Dev
Coded Exposure / Flutter Shutter — Dev Tier
(5 scenes)Blind evaluation tier — no ground truth available.
What you get
Measurements (y), ideal forward operator (H), and spec ranges only.
How to use
Apply your pipeline from the Public tier. Use consistency as self-check.
What to submit
Reconstructed signals and corrected spec. Scored server-side.
Parameter Specifications
🔒
True spec hidden — estimate parameters from spec ranges below.
| Parameter | Spec Range | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| shutter_code_timing_error | -1.2 – 1.8 | - |
| motion_blur_psf_mismatch | -4.8 – 7.2 | velocityerror |
| sensor_readout_noise | 2.6 – 8.6 | e- |
Dev Tier Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM | Consistency | Trust | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Restormer-Deblur + gradient | 0.764 | 32.07 | 0.943 | 0.83 | ✓ Certified | Zamir et al., CVPR 2022 |
| 2 | DiffusionDeblur + gradient | 0.744 | 30.56 | 0.925 | 0.84 | ✓ Certified | Whang et al., CVPR 2022 |
| 3 | MPRNet + gradient | 0.722 | 28.86 | 0.898 | 0.87 | ✓ Certified | Zamir et al., CVPR 2021 |
| 4 | BM3D-Deblur + gradient | 0.706 | 28.56 | 0.892 | 0.82 | ✓ Certified | Danielyan et al., IEEE TIP 2012 |
| 5 | DMPHN + gradient | 0.675 | 26.11 | 0.835 | 0.9 | ✓ Certified | Zhang et al., CVPR 2019 |
| 6 | DeblurGAN + gradient | 0.638 | 24.52 | 0.787 | 0.89 | ✓ Certified | Kupyn et al., CVPR 2018 |
| 7 | DnCNN-Deblur + gradient | 0.623 | 23.89 | 0.765 | 0.89 | ✓ Certified | Zhang et al., IEEE TIP 2017 |
| 8 | Wiener-Deconv + gradient | 0.596 | 23.43 | 0.748 | 0.81 | ✓ Certified | Wiener, MIT Tech. Rep. 1942 |
| 9 | TV-Deconv + gradient | 0.527 | 20.46 | 0.621 | 0.87 | ✓ Certified | Rudin et al., Physica D 1992 |
Visible Data Fields
y
H_ideal
spec_ranges
Dataset
Format: HDF5
Scenes: 5
Scoring Formula
0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖)
PSNR: 40%
SSIM: 40%
Consistency: 20%