Differential Interference Contrast (DIC)
Differential Interference Contrast (DIC)
Standard reconstruction benchmark — forward model perfectly known, no calibration needed. Score = 0.5 × clip((PSNR−15)/30, 0, 1) + 0.5 × SSIM
| # | Method | Score | PSNR (dB) | SSIM | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🥇 |
DiffusionDIC
DiffusionDIC Luo 2023
39.2 dB
SSIM 0.950
Checkpoint unavailable
|
0.878 | 39.2 | 0.950 | ✓ Certified | Luo 2023 |
| 🥈 |
PhysPhase-Net
PhysPhase-Net Barbastathis 2019
37.4 dB
SSIM 0.935
Checkpoint unavailable
|
0.841 | 37.4 | 0.935 | ✓ Certified | Barbastathis 2019 |
| 🥉 |
SwinDIC
SwinDIC Liang 2021
36.1 dB
SSIM 0.921
Checkpoint unavailable
|
0.812 | 36.1 | 0.921 | ✓ Certified | Liang 2021 |
| 4 |
PhaseNet-DIC
PhaseNet-DIC Sinha 2020
33.7 dB
SSIM 0.884
Checkpoint unavailable
|
0.754 | 33.7 | 0.884 | ✓ Certified | Sinha 2020 |
| 5 | PnP-DIC | 0.721 | 32.2 | 0.869 | ✓ Certified | Kamilov 2017 |
| 6 |
DIC-CNN
DIC-CNN Rivenson 2018
31.4 dB
SSIM 0.856
Checkpoint unavailable
|
0.701 | 31.4 | 0.856 | ✓ Certified | Rivenson 2018 |
| 7 | TV-DIC | 0.610 | 27.8 | 0.793 | ✓ Certified | Bostan 2014 |
| 8 | Phase-DLSIM | 0.563 | 25.9 | 0.762 | ✓ Certified | Stephens 2003 |
| 9 | DIC-Deconv | 0.517 | 24.1 | 0.731 | ✓ Certified | Preza 1999 |
Dataset: PWM Benchmark (9 algorithms)
Blind Reconstruction Challenge — forward model has unknown mismatch, must calibrate from data. Score = 0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖)
| # | Method | Overall Score | Public PSNR / SSIM |
Dev PSNR / SSIM |
Hidden PSNR / SSIM |
Trust | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🥇 | SwinDIC + gradient | 0.762 |
0.798
33.5 dB / 0.957
|
0.763
32.12 dB / 0.944
|
0.724
29.24 dB / 0.904
|
✓ Certified | Liang et al., ICCV 2021 (DIC) |
| 🥈 | DiffusionDIC + gradient | 0.761 |
0.835
36.48 dB / 0.976
|
0.744
30.23 dB / 0.920
|
0.705
28.38 dB / 0.889
|
✓ Certified | Luo et al., Nat. Photonics 2023 (DIC) |
| 🥉 | PhysPhase-Net + gradient | 0.727 |
0.814
35.1 dB / 0.968
|
0.700
28.68 dB / 0.894
|
0.668
26.26 dB / 0.839
|
✓ Certified | Barbastathis et al., Optica 2019 |
| 4 | PhaseNet-DIC + gradient | 0.683 |
0.788
32.35 dB / 0.946
|
0.650
25.95 dB / 0.831
|
0.610
23.75 dB / 0.760
|
✓ Certified | Sinha et al., Optica 2020 |
| 5 | PnP-DIC + gradient | 0.659 |
0.739
29.5 dB / 0.909
|
0.645
25.72 dB / 0.824
|
0.592
23.53 dB / 0.751
|
✓ Certified | Kamilov et al., Optica 2017 (DIC) |
| 6 | DIC-CNN + gradient | 0.643 |
0.722
28.43 dB / 0.890
|
0.637
24.55 dB / 0.788
|
0.570
23.0 dB / 0.731
|
✓ Certified | Rivenson et al., Optica 2018 |
| 7 | Phase-DLSIM + gradient | 0.574 |
0.620
23.93 dB / 0.766
|
0.582
22.81 dB / 0.724
|
0.519
20.33 dB / 0.614
|
✓ Certified | Stephens & Allen, J. Biomed. Opt. 2003 |
| 8 | DIC-Deconv + gradient | 0.560 |
0.606
22.99 dB / 0.731
|
0.559
22.1 dB / 0.694
|
0.516
20.35 dB / 0.615
|
✓ Certified | Preza et al., JOSA A 1999 |
| 9 | TV-DIC + gradient | 0.542 |
0.685
26.21 dB / 0.838
|
0.512
20.42 dB / 0.619
|
0.429
17.35 dB / 0.468
|
✓ Certified | Bostan et al., IEEE TIP 2014 |
Complete score requires all 3 tiers (Public + Dev + Hidden).
Join the competition →Full-access development tier with all data visible.
What you get & how to use
What you get: Measurements (y), ideal forward operator (H), spec ranges, ground truth (x_true), and true mismatch spec.
How to use: Load HDF5 → compare reconstruction vs x_true → check consistency → iterate.
What to submit: Reconstructed signals (x_hat) and corrected spec as HDF5.
Public Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DiffusionDIC + gradient | 0.835 | 36.48 | 0.976 |
| 2 | PhysPhase-Net + gradient | 0.814 | 35.1 | 0.968 |
| 3 | SwinDIC + gradient | 0.798 | 33.5 | 0.957 |
| 4 | PhaseNet-DIC + gradient | 0.788 | 32.35 | 0.946 |
| 5 | PnP-DIC + gradient | 0.739 | 29.5 | 0.909 |
| 6 | DIC-CNN + gradient | 0.722 | 28.43 | 0.89 |
| 7 | TV-DIC + gradient | 0.685 | 26.21 | 0.838 |
| 8 | Phase-DLSIM + gradient | 0.620 | 23.93 | 0.766 |
| 9 | DIC-Deconv + gradient | 0.606 | 22.99 | 0.731 |
Spec Ranges (3 parameters)
| Parameter | Min | Max | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| shear_amount | 80.0 | 140.0 | nm |
| bias_retardation | -0.15 | 0.15 | nm |
| prism_orientation | -0.6 | 1.2 | deg |
Blind evaluation tier — no ground truth available.
What you get & how to use
What you get: Measurements (y), ideal forward operator (H), and spec ranges only.
How to use: Apply your pipeline from the Public tier. Use consistency as self-check.
What to submit: Reconstructed signals and corrected spec. Scored server-side.
Dev Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SwinDIC + gradient | 0.763 | 32.12 | 0.944 |
| 2 | DiffusionDIC + gradient | 0.744 | 30.23 | 0.92 |
| 3 | PhysPhase-Net + gradient | 0.700 | 28.68 | 0.894 |
| 4 | PhaseNet-DIC + gradient | 0.650 | 25.95 | 0.831 |
| 5 | PnP-DIC + gradient | 0.645 | 25.72 | 0.824 |
| 6 | DIC-CNN + gradient | 0.637 | 24.55 | 0.788 |
| 7 | Phase-DLSIM + gradient | 0.582 | 22.81 | 0.724 |
| 8 | DIC-Deconv + gradient | 0.559 | 22.1 | 0.694 |
| 9 | TV-DIC + gradient | 0.512 | 20.42 | 0.619 |
Spec Ranges (3 parameters)
| Parameter | Min | Max | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| shear_amount | 76.0 | 136.0 | nm |
| bias_retardation | -0.15 | 0.15 | nm |
| prism_orientation | -0.72 | 1.08 | deg |
Fully blind server-side evaluation — no data download.
What you get & how to use
What you get: No data downloadable. Algorithm runs server-side on hidden measurements.
How to use: Package algorithm as Docker container / Python script. Submit via link.
What to submit: Containerized algorithm accepting y + H, outputting x_hat + corrected spec.
Hidden Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SwinDIC + gradient | 0.724 | 29.24 | 0.904 |
| 2 | DiffusionDIC + gradient | 0.705 | 28.38 | 0.889 |
| 3 | PhysPhase-Net + gradient | 0.668 | 26.26 | 0.839 |
| 4 | PhaseNet-DIC + gradient | 0.610 | 23.75 | 0.76 |
| 5 | PnP-DIC + gradient | 0.592 | 23.53 | 0.751 |
| 6 | DIC-CNN + gradient | 0.570 | 23.0 | 0.731 |
| 7 | Phase-DLSIM + gradient | 0.519 | 20.33 | 0.614 |
| 8 | DIC-Deconv + gradient | 0.516 | 20.35 | 0.615 |
| 9 | TV-DIC + gradient | 0.429 | 17.35 | 0.468 |
Spec Ranges (3 parameters)
| Parameter | Min | Max | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| shear_amount | 86.0 | 146.0 | nm |
| bias_retardation | -0.15 | 0.15 | nm |
| prism_orientation | -0.42 | 1.38 | deg |
Blind Reconstruction Challenge
ChallengeGiven measurements with unknown mismatch and spec ranges (not exact params), reconstruct the original signal. A method must be evaluated on all three tiers for a complete score. Scored on a composite metric: 0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖).
Measurements y, ideal forward model H, spec ranges
Reconstructed signal x̂
Spec DAG — Forward Model Pipeline
M → C → D
Mismatch Parameters
| Symbol | Parameter | Description | Nominal | Perturbed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| s_a | shear_amount | Shear amount (nm) | 100.0 | 120.0 |
| b_r | bias_retardation | Bias retardation (nm) | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| p_o | prism_orientation | Prism orientation (deg) | 0.0 | 0.6 |
Credits System
Spec Primitives Reference (11 primitives)
Free-space or medium propagation kernel (Fresnel, Rayleigh-Sommerfeld).
Spatial or spatio-temporal amplitude modulation (coded aperture, SLM pattern).
Geometric projection operator (Radon transform, fan-beam, cone-beam).
Sampling in the Fourier / k-space domain (MRI, ptychography).
Shift-invariant convolution with a point-spread function (PSF).
Summation along a physical dimension (spectral, temporal, angular).
Sensor readout with gain g and noise model η (Gaussian, Poisson, mixed).
Patterned illumination (block, Hadamard, random) applied to the scene.
Spectral dispersion element (prism, grating) with shift α and aperture a.
Sample or gantry rotation (CT, electron tomography).
Spectral filter or monochromator selecting a wavelength band.