong et al., Sci. Rep. 2010 |
| 9 | CS-Ghost + gradient | 0.314 | 13.07 | 0.272 | 0.87 | ✓ Certified | Katz et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009 |
Dataset
Scenes: 3
Scoring Formula
0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖)
PSNR: 40%
SSIM: 40%
Consistency: 20%