Public
Cryo-EM Single Particle Analysis — Public Tier
(5 scenes)Full-access development tier with all data visible.
What you get
Measurements (y), ideal forward operator (H), spec ranges, ground truth (x_true), and true mismatch spec.
How to use
Load HDF5 → compare reconstruction vs x_true → check consistency → iterate.
What to submit
Reconstructed signals (x_hat) and corrected spec as HDF5.
Parameter Specifications
✓
True spec visible — use these exact values for Scenario III oracle reconstruction.
| Parameter | Spec Range | True Value | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| defocus_error | -100.0 – 200.0 | 50.0 | nm |
| astigmatism | -20.0 – 40.0 | 10.0 | nm |
| beam_tilt | -0.2 – 0.4 | 0.1 | mrad |
| ice_thickness_variation | 44.0 – 62.0 | 53.0 | nm |
InverseNet Baseline Scores
Method: CPU_baseline — Mismatch parameter: nominal
Scenario I (Ideal)
5.70 dB
SSIM 0.0146
Scenario II (Mismatch)
4.40 dB
SSIM -0.0052
Scenario III (Oracle)
25.22 dB
SSIM 0.0919
Per-scene breakdown (4 scenes)
| Scene | PSNR I | SSIM I | PSNR II | SSIM II | PSNR III | SSIM III |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| scene_00 | 5.68 | 0.0131 | 4.37 | -0.0049 | 27.06 | 0.1087 |
| scene_01 | 5.64 | 0.0164 | 4.41 | 0.0041 | 23.62 | 0.0568 |
| scene_02 | 5.81 | 0.0181 | 4.47 | -0.0131 | 22.68 | 0.0815 |
| scene_03 | 5.67 | 0.0107 | 4.34 | -0.0071 | 27.53 | 0.1205 |
Public Tier Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM | Consistency | Trust | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DiffusionCryo + gradient | 0.842 | 37.04 | 0.978 | 0.9 | ✓ Certified | Luo et al., arXiv 2024 |
| 2 | CryoSTAR + gradient | 0.825 | 35.48 | 0.971 | 0.91 | ✓ Certified | Yang et al., Nat. Methods 2024 |
| 3 | CryoFormer + gradient | 0.811 | 34.54 | 0.965 | 0.9 | ✓ Certified | Gao et al., CVPR 2024 |
| 4 | cryoDRGN + gradient | 0.789 | 32.27 | 0.946 | 0.94 | ✓ Certified | Zhong et al., Nat. Methods 2021 |
| 5 | CryoGEM + gradient | 0.788 | 33.21 | 0.954 | 0.87 | ✓ Certified | He et al., NeurIPS 2023 |
| 6 | IsoNet + gradient | 0.723 | 28.48 | 0.891 | 0.91 | ✓ Certified | Liu et al., Nat. Commun. 2021 |
| 7 | cryoSPARC + gradient | 0.667 | 25.92 | 0.83 | 0.88 | ✓ Certified | Punjani et al., Nat. Methods 2017 |
| 8 | RELION-3D + gradient | 0.640 | 24.18 | 0.775 | 0.94 | ✓ Certified | Scheres, J. Struct. Biol. 2012 |
| 9 | CTFFIND4 + gradient | 0.556 | 21.11 | 0.651 | 0.92 | ✓ Certified | Rohou & Grigorieff, J. Struct. Biol. 2015 |
Visible Data Fields
y
H_ideal
spec_ranges
x_true
true_spec
Dataset
Format: HDF5
Scenes: 5
Scoring Formula
0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖)
PSNR: 40%
SSIM: 40%
Consistency: 20%