Public
Correlative Light-Electron Microscopy (CLEM) — Public Tier
(3 scenes)Full-access development tier with all data visible.
What you get
Measurements (y), ideal forward operator (H), spec ranges, ground truth (x_true), and true mismatch spec.
How to use
Load HDF5 → compare reconstruction vs x_true → check consistency → iterate.
What to submit
Reconstructed signals (x_hat) and corrected spec as HDF5.
Parameter Specifications
✓
True spec visible — use these exact values for Scenario III oracle reconstruction.
| Parameter | Spec Range | True Value | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| registration_error_(lm_to_em) | -100.0 – 200.0 | 50.0 | nm |
| sample_deformation_(fixation) | -1.0 – 2.0 | 0.5 | shrinkage |
| fluorescence_preservation | 72.0 – 114.0 | 93.0 | - |
InverseNet Baseline Scores
Method: CPU_baseline — Mismatch parameter: nominal
Scenario I (Ideal)
7.72 dB
SSIM 0.3738
Scenario II (Mismatch)
7.66 dB
SSIM 0.2292
Scenario III (Oracle)
16.33 dB
SSIM 0.4587
Per-scene breakdown (4 scenes)
| Scene | PSNR I | SSIM I | PSNR II | SSIM II | PSNR III | SSIM III |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| scene_00 | 7.57 | 0.3615 | 7.52 | 0.2249 | 16.28 | 0.4660 |
| scene_01 | 7.70 | 0.3833 | 7.81 | 0.2328 | 16.28 | 0.4522 |
| scene_02 | 7.97 | 0.3846 | 7.55 | 0.2285 | 16.43 | 0.4500 |
| scene_03 | 7.63 | 0.3655 | 7.75 | 0.2308 | 16.33 | 0.4667 |
Public Tier Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM | Consistency | Trust | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DiffusionCLEM + gradient | 0.834 | 36.37 | 0.975 | 0.9 | ✓ Certified | Chen et al., Nat. Methods 2024 |
| 2 | TransMorph + gradient | 0.821 | 34.67 | 0.966 | 0.94 | ✓ Certified | Chen et al., Med. Image Anal. 2022 |
| 3 | PINN-CLEM + gradient | 0.818 | 34.8 | 0.966 | 0.92 | ✓ Certified | Löffler et al., Nat. Methods 2023 |
| 4 | SwinCLEM + gradient | 0.817 | 35.31 | 0.97 | 0.88 | ✓ Certified | Huang et al., IEEE TMI 2023 |
| 5 | CLEM-Net + gradient | 0.779 | 32.38 | 0.947 | 0.88 | ✓ Certified | Spiers et al., Nat. Methods 2021 |
| 6 | VoxelMorph + gradient | 0.774 | 31.38 | 0.936 | 0.93 | ✓ Certified | Balakrishnan et al., IEEE TPAMI 2019 |
| 7 | CNN-Reg + gradient | 0.712 | 28.31 | 0.887 | 0.87 | ✓ Certified | de Vos et al., NeuroImage 2019 |
| 8 | Landmark-Reg + gradient | 0.604 | 23.05 | 0.733 | 0.9 | ✓ Certified | Arganda-Carreras et al., Bioinformatics 2006 |
| 9 | Cross-Correlation + gradient | 0.593 | 22.48 | 0.71 | 0.92 | ✓ Certified | Thévenaz et al., IEEE TIP 1998 |
Visible Data Fields
y
H_ideal
spec_ranges
x_true
true_spec
Dataset
Format: HDF5
Scenes: 3
Scoring Formula
0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖)
PSNR: 40%
SSIM: 40%
Consistency: 20%