Public
DESI Mass Spectrometry Imaging — Public Tier
(5 scenes)Full-access development tier with all data visible.
What you get
Measurements (y), ideal forward operator (H), spec ranges, ground truth (x_true), and true mismatch spec.
How to use
Load HDF5 → compare reconstruction vs x_true → check consistency → iterate.
What to submit
Reconstructed signals (x_hat) and corrected spec as HDF5.
Parameter Specifications
✓
True spec visible — use these exact values for Scenario III oracle reconstruction.
| Parameter | Spec Range | True Value | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| spray_angle_error | -1.0 – 2.0 | 0.5 | deg |
| solvent_flow_variation | -3.0 – 6.0 | 1.5 | - |
| ion_suppression_(matrix_effect) | -10.0 – 20.0 | 5.0 | - |
| spatial_resolution_degradation | -10.0 – 20.0 | 5.0 | - |
InverseNet Baseline Scores
Method: CPU_baseline — Mismatch parameter: nominal
Scenario I (Ideal)
20.86 dB
SSIM 0.5556
Scenario II (Mismatch)
17.94 dB
SSIM 0.2739
Scenario III (Oracle)
21.09 dB
SSIM 0.4477
Per-scene breakdown (4 scenes)
| Scene | PSNR I | SSIM I | PSNR II | SSIM II | PSNR III | SSIM III |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| scene_00 | 22.20 | 0.5293 | 20.35 | 0.2280 | 21.93 | 0.3469 |
| scene_01 | 22.95 | 0.6386 | 19.17 | 0.3063 | 21.54 | 0.4791 |
| scene_02 | 17.62 | 0.5116 | 14.75 | 0.2820 | 20.16 | 0.5023 |
| scene_03 | 20.65 | 0.5429 | 17.50 | 0.2793 | 20.72 | 0.4626 |
Public Tier Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM | Consistency | Trust | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DiffusionMSI + gradient | 0.824 | 35.52 | 0.971 | 0.9 | ✓ Certified | Palmer et al., Nat. Methods 2024 |
| 2 | MSIFormer + gradient | 0.799 | 34.04 | 0.961 | 0.87 | ✓ Certified | Kalinichenko et al., Nat. Methods 2023 |
| 3 | SpaMSI-Net + gradient | 0.777 | 31.84 | 0.941 | 0.91 | ✓ Certified | Rappez et al., Nat. Methods 2021 |
| 4 | DeepMSI + gradient | 0.769 | 31.06 | 0.932 | 0.93 | ✓ Certified | Gruber et al., Anal. Chem. 2021 |
| 5 | MSI-GAN + gradient | 0.764 | 31.39 | 0.936 | 0.88 | ✓ Certified | Yang et al., Anal. Chem. 2021 |
| 6 | MSI-TV + gradient | 0.709 | 27.51 | 0.87 | 0.93 | ✓ Certified | Fonville et al., Bioinformatics 2012 |
| 7 | MSI-NMF + gradient | 0.659 | 25.09 | 0.805 | 0.93 | ✓ Certified | Blanco et al., Anal. Chem. 2013 |
| 8 | MSI-PCA + gradient | 0.585 | 22.48 | 0.71 | 0.88 | ✓ Certified | Alexandrov et al., J. Bioinform. Comput. Biol. 2010 |
| 9 | MSI-Hotelling + gradient | 0.542 | 20.44 | 0.62 | 0.95 | ✓ Certified | Deininger et al., Proteomics 2011 |
Visible Data Fields
y
H_ideal
spec_ranges
x_true
true_spec
Dataset
Format: HDF5
Scenes: 5
Scoring Formula
0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖)
PSNR: 40%
SSIM: 40%
Consistency: 20%