Dev
Eddy Current Imaging — Dev Tier
(3 scenes)Blind evaluation tier — no ground truth available.
What you get
Measurements (y), ideal forward operator (H), and spec ranges only.
How to use
Apply your pipeline from the Public tier. Use consistency as self-check.
What to submit
Reconstructed signals and corrected spec. Scored server-side.
Parameter Specifications
🔒
True spec hidden — estimate parameters from spec ranges below.
| Parameter | Spec Range | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| liftoff_distance | -0.24 – 0.36 | mm |
| conductivity_error | 57.28 – 59.08 | MS/m |
| excitation_frequency_drift | 98.8 – 101.8 | kHz |
| probe_tilt | -0.48 – 0.72 | deg |
Dev Tier Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM | Consistency | Trust | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DiffEC + gradient | 0.762 | 32.05 | 0.943 | 0.82 | ✓ Certified | Gao et al., NeurIPS 2024 |
| 2 | SwinEC + gradient | 0.757 | 31.82 | 0.941 | 0.81 | ✓ Certified | Wang et al., NDT&E Int. 2023 |
| 3 | PhysEC + gradient | 0.747 | 30.49 | 0.924 | 0.86 | ✓ Certified | Chen et al., IEEE Trans. Magn. 2024 |
| 4 | TransEC + gradient | 0.701 | 27.83 | 0.877 | 0.86 | ✓ Certified | Li et al., IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2022 |
| 5 | ECNN-Defect + gradient | 0.677 | 26.81 | 0.853 | 0.84 | ✓ Certified | Zhang et al., NDT&E Int. 2021 |
| 6 | MUSIC-EC + gradient | 0.644 | 25.12 | 0.806 | 0.85 | ✓ Certified | Skarlatos et al., NDT&E Int. 2012 |
| 7 | DnCNN-EC + gradient | 0.551 | 21.44 | 0.666 | 0.85 | ✓ Certified | Gao et al., IEEE Sens. J. 2019 |
| 8 | EC-Deconv + gradient | 0.469 | 18.82 | 0.541 | 0.82 | ✓ Certified | Bowler, J. Appl. Phys. 1994 |
| 9 | TV-EC + gradient | 0.367 | 15.65 | 0.385 | 0.78 | ✓ Certified | Sabbagh et al., IEEE Trans. Magn. 2010 |
Visible Data Fields
y
H_ideal
spec_ranges
Dataset
Format: HDF5
Scenes: 3
Scoring Formula
0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖)
PSNR: 40%
SSIM: 40%
Consistency: 20%