Public

Dark-Field Microscopy — Public Tier

(5 scenes)

Full-access development tier with all data visible.

Measurements (y), ideal forward operator (H), spec ranges, ground truth (x_true), and true mismatch spec.

Load HDF5 → compare reconstruction vs x_true → check consistency → iterate.

Reconstructed signals (x_hat) and corrected spec as HDF5.

✓

True spec visible — use these exact values for Scenario III oracle reconstruction.

Parameter	Spec Range	True Value	Unit
condenser_na_vs_objective_na_ratio	1.14 – 1.32	1.23	-
stray_light	-1.0 – 2.0	0.5	relative
scattering_angle_range	-0.15 – 0.15	0.0	-

Method: CPU_baseline — Mismatch parameter: nominal

13.27 dB

SSIM 0.3991

11.88 dB

SSIM 0.2385

19.75 dB

SSIM 0.4579

Per-scene breakdown (4 scenes)

Scene	PSNR I	SSIM I	PSNR II	SSIM II	PSNR III	SSIM III
scene_00	17.02	0.3838	14.94	0.2440	20.04	0.5013
scene_01	14.23	0.2969	12.92	0.2098	19.23	0.5480
scene_02	8.52	0.3871	8.01	0.2308	20.11	0.3417
scene_03	13.30	0.5284	11.66	0.2694	19.61	0.4408

#	Method	Score	PSNR	SSIM	Consistency	Trust	Source
1	Restormer-DF + gradient	0.853	37.48	0.98	0.93	✓ Certified	Zamir et al., CVPR 2022 (DF)
2	DiffusionDF + gradient	0.850	38.31	0.983	0.87	✓ Certified	Luo et al., arXiv 2023 (DF)
3	SwinIR-DF + gradient	0.840	36.58	0.976	0.92	✓ Certified	Liang et al., ICCV 2021 (DF)
4	Noise2Void-DF + gradient	0.787	32.28	0.946	0.93	✓ Certified	Krull et al., CVPR 2019 (DF)
5	CARE-DF + gradient	0.787	33.29	0.955	0.86	✓ Certified	Weigert et al., Nat. Methods 2018 (DF)
6	BM3D-DF + gradient	0.768	30.87	0.929	0.94	✓ Certified	Dabov et al., IEEE TIP 2007 (DF adapt.)
7	TV-DF + gradient	0.704	27.88	0.878	0.87	✓ Certified	Rudin et al., Physica D 1992 (DF)
8	Wiener-DF + gradient	0.651	25.35	0.813	0.86	✓ Certified	Wiener, 1949 (DF adapt.)
9	Richardson-Lucy + gradient	0.606	22.74	0.721	0.95	✓ Certified	Richardson, JOSA 1972; Lucy, AJ 1974

y H_ideal spec_ranges x_true true_spec

Format: HDF5

Scenes: 5

0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖)

PSNR: 40% SSIM: 40% Consistency: 20%